Yes, indeed. Sungenis does cite the findings of the Planck probe. (Are Flat Earthers against those findings?) And why exactly does Sungenis do this?
The European Space Agency, in cooperation with NASA sent up the Planck probe in 2009. The findings of the probe did not support the Big Bang model as NASA, no doubt, was hoping it would. The Big Bang theory and the cosmological principle were actually falsified by the 2013 Planck data. To cut to the chase -- the Planck data dramatically support a geocentric universe. There is no getting around that fact. So... thank you ESA and thank you NASA! God can use even his enemies such as NASA and the ESA to show forth the truth!
He does a lot more than just "cite the findings of the Planck probe".
His argument against FEs' rejection of NASA in his anti-FE book is logically faulty. He asserts (as a strawman) that FEs hold that NASA lies about everything. I don't think any FE holds this. But what he misses is the evidentiary principle (used in courts) of
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. If a witness has been caught lying, even once, the problem is that the rest of his testimony is no longer admissible in court, since even though he MIGHT be telling the truth about something, you can't know whether he's lying about any given statement. Because NASA has been caught lying, and perpetrating fraud, nothing that NASA produces or claims can be used as proof of globe. Sungenis also minimizes NASA's fraud, admitting only a single example of NASA fraud (an example of a photoshopped earth on the moon-landing pictures), that he trivializes as a "foible". In point of fact, one could fill volumes larger than Sungenis' own books with provable NASA fraud. If NASA's capable of the monumental lie of faking the moon landings, who knows what else they're lying about?
Add to this the fact that NASA, and in fact the entire mainstream scientific establishment, are driven by an atheistic agenda. Sungenis actually does a good job of docuмenting this in his works on geocentrism, but then somehow NASA is serving mankind now with God's truth when it attacks FE. One poster here put it pretty well in saying that Sungenis is attempting to ingratiate himself with NASA, in an attempt to gain some "credibility". "See, I'm not a crazy like these FEs. Take me seriously." Newsflash ... NASA will never take geocentrism seriously. They might give him a momentary high-five as he tries to beat up on FEs, but then will immediately turn around to start pummeling him against. Also, Sungenis admits that Kolbe Center commissioned (aka paid) him to come up with an anti-FE work, so the question was begged right out of the gate. Kolbe Center and groups like Answers in Genesis are all hostile to FE as they attempt to ingratiate themselves with the mainstream and join in the chorus of "Take us seriously. We're not some crazy FEs." For the first time in history, NASA and Big Tech are working together in serving the interests of mankind, trying to protect us all from error.
Most FEs used to support Sungenis' work and despite our differences regarding the shape of the earth, believed that we were "on the same side". Catholics FEs all uphold the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture. That's the only "side" that really counts. Rest should be details and a disagreement of friends. Instead, he throws in his lot with the God-hating atheistic (and Satanic occult ... just look at NASA's history) and joins with them in the attack on FE.
Based on a video in which he actually came across as respectful of FE, even if disagreeing with it, I bought his book, hoping to get some of the best arguments against FE (since I'm honestly just looking for the truth, which very few Globers seem to be doing). From page one, Sungenis is insulting and deriding FEs, making strawman arguments against them, etc. Had he respectfully disagreed, I would have had no problem with it. But his derrogatory polemical style is unacceptable and can only turn people who had been supporting him into enemies, while he tries to make friends with NASA. It was downright shameful.
Topic: Space is fake and gαy (Read 37461 times)