My understanding is that Focault pendulum is proof E rotates on axis. It is James Bradley( along w/ Newton) who proves E rev around S... 
Am i the only one in the Forum who has ACTUALLY READ Copernicus? 
Foucault's pendulum is driven, damped, and tuned. Copernicus had more epicycles than Ptolemy and no proof. If you read Newton's "Principia", you may conclude that he was insane, and Newton was chiefly an alchemist who suffered from recurrent bouts of insanity.
Copernican theory in terms of the Sun as some stable center is abandoned, and they have moved on to acentrism, which doesn't make any good sense either. But we can call "acentrism" "heliocentrism" for the sake of the same difference in error, which is the idea that the Earth, a simple body and a sphere, is moving at various astronomical velocities at once to orbit the Sun, because of so-called "gravity", which is not even at all a lateral force of the least measure.
Besides common sense and universal experience, the Bible contradicts Copernicus too.
Topic: Sun and Earth (Read 18294 times)