Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The absurdity of Gravity  (Read 271 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 33585
  • Reputation: +29858/-628
  • Gender: Male
The absurdity of Gravity
« on: February 07, 2026, 05:01:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Watch the WHOLE THING, and then comment.

    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48451
    • Reputation: +28592/-5352
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The absurdity of Gravity
    « Reply #1 on: February 07, 2026, 09:42:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Not only is gravity absurd, but it's also a big clue regarding what the Church Fathers actually believed regarding cosmology if you consider that gravity wasn't "invented" until recent times, and the notion that things (and people) could stick upside down to a ball was considered to be utterly preposterous.

    In fact, there was a debate among the Fathers that St. Augustine actually cites, and St. Ambrose alludes to as well, regarding how the earth (meaning world) can be at the center of the (water-filled) universe, because the heavier substances like earth would sink to the "bottom".  St. Augustine cited the opinion that the earth was at the bottom as tenable, since "bottom center" is still center ... and you'll notice his premise that you MUST hold that the earth is at the center of this water-filled universe.

    St. Ambrose, on the other hand, addresses the critics by positing that there's some spinning whirlpool-like action of the water that keeps the earth suspended in the midst of the water ... to counteract its tendency to sink due to its greater density, or else he believed it could just be kept there miraculously.

    But the bottom line is that the Church Fathers had an absolute notion of up and down, where heavier (and more dense) things would sink to the bottom, and they would have considered it preposterous and absurd to posit people sticking to the bottom of a ball.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48451
    • Reputation: +28592/-5352
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The absurdity of Gravity
    « Reply #2 on: February 07, 2026, 09:47:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But this idea that objects can act upon one another at a distance had long been considered this great enigma of science.

    Similarly, scientists are baffled that phenomenon of "quantum physics" (which Eistein wrote off as "spooky") ... except it makes perfect sense if you posit the existence of an ether and/or a "Planck Fabric" where there is not actual empty space between objetion, but some kind of a frabric that interconnects everything.

    Of course, they can't bring back ether after they went to all that trouble getting rid of it after Michelson-Morley to explain why the earth can still move despite the results of that experiment to the contrary.  Yet ... most people don't know that Einstine actually later revived the ether, after having first gotten rid of it.