I've looked into arguments from both sides so I asked AI and I got this lengthy conversation:


Why people can still see things way further that should fall below the curvature according to earth curvature calculations



There are a few reasons why people can see things that should be hidden behind the curvature of the Earth:

1. Atmospheric refraction: The Earth's atmosphere can bend light, causing it to follow a curved path. This can sometimes make objects appear higher than they actually are, allowing them to be seen over the curvature of the Earth.

2. Height: If an observer is at a high enough altitude, they may be able to see objects that are beyond the horizon. For example, from the top of a tall building or a mountain peak, an observer may be able to see farther than they would from ground level.

3. Optical illusions: Sometimes, objects can appear to be above the horizon even though they are actually below it. This can be caused by mirages, which occur when the air near the ground is warmer than the air above it, causing light to refract and create distorted images.

4. Inaccurate curvature calculations: Finally, it's possible that the curvature calculations used to determine what should be visible from a particular location are not entirely accurate. There are many factors that can affect how far an object can be seen, including weather conditions, atmospheric conditions, and the observer's height and location.


Why people can still see things way further that should fall below the curvature according to earth curvature calculations, with just ground level, right equipment and right earth curvature calculation



This is likely due to the fact that the curvature calculations are based on a perfect, uniform sphere model of the Earth, which is not entirely accurate. The Earth is actually slightly flattened at the poles and bulges at the equator, and its surface features such as mountains and valleys can also affect how far objects can be seen. Additionally, atmospheric conditions can play a role in allowing objects to be seen beyond the expected curvature. The right equipment, such as powerful telescopes or binoculars, can also help to magnify and clarify distant objects.

What's the point of curvature calculations if they're not accurate since the earth is not perfect sphere? Wouldn't that lead to calculation error when they do engineering? Or do people even take curvature into consideration when they do engineering?



Curvature calculations are still useful as a general guide for understanding the limitations of line-of-sight visibility on a spherical Earth. While the Earth is not a perfect sphere, it is close enough to one that the curvature calculations can provide a good estimate of how far away an object should be visible. Engineers and architects may take curvature into consideration when designing structures or infrastructure that require long-distance visibility, such as bridges or tall buildings. However, they would also take into account other factors such as atmospheric conditions, surface features, and the specific needs of the project. Ultimately, the accuracy of curvature calculations is just one factor among many that need to be considered in engineering and design.





What's an example of long distance bridge building that took the earth curvature into consideration

One example of a long distance bridge that took Earth's curvature into consideration is the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in New York City. The bridge spans a distance of 4,260 feet (1,298 meters) and was designed with a slight upward curve to account for the Earth's curvature. This was necessary to ensure that the bridge could be seen from far away and to prevent ships from colliding with it. The curvature of the bridge is not noticeable to drivers or pedestrians, but it is an important engineering feat that took into account the unique challenges posed by the Earth's shape.
(is this real? )


Why people can shoot laser beam to way further away to the other shore that should fall below the curvature according to earth curvature calculations, with just ground level, right equipment and right earth curvature calculation




This is because laser beams travel in a straight line and do not follow the curvature of the Earth. The curvature of the Earth only affects objects that are large enough to be affected by gravity, such as ships or bridges. However, when shooting a laser beam over a long distance, it is important to take into account the curvature of the Earth in order to ensure that the beam is aimed correctly and does not miss its target. This can be done using specialized equipment and calculations that take into account the distance, elevation, and curvature of the Earth.


How to explain that people can shoot laser beam at eye level to way further away to the other shore that should fall below the curvature according to earth curvature calculations, on ground level, and the right earth curvature calculation




While it may seem like the laser beam should fall below the curvature of the Earth, the reality is that the beam is traveling in a straight line and is not affected by the Earth's curvature. This means that if someone were to shoot a laser beam at eye level across a body of water, it would continue to travel in a straight line until it reached its target on the other shore, regardless of the curvature of the Earth. However, it's important to note that this only applies to relatively short distances, as over longer distances the curvature of the Earth would need to be taken into account to ensure that the laser beam is aimed correctly.




How is laser beam able to travel straight line not affected by the Earth's curvature even with very long distance



The laser beam is able to travel in a straight line over long distances because of the nature of light itself. Light travels in a straight line unless it is refracted or reflected by a medium such as water or air. In the case of a laser beam, it is emitted from a point source and travels through a vacuum, which means that there are no obstacles to cause it to deviate from its straight path. While the Earth's curvature does cause the laser beam to gradually rise above the surface, this effect is so small over short distances that it can be ignored. Over longer distances, however, the curvature of the Earth becomes more significant and must be taken into account in order to aim the laser beam accurately.
how do you explain someone shoot a laser beam at eye level across a body of water, it would continue to travel in a straight line until it reached its target on the other shore over a long distance, regardless of the curvature of the Earth



This phenomenon is known as the "line of sight" and is a result of the fact that light travels in straight lines unless it is refracted or reflected by an object. Over a small distance, the curvature of the Earth is negligible, and the laser beam would appear to travel in a straight line. However, over a long distance, the curvature of the Earth would become more apparent, and the laser beam would appear to gradually rise above the surface of the water. This effect can be observed by using a telescope or binoculars to watch the laser beam from a distance.




Why Apollo astronauts said they couldn't see the stars when they travelled to the moon but modern astronauts said they could see the stars in space station



The Apollo astronauts reported not being able to see the stars while on the moon because the bright sunlight reflecting off the lunar surface made it difficult for their eyes to adjust to the darkness and see the faint stars. Additionally, the astronauts were wearing bulky space suits with helmet visors that had a limited field of view, which may have further obstructed their ability to see the stars.

In contrast, modern astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS) are able to see the stars because they are not on a bright, reflective surface like the moon and their eyes have had time to adjust to the darkness. Additionally, the ISS has windows that provide a wider field of view and allow for better visibility of the stars.

(ps. I don't believe it, if the light was that bad they should all be blinded back then)



Why NASA made films of space station using CGI



NASA has created computer-generated imagery (CGI) of the International Space Station (ISS) for a variety of reasons. One reason is to provide a more accurate representation of what the ISS looks like and how it operates. The CGI allows for a more detailed and comprehensive view of the station's structure, layout, and systems than can be captured through traditional cameras.

Another reason for creating CGI of the ISS is to aid in astronaut training. The CGI can simulate different scenarios and situations that astronauts may encounter while on the station, allowing them to practice and prepare for these situations before they occur in real life.

Finally, the CGI can be used for public outreach and education. By creating visually stunning and informative videos and images of the ISS, NASA can help to inspire and educate people about space exploration and the importance of scientific research in space.



(huh so CGI is more accurate than reality )

The astronauts were on the "day" side of the moon, so it would be like daytime earth where it is so bright that our eyes can't see stars.

Has anyone broken it with a paradox yet? They must have some solution to that.