..
And goodness, while I'm happy to hear that Ireland is clear on this, it is by no means the only place.
..
Hey kiwiboy, do you remember this post, by a certain gtbe on ablf3, on 20 April 2017 ?
There is a great video going around about Mt. Taranaki, the one that was mentioned above.
He uses photos from different places, but note especially the last one, and where it was taken from. Not from a hill, but from sea level. The whole mountain should be under the horizon. We can't see through solid objects, we know this.
Anyway here is the video
I then went on to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that that video and photo actually was solid proof the earth is curved, as in "not flat". The reply from gtbe was :
Forget about the Mt. Taranaki one. Please don't get hung up on that one.
The bottom of Mt Taranaki, and the ship disappearing, does not prove the curvature. Certainly not according to the maths of the official scientific community because it goes out at far less of a rate. The principal way we set out to prove the flat earth is to show that the official figures do not add up. If you want to say that the earth is way bigger than 25000 miles round go ahead, but nobody says that.
What is happening here in these cases is the simple phenomen of convergence. It is why we cannot see to somewhere the other end of the world. It is an observation, based on the (well founded - as you will see) assumption that the earth is flat.
BTW, you didn't debunk the Mt. Taranaki video, just simply brought it to a point where neither of us could prove our point. And as for the second "undeniable proof" video, there is still no explanation for why we can see so much of that mountain, except that what we have been told is wrong. And so that is simply my point, and one of the reasons I am a flat earther.
Notice the change of tune? And the wriggling? It makes sense that you don't like Mt Taranaki anymore.
I'd say, you ARE the ringleader of the Irish Flat Earthers, aren't you?