I really expected more from you, cassini. There were no "thousands" of conspirators. NASA (I worked there for nearly 5 years) is about a compartmentalized as any organization can get. Very few individuals have any knowledge of the bigger picture, and most are consigned to working on one small part of the whole. I wrote software for a thing that was the size of a large microwave oven, and had no idea about what it was even a part of, nor did the people who worked on the hardware aspect. But, yes, there was a man who was a military guard who came out on his deathbed with a confession that he stood guard over the studio where the moon landings were filmed.
I find it perplexing that people like yourself and Sungenis promote NASA when they're the most hostile opponents of geocentrism that you'll ever find. You could write volumes larger than Sunenis' massive tomes on provable NASA fraud.
But these lame arguments about the thousands of conspirator are akin to the nonsense about why people don't fall off the edge of a Flat Earth. They're really beneath your intellect, and therefore it's a sign of some brainwashing.
I asked a very interesting question. I asked if there were even ONE of the thousands who worked for NASA who came out to tell the truth? You could have answered with 'yes, there was a man who was a military guard who came out on his deathbed with a confession that he stood guard over the studio where the moon landings were filmed.' To accuse me of promoting NASA with this question is a bit of an exaggeration.
Given the lies that are coming out about so much these days, such as the reasons Americas used to go to war everywhere, it is very possible that America also lied about a moon landing to get the better of the Russians who were also bragging about going to the moon. That said, whether they did or not really doesn't affect the lives of many. There are far more important aspects of our lives on Earth today that need correction.
My interest and purpose in defending geocentrism is the effect it had in eliminating the Supernatural creation by God. Unfortunately to do so exposes popes and clergy running the Catholic Church from the 18th century as promoting what their predecessors defined as formal heresy. Whether men got to the moon or not is nothing compared to the exposure of the heresy that led to Modernism, the heresy of all heresies as Pope St Pius X called it, totally unaware that he too was involved when designating Fr G. Hagen SJ, a gold-medal heliocentrist as head of the Vatican observatory. To expose facts like these does not go down too well with 'traditional' Catholics who think all before Vatican II were faultless. Only on CIF is this truth allowed. You see wee defend the teaching of all the Fathers and popes of 1616 and 1633 but to do that one has to expose the U-turn that began in 1741.