.
Oh, did I disturb your nice slumber? You've been gone for 4 days and suddenly you wake up in the middle of the night, to what? 
.
Another difficult-to-refute observation, this time the full moon that's right in front of your face every month.
The full moon you can't deny so you pretend it's not the moon, or that it's not the sun shining on it, or the moon makes its own light, or there isn't any full moon, it's just our imagination.
.
Don't you ever get tired of trying to ignore the evidence God has put right there before your eyes?
.
You'd have made the Skeptics of ancient Greece blush.
.

We see the Moon all the time during the day.  

.
No, we don't. Half the time the moon is not visible during the daytime at all. What planet do you come from?
.

So, I don't think the Moon is reflecting light from the Sun.  

.
So, you're wrong. Next?
.

Anyone looking at a full moon can see, it is glowing.  We can see manufactured "reflectors" glowing on bicycles at night, but those "reflectors" are carefully manufactured arrays of tiny little mirrors that reflect the light off at deliberate angles.  The Moon, we are told, is covered with a thick layer of grey dust, similar looking to concrete dust.  I'll bet if you have a bag in your garage and you point a flashlight at it, it won't glow  

.
Dream on, funny guy.   
.
While you go down in flames! ...................... You can't make this stuff up.  

.
When I say "all the time" I mean exactly that, all the time. As in now, later, and at all times in between.
And when I say "always" I don't mean something else.
The full moon is always full. As in "at all times."
That's why it's called a full moon, because it's full.
Fortunately for those who need a second chance, the moon is still very close to full tonight.
So you can get almost the same view you could have had a few days ago, when I wrote this:
.
.
This week is when the full moon meets Catholic liturgy, because there was a full moon when Our Lord suffered in the Garden of Olives.
.
Catholics can step outside, or go to an olive garden, and have the full impression of what Our Lord saw that fateful night.
.
Notice the full moon doesn't have any shadow underneath it, which it would have if the earth were "flat."
.
If the sun were on the other side of a "flat" disk-earth, on the lowest part of the moon would appear a dark shadow where it's out of reach for sunlight, just as part of the moon appears in shadow in the crescent, quarter and gibbous phases.
.
No, the full moon is always FULL -- not sometimes, not usually, ALWAYS.
.
This is one of the MANY ways we can make first-hand observations that prove the earth is not "flat" but is rather spheroid.
.

.

What I don't get is how can the Moon be fully ulliminated every month, but then be completely blocked by The Earth during an eclipse?  I know the Moon is supposed to orbit at a 5 degree angle (preventing the Earth from blocking The Sun), but then somehow knows to switch its orbit occassionally, so as to be totally blocked by the Earth!  Sorry, but I'm just a bit skeptical    How is this supposed to work?  With all these round earth'ers out there, somebody should be able to explain this.  

.
You're problem is you think the earth is "flat" and that's why you have so much difficulty understanding the phases of the moon.
.
The moon is fully illuminated during the full moon phase because it is 240,000 miles away from earth and the earth's shadow therefore has a lot of room to MISS the moon in most cases.
.
The moon doesn't "switch" its orbit nor does the moon "know" anything.
.
The nice lady in the video is holding a white sphere on a pencil but that's entirely NOT TO SCALE.
If it were to scale, she would be 200 feet further from the lamp and the moon would be the size of a grain of sand.
And her eyeball would be the size of a BB if it were to scale for what size the earth is.
But that wouldn't make any sense in the video.
.
The orbit of the moon is very predictable. That's why lunar and solar eclipses can be very precisely forecast many years in advance.
.
BTW no flat-earthers can predict solar or lunar eclipses. Have you ever wondered about THAT?
.

See, in the rough diagram here from Hong Kong observatory, not drawn to scale, but it still illustrates the point, sunlight must travel past or somehow through the Earth to make the Moon appear "full."  Hence, the 5 degree tilt of the Moon's orbit, which changes to 0 degrees in an eclipse, in the round earth model.  So, somehow it has to change its orbit, which the claim is it does, with clock like precision, hence it is predictable.  Of course, the Chinese with their flat earth model didn't have any problem predicting eclipses either.  Still, eclipses seem pretty tough for pretty much everyone to explain!  

.
No, it is YOU who don't understand the (you say "Round") spheroid earth model correctly.
.
The only ones using "The Round Earth Model" (in quotes, no less) are ignorant flat-earthers, such as YOU.
.
Nobody is obliged to conform to your erroneous fantasy.
.
You are the one in error, and you are obliged to pay attention and learn.
.

No, I don't think you understand "The Round Earth Model" correctly.  The Moon's orbit is supposed to be at a tilt of 5 degrees, which allows the sunlight to hit the Moon.  However, during an eclipse, as I understand it, the orbit is supposed to be at 0 degrees.  

If the Moon is smaller, than the Earth and relatively close to the Earth, then it doesn't matter how much bigger the Sun is than the Earth.

See, in the rough diagram here from Hong Kong observatory, not drawn to scale, but it still illustrates the point, sunlight must travel past or somehow through the Earth to make the Moon appear "full."  Hence, the 5 degree tilt of the Moon's orbit, which changes to 0 degrees in an eclipse, in the round earth model.  So, somehow it has to change its orbit, which the claim is it does, with clock like precision, hence it is predictable.  Of course, the Chinese with their flat earth model didn't have any problem predicting eclipses either.  Still, eclipses seem pretty tough for pretty much everyone to explain!  

.
How many ways can you go wrong? I guess the estimate would be "infinite." You make one mistake after another.
Then you accuse me of not understanding your misunderstanding. Why should I try to accept your incorrect axioms and presuppositions?
.
You are wrong from the start.
.
You can't represent the orbit of the moon on a 2-dimensional diagram and expect to see how eclipses occur.
.
The moon's orbit doesn't change in order for eclipses to occur. It's the same orbit, under different time frames, when the path of the moon coincides with the shadow of the earth. The path of the moon varies every day, which you can see if you bother to look at the moon every day. Its elevation above the horizon is different day by day. But its orbit is consistent -- that is, consistent enough to explain why eclipses occur as they do. There are minuscule changes in the moon's orbit but those are not enough to make an eclipse happen or make one not happen that was going to before.
.
"If the Moon is smaller, [sic] than the Earth and relatively close to the Earth, then it doesn't matter how much bigger the Sun is than the Earth."
.
Your comma after "smaller" is inappropriate. Another example, from which there are so many to choose, of your being wrong.
.
If the moon is smaller than the earth and relatively close to the earth (compared to its distance to the sun) then it absolutely DOES matter how much bigger the sun is than the earth. If the sun were the same size as the earth but at the same distance it now is, we would be getting solar AND lunar eclipses a LOT more often and they would last A LOT LONGER.
.
Sunlight doesn't travel "through" the earth to make the moon appear "full." The darkest part of the earth's shadow (umbra) misses the moon most of the time, and only in rare instances does the umbra fall on the moon. The size of the earth's umbra hitting the moon is smaller than the earth, and it is a consequence of the relative diameters of the earth and sun and the relative distances between sun, earth and moon. Similarly, during a solar eclipse, the size of the moon's umbra hitting the earth (30 miles dia.) is much smaller than the moon (about 2,160 miles diameter).
.

.
In this comparison of the size of the United States to a full moon, recall the size of the umbra crossing the States this past August.
.

.
Not to scale:

.

.
However, the penumbra of the earth's shadow falls much more often on the moon even while that isn't something that is obvious from earth, any more than the penumbra of the moon's shadow falling on earth is obvious for someone outside the path of totality. If you have paid attention to a solar eclipse when you are located where the eclipse is PARTIAL (in the penumbra), you might have noticed that the appearance of the sun's daylight doesn't change all that much. When you find yourself in the outer limits of the penumbra, unless you use some projection device or optical filter device, you wouldn't notice there is an eclipse going on at all, unless you knew how to observe the shape of the shadows under trees or shining through other small apertures.
.
I know this is the case because I have gone out in public with projection devices and have found that most people at large are not only unaware of the eclipse in progress, they don't care that it's happening when I have told them about it.
.
Therefore the indifference of flat-earthers to the reality of our world is not unusual. Most people don't care, nor do they want to learn how to care when someone offers them the experience.
.
Tell me, for example, what were you doing this past August 21st during the total solar eclipse, the Great American Eclipse of the Sun?
.

.
The entire thread speaks for itself. I don't have to repeat it. Are you deaf or blind or just insolent? Loser.
.
Your shrill whining only makes you look worse, if that were possible.

You have to repeat yourself Neil Obstat. Please try to bend the horizontal horizon while your at it.