Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why no Space Travel, not even LEO?  (Read 24175 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Why no Space Travel, not even LEO?
« Reply #100 on: March 11, 2022, 11:57:52 AM »
Well, the footage does indeed show a curving horizon. This is the uncropped image, rotated to horizontal.

Re: Why no Space Travel, not even LEO?
« Reply #101 on: March 11, 2022, 12:03:34 PM »
And then the globers try to pass this off as proof of curvature, even though this guy was at 1/3 the elevation as the V-2 rocket.


Well, this is obviously a fisheye lens and doesn't prove anything as such.

But, if we know the camera which took the image, we can correct for barrel distortion (usually fisheye distortion).

Using Adobe Lightroom for example.

Some interesting info here:
http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Lens+Distortion+and+the+Curvature+of+the+Earth#H_Lens_Correction

So we can take a distorted image and correct the lens distortion to get an undistorted image to see the actual, geometric curvature (shape) in a photo.



Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Why no Space Travel, not even LEO?
« Reply #102 on: March 11, 2022, 12:22:59 PM »
Here's an earth curve simulator.



Let's compare what the eye level would look like at ground level vs. what it would be at 120,000 feet, which is the altitude from which Baumgertner made the Red Bull jump.  Screenshots below are taken from the simulator above.



Now let's compare the view from within Baumgertner's capsule when he was down on earth and then when he was up at 128,000 feet (my earlier screenshot was from 120,000 ... so giving him a bit of an edge here).


Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Why no Space Travel, not even LEO?
« Reply #103 on: March 11, 2022, 01:16:07 PM »
I like this one too


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Why no Space Travel, not even LEO?
« Reply #104 on: March 11, 2022, 04:15:47 PM »
Well, this is obviously a fisheye lens and doesn't prove anything as such.

But, if we know the camera which took the image, we can correct for barrel distortion (usually fisheye distortion).

Using Adobe Lightroom for example.

Some interesting info here:
http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Lens+Distortion+and+the+Curvature+of+the+Earth#H_Lens_Correction

So we can take a distorted image and correct the lens distortion to get an undistorted image to see the actual, geometric curvature (shape) in a photo.

That's not what this guy says.