CathInfo.com

Always admitted in another thread that he doesn't know much about science and can't argue/defend Sungenis' positions.  So he just defends Dr S, as a friend. 

It's strange that some people are so opposed to evidence. They say, "scientific authority says" as if modern science has any credibility left.  There was never a need for anyone to defend anybody because the argument is against lies coming from the white coats of modern science. Flat earthers have been consistent in these discussions on CI: Don't make yourself the target with self promotion argumentation and put up credible evidence that doesn't beg the question.           

Great video from Flat Earth Dave (alas, in an interview with the "Syncretism Society", but the information is independent of that context) where in rapid-fire fashion he explains the movements of the sun.  Demonstrates the rules of perspective, shows footage of sunset taken by soldier in Afghanistan (over very dry desert) showing sun shrinking as it recedes (can't happen with 93-million-mile-away huge sun), also shows the image of the apparent sunset zoomed in on to show that it's still well above the horizon line.  I wish he had added his video (taken from a drone) of the sun just fading away into nothing without going down at all.  Yet you have some posters here who claim that all you have to do is look at a sunset to see the earth is a globe.  Nonsense.  If the sun is a huge object 93 million miles away, moving a couple thousand miles farther away as the earth rotates would not cause it to shrink noticeably in size.  It would only be .006% farther away in a 1/4 rotation of the "globe", so would not shrink.