https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igoizIP7f-g

At the 16 minute mark.

The whole docuмentary might be of your interest, by the way.

.

These people claim to have discovered an entire continent that nobody knew existed.

See, this typifies the problem.  You laugh ... ... before having any idea what their evidence is or is not.

Rational responses might include:

1) I don't know what their evidence is for the additional continent.
2) I've looked at their evidence and find it unconvincing.
3) I've looked at their evidence and find it convincing.

I'm actually in position #1 right now.  I have no idea what evidence they have for this assertion (they don't go into it), but just to laugh out of ignorance makes you look like a fool and makes it quite clear that you're not interested in looking at it with an open mind.

You expose yourself with stuff like this.

Laughing without having seen the evidence is the sign of a small and closed mind.  Maybe in this case you're right, and maybe you're not ... but how many times when you're not right will this same attitude preclude your knowledge of truth, in this or in any other matter?

.

Come on, Ladislaus. Yes, in general we should examine the evidence of something before making judgment, but when something is this ludicrous then it doesn't even need to be entertained. Human beings have been sailing all over the world for six thousand years, and civilized people have mapped the entire world already 500 years ago. Moreover, in recent times with airplanes and satellites and other high-flying devices we have seen whatever can be seen of the earth from high altitude.

The idea that half a dozen amateur YouTubers in Brazil just came along and flew their drone or balloon or whatever in some place that nobody ever flew a drone in before, assuming such a place exists (which it doesn't), and somehow managed to discover some sort of lost world that nobody ever discovered was even there, is just hilarious. What next, they planted some magic beans that grew up into the sky and brought them to an ogre's castle in the clouds? I would have to withhold judgment on that as well until I see the evidence they have for the giant's castle?

Why do you accept some of his testimony but not other parts of it? He says that there is a large land area, as big as the United States, on the other side of the South Pole that hasn’t been explored. He also claimed he was at both the North and South Poles, which FEers say don’t exist. According to him there is no ice wall surrounding the whole surface of the Earth, but rather open sea at the North Pole and a land mass at the South Pole.