Re entry from space. Laughable. Imagine you're an astronot on a rocket, leaving earth, which according to the heliocentric model is going 67,000 mph. It would take an entire year to catch earth again and only if you waited in the exact right spot for it to come back around. Unless we have a space ship that goes 68,000 mph they never mentioned. This is the nonsense NASA wants us to believe and for some odd reason people are still trying to piece together this corpse of an idea hoping to resurrect portions of it. To include the globe. Neither is there such thing as "orbit". Any man-made thing that goes up, must come down, after the fuel is consumed. Until it comes down, it's fueled. As pointed out before in this thread, fuel operates in earth's atmosphere only, so it's obvious "space" rockets are a lie. It becomes clear how people will be persuaded to believe the Antichrist is god if they are willing to believe pathetic NASA lies.
I'm sorry to say that you're embarassing yourself here, Tradman, as you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
I'd advise you to research frames of reference, inertial systems, and orbital mechanics before you say anything on this topic again.
A rocket leaving Earth moving at 68,000mph retains the same speed ± it's own velocity obviously, also called deltaV.
An object moving fast enough around a center of mass can counteract its gravitational pull by canceling out the centrifugal and the centripetal (gravitational) forces - it remains constantly in free fall around the center of mass. Because these orbits are not perfect, a tiny amount of fuel is needed every year to keep a spacecraft in a healthy orbit.
What actually creates the reentry heat is a spacecraft that orbits Earth and starts entering the atmosphere at very high speeds - still relative to the 68,000mph movement vector - which creates immense friction with the air molecules brushing against the hull.
Also, it's not just NASA. But because you like it so much, here is footage of a reentry, filmed directly from the spacecraft:
Gorgeous CGI, or is it? Oh, here's a Russian spacecraft that is intentionally deorbited and disposed of: