Everyone on Cathinfo, including you, knows the earth is not a sphere.

Since you did not respond to the point of the post, I'll try one that may be easier for you to understand:

You sure didn't read far because he speaks of the oceans as flat like fields.

Even though we often see St. Augustine claimed here as a believer in flat earth (based on a misunderstanding of his comments on antipodes) in fact he thought the earth was a sphere.  He referred to the earth as aquosa et globosa moles.

From his work De Genesi ad Litteram "On the Literal Meaning of Genesis":

cuм enim totam terram adhuc aqua tegeret, nihil impediebat ut aquosa et globosa moles ex una parte faceret diem lucis praesentia, ex alia noctem lucis absentia, quae in eam partem succederet a tempore vespertino, ex qua lux in aliam declinaret.

"Although water still covered all the earth, nothing was preventing the watery and spherical mass from having day on one side by the presence of light, and on the other side, night by the absence of light, that in the evening, darkness would pass to that side from which light would be turning to the other."

If anyone would like to see it in context here is a pdf for the entire work.  In this work the passage (which is a bit different translation from mine  "the mass of this watery globe") occurs near the top of page 179.

http://www.scottmacdonald.net/genesis/Texts_files/Augustine%20Literal%20Meaning%20of%20Genesis%20bks%201-2.pdf
I hope that those who have been insisting on literalistic interpretations of Scripture will read the entire thing and understand how far their ideas on interpretation are from the teaching of St. Augustine.

This passage from St. Augustine is a clear, unambiguous reference to his belief in a spherical earth.  It requires no special knowledge of the original language or the historical context.  All that one needs to do is read a couple of paragraphs of immediate context and it ought to unmistakable what he is talking about.

"Who would ever say such a thing, when you can see the fields of the sea, spread out level on all sides." -St. Augustine

And yet happenby managed to see it as a "debunking" of globe earth.  She is apparently so blinded by her attachment to her opinion that she is not even capable of understanding what she reads.  And unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident.  She has been shown other quotes from Fathers in which they teach or show their belief in globe earth and she consistently falls back on denying that they say what they say.  She dismisses the correct understanding as "spin" and goes on as if she had never seen it.

You would think you'd be tired of being proven wrong. A notable authority on the saint, says in his books about St. Augustine, that the saint was a flat earther.  Small bio: "Recognized internationally as an authority on Augustine of Hippo, Mr. Ferrari published over 35 works on the 5th-century bishop-philosopher and presented a number of academic papers on him at conferences and conventions. In 1982 he was invited to deliver the annual Saint Augustine Lecture at Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania. A substantial work, Concordantia in libros XIII confessionum S. Aurelii Augustini, the first published concordance to the Skutella text, was published jointly with Rodney H. Cooper, Peter M. Ruddock, and J. Robert Smith in 1991. Ferrari retired from university teaching in 1995. At spring convocation 1998, he will be named first professor emeritus of St. Thomas University.  

She frequently claims that she is basing her view on the Fathers and "globalists" have no support from Catholic sources.  She and others here constantly pretend that they have never been shown quotes from the Fathers demonstrating spherical earth.  Their claims  are meaningless.  Their view, rather than being based on the Fathers, is based on a refusal or inability to understand what they read.

I've been on this for 10 years and have yet to find Catholic Father sources for the globe.  I've requested from you Fatherly sources for your globe, which you cannot produce, because you have no traditional Catholic sources for the globe.  If I'm mistaken and you somehow have them now, please share them.  I have shared flat earth teachings from Scripture, from St. John Chrysostom, Methodius, Cosmas, St. Jerome, Severian, St. Basil, Enoch, Lactanctius, Origen, etc.         

The truth, which they will never admit, is that there were mixed opinions among the Fathers regarding the shape of the earth. There was nothing approaching a consensus on the topic.  If one goes through the list of flatist proof quotes one sees that a large proportion do not even show support for flat earth and just one actually suggests that Christians are obliged to believe it. St. John Damascene accurately summarized the views of the Fathers when he said that some said it was flat and some said it was a globe, but what is important is to know that God is is the creator.

There's no consensus on who believed a particular shape of the earth and I've said that time and again.  I've also repeated that, of the Fathers who taught anything on the shape of the earth, 100% taught flat earth, and they based their teachings in Scripture.  That is a consensus on the actual teachings on the shape of the earth.  Unless of course, you manage to drum up one I haven't yet come across where a Father uses Scripture to prove earth is a ball. Still waiting... 

Those of us who believe the earth is a sphere have just as much a right to claim support from the Fathers.  Unlike the flatists, whose Catholic support ends with the patristic period, we hold the belief which persisted throughout history as the consensus among Catholics, including Doctors and Saints.  While there is no magisterial teaching on the shape of the earth, there is a long strong tradition of Catholics believing in spherical earth.  

On what do you base this 'right' to claim support from the Fathers?  They haven't given you, or your globe, any support.  This isn't an equal rights thing.  You have a right to the Fathers, but they have not provided you a single teaching for the globe, so you don't have a right to claim support from the Fathers. 
No one is talking magisterial teaching. 
As far as most Catholic believing in spherical earth throughout the centuries, please provide the specifics that prove this.
As for the Saints, some thought earth a sphere, but exactly none have brought forth a teaching on it.  You believe that some describe a globe in their visions.  This is far from proven, but even if they did, others, like Anne Catherine Emmerich say its flat.  No consensus. Private revelation.  
   
There is no historical basis for claims that spherical earth was forced on Catholics by Freemasons or NASA.  It is a legitimate part of our heritage as Catholics that goes back to the Fathers

Oh, there is.  And I have plenty of it.  The historical basis for the pagan globe theory being a thorn in the Catholic side going way back, and can be said it is a long time part of our heritage as an unwanted controversy.  The sphere is always found emanating from the dark corners of science where you find these types: Cabalists (Albert Pike), sorcerers (Johannes Kepler), diviners (N Copernicus), atheists (Einstein), Freemasons (NASA), ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs (Newton), political mass murderers (Karl Marx),

All these men were sphere earth promoters in a really big way.  In fact, Karl Marx, an avid spherical earther, actually thanked Copernicus for giving him a scientific premise for Communism/Marxism.