Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position  (Read 57727 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #30 on: August 16, 2017, 03:46:53 PM »
Dome above, from 50's encyclopedia

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #31 on: August 16, 2017, 05:28:58 PM »
Kiwiboy,

While we may disagree with each other on this, I do want to acknowledge you engaging me in a civil and respectful way.  That is not often done when two sides disagree on this forum.

I have seen a number of videos, for and against the theory.  I also have now watched yours.  I am not going to pretend that I get every concept and google, copy and paste rebuttals...i'm sure that has already been done back and forth.  I'll just mention a few things, in your video and with the concept that I have a hard time with.

1) The idea that all the astronauts and were hypnotized or really good actors.
2) The international space station is a holographic projection...so everyone is ok with communication, weather and gps satellites in space, but everything else coming from NASA is false.
3) Being able to prove a couple points doesn't shatter the entire global (pun intended) system.  Proving one thing right or wrong doesn't validate then entire opposite theory.
4) What is being implied here is that anyone that has a higher degree in the sciences is in on this vast conspiracy.  Nautical and aviation instructors, geologist, meteorologist, paleontologist, and scientists dating back hundreds of years have all been in on this monumental conspiracy.

Sorry friend, but I'm going to have to agree to disagree.
 RoughAshlar,
A few points;
-The hypnotism notion is just a theory.
-We never say that there are no scientific discoveries that come from NASA. Throw enough mud (money in this case) and some of it will stick.
-On "proving a couple of points". Do remember the video is an INTRODUCTION. You are suppose to do your own research after that. The lack of curvature is fundamental to the globe earth theory. It COMPLETELY FALLS APART if there is no curvature. As for proving NASA frauds, it puts suspicion over the organization at the very least, but the main strength of the flat earth position is the lack of curvature. See this link for more infor on that http://flatearthtrads.forumga.net/t17-objects-over-the-horizon-proofs
- the scientists being in on the conspiracy point was answered in the video.
It's a pretty radical claim that the earth is flat. Most people are not going to come to it over one Cathinfo post. You have to be interested in doing your own research on it. Otherwise you will just go with the flow of the world.


"Dome"/Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #32 on: August 17, 2017, 01:01:18 AM »
Dome above, from 50's encyclopedia

The ignorance about a major field of earth science, as exemplified by the quoted mention of a "Dome above" (claiming an unidentified "encyclopedia" as its source[†]), is both startling and seriously self-discrediting.

Quote from: (unidentified alleged encyclopedia)
[....] and made exploratory flights over unknown parts of the [Antarctic] continent until Jan. 18, 1956 [....]  These flights proved the inland areas to be featureless in character, with a dome 13,000 feet high at about latitude 80°S., longitude 90°E.

Examination of the crude photo of an "encyclopedia" page, despite it being partially covered by a human finger, makes it clear enough that it's referring to 1 of Antarctica's geologic structures termed a "dome"--elevated ground--whether composed of rock or snow & ice.  But it certainly does not refer to any celestial hemisphere or firmament dome "above" of the kind that seems to be fundamental to preaching the Flat-Earth interpretation of Genesis.

Quote from: (unidentified alleged encyclopedia)
New mountain ranges were located at about latitude 85°S., longitude 50°W[text covered]

Ah, yes: Mountains.  How would the all-encompassing "dome 13,000 feet high",  which the terse introduction seems to claim to be "above" everything else in Antarctica, fit its Mt. Vinson, which rises to an altitude more than 16,000 feet, hmmm?

-------
Note †: Another source on the Web identifies it as an article in an edition of the Encyclopedia Americana, flawed by editing out the phrase "snow and ice" from a quote by report about exploration under the command of "Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd".

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #33 on: August 17, 2017, 03:01:30 PM »
Dude, WHAT are you talking about?

WHO is the "Dude" from whom this newbie "boy" is rudely demanding an explanation?

E.g., the initial quote in my reply #32 on Aug. 17, 2017 (01:01:18 CDT) provides a link to the terse posting by 'happenby' to which I was replying.  Has the newbie not yet noticed that quote boxes that are automatically generated by CathInfo also provide a link to the posting whose text they display?

As for "WHAT", my cited reply is grammatically valid English, free from infusions of potentially confusing nonEnglish Latin, other Indoëuropean, or Semitic vocabulary.

Please try to make your posts somewhat coherent.

Again I ask you, arrogant newbie, WHO?

CathInfo as a forum does not provide threaded display within topics; it's strictly chronological.  So a "coherent" post needs to begin with unambiguous identification of the member to whom you're replying.  Which you failed to do.  Lazy dependence upon readers to accurately identify the member(s) targeted by replies based solely on chronological arrivals of postings in a topic is not acceptable.

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #34 on: August 18, 2017, 02:51:23 PM »
now to actually answer the thread.

Being flat earth is not a "position".

It is science. It is what we see with our eyes. That some people before thought the earth was round is understandable because they did not have technology to prove otherwise. Technology that we have nowadays.

Therefore the fruits can only be that of being in conformity to the truth.