A nice simple explanation of how a submarine works.  

The video uses "center of gravity" and "center of weight" interchangeably.  I think it does that because it is.  We don't need gravity to explain boyance;  weight does the trick.  The only things we need gravity to explain are spinning ball earth (w/out people flying off), planets forming out of swirling dust balls, black holes, ect.  In other words, stuff that seems more like make believe/occult, than science.  

A nice simple explanation of how a submarine works.  

The video uses "center of gravity" and "center of weight" interchangeably.  I think it does that because it is.  We don't need gravity to explain boyance [sic];  weight does the trick.  The only things we need gravity to explain are spinning ball earth (w/out people flying off), planets forming out of swirling dust balls, black holes, ect [sic].  In other words, stuff that seems more like make believe/occult, than science.  

.
boyance? ect? made-up stuff like that? Or, are you an expert on made-up stuff like "flat" earthism?
.
But I digress.
.
If submarines are make-believe or occult, then why do they surface with all hands still alive? (Usually)

I didn't say anything like that.  Why are you being such a jerk?  You get you're acting like a jerk don't you?  You know that right?  

.
Yes, this is EXACTLY what you said:
.

A nice simple explanation of how a submarine works.  

The video uses "center of gravity" and "center of weight" interchangeably.  I think it does that because it is.  We don't need gravity to explain boyance;  weight does the trick.  The only things we need gravity to explain are spinning ball earth (w/out people flying off), planets forming out of swirling dust balls, black holes, ect.  In other words, stuff that seems more like make believe/occult, than science.  

.
You said "boyance" and "ect" those are direct quotes. It's quite precisely what you said.

What is boyance then, since you're so perfect.
.
Type "boyance" into a search engine and this is the first hit:
.

Oh no, a spelling error!  Try to stick to the topic Neil.  

.
It's very simple.
If you know what spelling mistakes you made, then FIX THEM and post your corrected version.
Otherwise you're just blowing smoke.
.
Here is the topic:
.

Submarines aren't real.  They are CGI made up by NASA.

Considering that the submarine footage in the 13 hours of the classic t.v. docuмentary Victory at Sea was advertised as having been chosen from genuine chemical-photographic film [†] made available by the U.S. Navy, including by being captured from the German or Imperial Japanese Navies, I'm very eager to read about the undisclosed role of Computer-Graphic Imaging in its production.


Victory at Sea was first broadcast by NBC over 1952--1953.  That was at the same time as the Remington-Rand UNIVAC I became operational.  It became famous among the general public on Election Night 1952--but on competitor CBS--where it unexpectedly-but-correctly called the U.S. Presidental Election for the underdog Eisenhower (R) over the poll-favorite Stevenson (D).  Having demonstrated such formidable forecasting powers, utilizing a 2-millisecond multiply and 1 kiloword decimal memory, it was an embarrassment of computational riches.

It's easy to understand why NBC would have wanted to get its own hands on such a blazingly fast platform for CGI.  I can't wait to read how NBC engineers brought all their latest technology together and made it all happen for Victory at Sea.


-------
Note †: Silver-halides: How quaint!

A nice simple explanation of how a submarine works.  

The video uses "center of gravity" and "center of weight" interchangeably.  I think it does that because it is.  We don't need gravity to explain boyance [sic];  weight does the trick.  The only things we need gravity to explain are spinning ball earth (w/out people flying off), planets forming out of swirling dust balls, black holes, ect [sic].  In other words, stuff that seems more like make believe/occult, than science.  

.
If you had any knowledge of engineering practices you'd realize that the movie uses "center of gravity" and "center of weight" interchangeably because different schools of engineering do that too. The reason is, gravity is a force, and weight is a force, so they're both forces, and they're both tied to the same objects.
.
If the same submarine were placed in an entirely different environment such as a body of water on Mars (presuming one could be found there, probably not) then center of gravity would be the preferred term so as not to be confused with the weight forces from Earth.
.
But in a purist sense, the same submarine would have different weight when located at different places on the Earth because the forces of gravity are different depending on where you're located. A mass weighed at the north pole for example is heavier than the same mass weighed at the equator. Therefore when speaking of situations that could be in various places all over the world, it would be better to stick to center of gravity.