To me the strongest piece of evidence is the temperature variations and the seasons being consistent with specific tilts of the earth towards the sun. I also do not understand how flat earth theory is consistent with sun-rise and sun-set being at different times in different parts of the world in a pattern & movement that's consistent with the earth being a globe and the sun revolving around it (yes, I'm a geocentrist).
.
Flat-earthers have a lot of disagreement over how to account for time zones based on their silly flat-earthism model.
.
Some say that the sun curiously shines with greater range toward the north and south poles.
.
Others say that light travels further toward the north and the south, but deny there is any such thing as a south pole.
.
It is impossible to make a working model of a "flat" earth which exhibits the magnetic field observable on planet earth.
.
However, when a model globe earth is magnetized it works exactly the same way magnetic fields found on the real earth work in fact.
.
Yet others argue that "light doesn't travel forever" and therefore it falls short along the equator, but they can't seem to explain why.
.
There is no agreement among them to explain why the limits of each natural time zone is a meridian line instead of a parallel line.
.
Nor can they give any reasonable use of the word "parallel" for lines that are in their view imaginary concentric circles.
.
They cannot predict the time of sunrise using their model unless they abandon it and use a globe earth model, instead.
.
They cannot predict a solar eclipse or a lunar eclipse either, unless they leave their silly nonsense flat-earthism behind.
.
In fact, all their retarded flatness model is good for is posting its stupid CGI picture on the Internet for retarded readers to enjoy.
.
Oh, by the way, they use CGI all the time while they accuse others of being untruthful for using CGI.
.
Theirs is a one-way street, IOW do what I say, not what I do.
.