Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 42

Author Topic: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position  (Read 54447 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #35 on: August 22, 2017, 01:45:26 PM »
Quote from: kiwiboy on August 18, 2017, 02:51:23 PM
now to actually answer the thread.

Being flat earth is not a "position".

It is science. It is what we see with our eyes. That some people before thought the earth was round is understandable because they did not have technology to prove otherwise. Technology that we have nowadays.

Therefore the fruits can only be that of being in conformity to the truth.
.
How wrong can you be, all in one post?
.
Your flat-earthism is not science, because it ignores what we see with our eyes.
.
All you have to do is observe the phases of the moon, and you can readily see that the surface of the earth is spherical.
.
There is no way the moon can have the appearance it does from earth unless we are observing it from the surface of a sphere.
. 
To insist on your flat-earthism in the face of the evidence only proves your determined agenda to ignore the obvious.
.
Logged

Offline Neil Obstat

Re: "Farthest"/Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #36 on: August 22, 2017, 01:55:59 PM »
Quote from: happenby on August 16, 2017, 03:44:03 PM
As scripture and Fathers of the Church teach, there is a dome above the earth with water above it.  Nothing about what you wrote above contains any serious content because science-fictional space is a scam.  
My Douay-Rheims bible with Challoner commentary explains that the firmament mentioned in Genesis refers to the area from the earth's surface to the closest stars, and that the waters separated by the firmament is the water vapor in the clouds separated from the liquid water on the surface of the earth. So maybe you ought to be arguing with Bishop Richard Challoner. Except you're only 2.5 centuries too late! 
Logged

Offline Neil Obstat

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #37 on: August 22, 2017, 01:58:03 PM »
.
The bad fruits of flat-earthism......
.
Logged

Offline hismajesty

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #38 on: August 22, 2017, 02:25:40 PM »
Quote from: Neil Obstat on August 22, 2017, 01:45:26 PM
.
How wrong can you be, all in one post?
.
Your flat-earthism is not science, because it ignores what we see with our eyes.
.
All you have to do is observe the phases of the moon, and you can readily see that the surface of the earth is spherical.
.
There is no way the moon can have the appearance it does from earth unless we are observing it from the surface of a sphere.
.
To insist on your flat-earthism in the face of the evidence only proves your determined agenda to ignore the obvious.
.
can you see this with your eyes?
Logged

Offline Meg

Re: "Farthest"/Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #39 on: August 22, 2017, 03:06:31 PM »
Quote from: Neil Obstat on August 22, 2017, 01:55:59 PM
My Douay-Rheims bible with Challoner commentary explains that the firmament mentioned in Genesis refers to the area from the earth's surface to the closest stars, and that the waters separated by the firmament is the water vapor in the clouds separated from the liquid water on the surface of the earth. So maybe you ought to be arguing with Bishop Richard Challoner. Except you're only 2.5 centuries too late!


How can the water that is separated by the firmament be vapor clouds, when clearly in scripture it says that there are waters ABOVE the firmament, and that the firmament consists of the sun, moon, and stars? Unless you think that vapor clouds are above the sun, moon, and stars?

Genesis, Douay Rheims Challoner version:

https://www.bible.com/bible/55/GEN.1.7.drc1752
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 42
« previous next »