Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE  (Read 6254 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mat183

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 381
  • Reputation: +145/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
« Reply #30 on: October 22, 2025, 05:47:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
  • Some of us know why Matthew deleted my inquiry to Gladius.  Yeah, the usual circling of the wagons when the heat gets turned on.

    Offline WorldsAway

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 930
    • Reputation: +739/-88
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #31 on: October 22, 2025, 06:22:23 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Some of us know why Matthew deleted my inquiry to Gladius.  Yeah, the usual circling of the wagons when the heat gets turned on.
    Calumny or detraction can be committed in the form of a question 
    John 15:19  If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.


    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 381
    • Reputation: +145/-93
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #32 on: October 22, 2025, 06:39:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Calumny or detraction can be committed in the form of a question
    And sometimes there can be justification for such questions, not for calumny, but for detraction.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33205
    • Reputation: +29488/-606
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #33 on: October 22, 2025, 08:09:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And sometimes there can be justification for such questions, not for calumny, but for detraction.

    The only reason to expose private sins to the public is "the common good". How was the the common good served by your recent posts?
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33205
    • Reputation: +29488/-606
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #34 on: October 22, 2025, 08:10:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Some of us know why Matthew deleted my inquiry to Gladius.  Yeah, the usual circling of the wagons when the heat gets turned on.

    Nothing that dramatic. I deleted your post because it was UNCALLED FOR and I didn't like the direction this thread was going. Namely, into base ad-hominems, personal attacks, and general ugliness. I was "moderating" the thread; a curious thing for a Moderator to do, I know.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33205
    • Reputation: +29488/-606
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #35 on: October 22, 2025, 08:16:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What sins have I accused Gladius of?  If anything, he accuses himself?  cf. Matt 7:16
    ...
    I know him.  I know what it's like.

    So, what you're saying is, I was 100% right that there was an iceberg under the surface; you know Gladius from church or something, and you seem to have a major beef with him.

    You aren't just having a random conversation on a message board, with Gladius being a mere member you disagree with.

    My point: CathInfo isn't a backdrop or "setting" for your vendetta against Gladius (or anyone else). If you want to seek after someone you already know, with the goal of fighting with them, then do it somewhere else. If you know Gladius from church, work, or your neighborhood, go fight him IRL and leave CathInfo out of it.

    In other words, whatever "outside CathInfo" source you know Gladius from -- go fight with him there. CathInfo is the place for working out CathInfo-generated strife (arguments, dislikes) only -- not strife brought it from outside.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 381
    • Reputation: +145/-93
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #36 on: October 22, 2025, 01:28:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • The only reason to expose private sins to the public is "the common good". How was the the common good served by your recent posts?
    Whatever I supposedly exposed, if anything, was for the good of Gladius and if it nips things in the bud then by extension it is for the common good since he is a big actor on this forum.  If there is a bully on the playground (often surrounded and supported by some admiring toadies) it's sometimes best to knock the ....out of him.  I don't appreciate his projections on me.  It's not that I am oversensitive as he would like to claim, it's that I'm not about to put up with his pretentious "all knowing" mind games.  Lad, by the way, is notorious for pulling the same kind of shenanigans.  He apparently thinks it's OK to refer to me as a turd, i.e. a piece of shit.  He gets away with that common behavior apparently because he is the top dog 47 thousand plus mega poster boy on CathInfo.

    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 381
    • Reputation: +145/-93
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #37 on: October 22, 2025, 01:30:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • . I was "moderating" the thread; a curious thing for a Moderator to do, I know.
    Obviously, totally within your right to do so!


    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 381
    • Reputation: +145/-93
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #38 on: October 22, 2025, 01:32:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • So, what you're saying is, I was 100% right that there was an iceberg under the surface; you know Gladius from church or something, and you seem to have a major beef with him.

    You aren't just having a random conversation on a message board, with Gladius being a mere member you disagree with.

    My point: CathInfo isn't a backdrop or "setting" for your vendetta against Gladius (or anyone else). If you want to seek after someone you already know, with the goal of fighting with them, then do it somewhere else. If you know Gladius from church, work, or your neighborhood, go fight him IRL and leave CathInfo out of it.

    In other words, whatever "outside CathInfo" source you know Gladius from -- go fight with him there. CathInfo is the place for working out CathInfo-generated strife (arguments, dislikes) only -- not strife brought it from outside.
    I hope your friend Gladius is listening.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47374
    • Reputation: +28036/-5238
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #39 on: October 22, 2025, 05:48:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • as a turd, i.e. a piece of shit.  He gets away with that common behavior apparently because he is the top dog 47 thousand plus mega poster boy on CathInfo.


    Perhaps you could ask your friend Grok about the fact that calling someone a turd and a POS are entirely different things, radically different in their connotations, with the former referring to someone who's a nuisance, obnoxious, annoying, a troublemaker ... the latter depraved and wicked, rotten to the core.

    So your strawmanning my having called you turd into pretending that it means I called you a POS is dishonest and slanderous.

    But carry on with your turd-like behavior.

    Nor is there anything close to resembling any equivalent between my calling you a turd based on your anonymous screen persona and the content of your posts, and you attempting to make attacks on the real person's character.  It would like equating you referring to me as obnoxious (here on the forum) and then you making the assertion that I'm a drug addict or adulterers.  Not even in the same ballpark, buddy.


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12790
    • Reputation: +8142/-2505
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #40 on: October 22, 2025, 06:01:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Turd or ‘tard?  


    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 381
    • Reputation: +145/-93
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #41 on: October 22, 2025, 07:50:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2

  • Perhaps you could ask your friend Grok about the fact that calling someone a turd and a POS are entirely different things, radically different in their connotations, with the former referring to someone who's a nuisance, obnoxious, annoying, a troublemaker ... the latter depraved and wicked, rotten to the core.

    So your strawmanning my having called you turd into pretending that it means I called you a POS is dishonest and slanderous.

    But carry on with your turd-like behavior.

    Nor is there anything close to resembling any equivalent between my calling you a turd based on your anonymous screen persona and the content of your posts, and you attempting to make attacks on the real person's character.  It would like equating you referring to me as obnoxious (here on the forum) and then you making the assertion that I'm a drug addict or adulterers.  Not even in the same ballpark, buddy.
    You can find a zillion different dictionary references that include the meaning of turd to be a piece of excrement.  Excrement is shit in case you didn't know, but of course you do know.  You may or may not have been referring me to as a piece of shit.  I've been called a lot worse, but you may well have been and by what you have said so far you have not proven otherwise.  In any event, I'm not a mind reader like you and your buddy Gladius act on various occasions.  As the mega 47 thousand plus poster boy on CathInfo you have shown yourself over and over and over to be an extremely obnoxious and pretentious Mr. know it all character.  

    Over the years you have obviously developed a real expertise at defending your proud reputation and by covering your posterior by smearing people when need be in the process.  You have been repeatedly called out by people for this, but it apparently has had no real effect on your proud childish behavior.

    Just the other day you called me a "mindless buffoon."  That's typical for you.  What the ..... kind of language/name calling is that on a leading traditional Catholic forum that touts the unspoken rule of charity.  After more than 47 thousand posts on this forum you would think the mega poster boy -- and I say that for better or for worse -- would have learned to discipline his tongue a bit better, but no that is part of your standard mocking uncharitable fashion/mode that you resort to against your perceived opposition.  I don't expect anything I say here will make you any more civil, let alone charitable, in your carrying on on this forum.  Afterall, you remain on obnoxious overdrive after more than 47,000 posts.

    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 381
    • Reputation: +145/-93
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Speculative Reasoning for FE and for GE
    « Reply #42 on: October 22, 2025, 07:52:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Turd or ‘tard? 

    How about toadie or syncophant if the shoe fits.