Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position  (Read 54443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #25 on: August 16, 2017, 08:15:37 AM »

I reported the above post for offensive content against purity.
Thanks, you're a pal. Offensive? It's  a flat-earth thread and, as with the meme the error or "impurity" is only one possibility which is eliminated by providing adequate context which was the authorial intent. Apparently honesty and reason are offensive too.
Death by snowflake. Sheesh.

"Farthest"/Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #26 on: August 16, 2017, 01:00:54 PM »
NASA finally telling the truth...
[Attached presentation-slide:]
"We can only fly in Earth orbit:  That is the farthest we can go."
[--]NASA Astronaut Terry Virts 2015

"Truth"!?  It's disingenuous at best to ignore the obvious context given by the year shown: 2015.  It's not as if there's any biiig closet over in the Vertical Assembly Building at Canaveral that's crammed full of Saturn V stages (i.e.: S-IC, S-II, S-IVB), needing only a serious dusting off plus meticulous inspections of o-rings, to move forward with reäsembly to take U.S. astronauts back to the Moon.

[Sheol], thanks to the former U.S. Muslim-in-Chief (r. 2009--2017)[], NASA doesn't even have the less-powerful rockets that were used to launch the Space Shuttle any more [†].  So we must endure the national humiliation of getting our astronauts to-&-from space only when it's convenient for the Russki cosmonauts to let Amerikanskis tag along ("pretty please?").  You remember the Russkis, right?  The superpower that failed in the Space Race because they couldn't get the final bugs out of their own Lunar-launch rockets, which exploded on their pads in Kazakhstan S.S.R.?  The people who produced a copy-cat orbiter dubbled "Shuttleski" (or somesuch), but never successfully launched it--at least not with any crew?   But nowadays there's probably widespread snickering thro'out Mother Russia: "So Amerikanskis won Space Race, da?   Can Amerikanskis fly themselves into space now?  Nyet!  Har, har, har! "

And the presentation-slide quotes a person identified as an "Astronaut", but his name will evoke a "whodat?" from practically everyone who followed the achievements of NASA from Project Mercury thro' Project Apollo; has he even been up yet?   Be that as it may, it's disingenuous at best to make wild leaps of interpretation from his straightforward summary of the disappointingly low limit on U.S. national space-flight, as our Space-Shuttle program was wound down to its conclusion in 2011 [†].  The space-flight situation for the U.S.A. as a sovereign state was even worse at the time of the quote in 2015, having deprived ourselves, 4 years earlier, of the capability to place even 1&#man into Earth-orbit.

DO YOU SEE THE PROBLEM HERE?

I sure as [Sheol] do!

The Baby Boomers who were once merely the "new kids on the block", with their fresh diplomas in aerospace engineering still carrying its original sheep aroma, reässuring them that graduation and hiring into NASA Project Apollo as engineers wasn't just some recurring dream, began to retire.

Then someone, by the grace of God, realized that the last people who understood the engineering drawings and descriptions of Project Apollo were in the process of disappearing.  It wasn't just a matter of obtaining & archiving docuмents--predominately on paper, maybe surviving only as quaint blueprint copies--the crucial issue was understanding which docuмents are important, and when the engineer-archivists have collected the complete set that would be necessary to reliably reconstruct the Saturn rocket stages, instrumentation, orbiter, and lander, including the necessary programming, and confirm all that by launching them beyond low-Earth orbit for a safe round-trip to the Moon.  There's probably lots of important practical knowledge available only in the brains of the otherwise-blue-collar assembly, testing, and transportation workers.

-------
Note †: The final launch being of Atlantis as STS-135, surprisingly long ago, on July 08, 2011 [], per Dave Mosher "07.08.11 11:38 am": "The Last Space Shuttle Launches Safely Into Orbit".  Wired. <https://www.wired.com/2011/07/final-space-shuttle-launch/>

Note : Thus 2_1/2 years (nearly 30 months) into the first term of the former U.S. Muslim-in-Chief.  Perversion of U.S. Constitutional role inferred per Ben Shapiro 8 Jan 2015: "6 Times The Obama Administration Said Its Job Was to Promote Islam".  <http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/08/6-times-the-obama-administration-said-its-job-was-to-promote-islam/>.


Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #27 on: August 16, 2017, 03:37:43 PM »
Where did I say that the internet wouldn't exist on a flat earth? Please point that out to me.
Your thought processes must be seriously mixed up when you reach a conclusion that is neither mentioned explicitly nor implied in my contribution.
Actually, you didn't.  My bad.  I was late that day and snapped back without thoroughly reading.   Apologies for skimming and getting it wrong. 

Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #28 on: August 16, 2017, 03:40:17 PM »
.
You have my deepest sympathy, for it must be terrible to be so miserable all the time.
.
World enslavement, malicious kingpins, indoctrinated masses, what a sorry state.
.
Whatever you do, don't open your eyes and look, because your golden calf flat-earth might collapse.
.
On second thought, it might be a good idea because a collapsed idol is a GOOD fruit.
.
You're living in slavery to a government hell bent on indoctrinating and then killing you, too.  Good luck with that.  

Re: "Farthest"/Re: The Fruits of the Flat Earth Position
« Reply #29 on: August 16, 2017, 03:44:03 PM »
"Truth"!?  It's disingenuous at best to ignore the obvious context given by the year shown: 2015.  It's not as if there's any biiig closet over in the Vertical Assembly Building at Canaveral that's crammed full of Saturn V stages (i.e.: S-IC, S-II, S-IVB), needing only a serious dusting off plus meticulous inspections of o-rings, to move forward with reäsembly to take U.S. astronauts back to the Moon.

[Sheol], thanks to the former U.S. Muslim-in-Chief (r. 2009--2017)[], NASA doesn't even have the less-powerful rockets that were used to launch the Space Shuttle any more [†].  So we must endure the national humiliation of getting our astronauts to-&-from space only when it's convenient for the Russki cosmonauts to let Amerikanskis tag along ("pretty please?").  You remember the Russkis, right?  The superpower that failed in the Space Race because they couldn't get the final bugs out of their own Lunar-launch rockets, which exploded on their pads in Kazakhstan S.S.R.?  The people who produced a copy-cat orbiter dubbled "Shuttleski" (or somesuch), but never successfully launched it--at least not with any crew?   But nowadays there's probably widespread snickering thro'out Mother Russia: "So Amerikanskis won Space Race, da?   Can Amerikanskis fly themselves into space now?  Nyet!  Har, har, har! "

And the presentation-slide quotes a person identified as an "Astronaut", but his name will evoke a "whodat?" from practically everyone who followed the achievements of NASA from Project Mercury thro' Project Apollo; has he even been up yet?   Be that as it may, it's disingenuous at best to make wild leaps of interpretation from his straightforward summary of the disappointingly low limit on U.S. national space-flight, as our Space-Shuttle program was wound down to its conclusion in 2011 [†].  The space-flight situation for the U.S.A. as a sovereign state was even worse at the time of the quote in 2015, having deprived ourselves, 4 years earlier, of the capability to place even 1&#man into Earth-orbit.

I sure as [Sheol] do!

The Baby Boomers who were once merely the "new kids on the block", with their fresh diplomas in aerospace engineering still carrying its original sheep aroma, reässuring them that graduation and hiring into NASA Project Apollo as engineers wasn't just some recurring dream, began to retire.

Then someone, by the grace of God, realized that the last people who understood the engineering drawings and descriptions of Project Apollo were in the process of disappearing.  It wasn't just a matter of obtaining & archiving docuмents--predominately on paper, maybe surviving only as quaint blueprint copies--the crucial issue was understanding which docuмents are important, and when the engineer-archivists have collected the complete set that would be necessary to reliably reconstruct the Saturn rocket stages, instrumentation, orbiter, and lander, including the necessary programming, and confirm all that by launching them beyond low-Earth orbit for a safe round-trip to the Moon.  There's probably lots of important practical knowledge available only in the brains of the otherwise-blue-collar assembly, testing, and transportation workers.

-------
Note †: The final launch being of Atlantis as STS-135, surprisingly long ago, on July 08, 2011 [], per Dave Mosher "07.08.11 11:38 am": "The Last Space Shuttle Launches Safely Into Orbit".  Wired. <https://www.wired.com/2011/07/final-space-shuttle-launch/>

Note : Thus 2_1/2 years (nearly 30 months) into the first term of the former U.S. Muslim-in-Chief.  Perversion of U.S. Constitutional role inferred per Ben Shapiro 8 Jan 2015: "6 Times The Obama Administration Said Its Job Was to Promote Islam".  <http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/08/6-times-the-obama-administration-said-its-job-was-to-promote-islam/>.
As scripture and Fathers of the Church teach, there is a dome above the earth with water above it.  Nothing about what you wrote above contains any serious content because science-fictional space is a scam.