Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Space is fake and gαy  (Read 109308 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Space is fake and gαy
« Reply #95 on: July 27, 2022, 05:18:10 PM »
I agree with the title of this thread...space is definitely gαy.  :laugh1:
Super hecking gαy



Re: Space is fake and gαy
« Reply #96 on: July 27, 2022, 06:17:28 PM »
Catholics know that "our Columbus"( to quote Pope Leo XII-- who is Higher Authority than anyone on planet) is Reveler Of The Globe..... :popcorn:
Sorry-- should read Leo XIII... :cowboy:


Re: Space is fake and gαy
« Reply #97 on: July 30, 2022, 12:33:28 PM »
I was sent this. An "image from the James Webb telescope" :facepalm:

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Space is fake and gαy
« Reply #98 on: July 30, 2022, 01:18:23 PM »
I was sent this. An "image from the James Webb telescope" :facepalm:

I find it interesting that they say it was damaged by small debris.  So they spent $10 billion on this and couldn't engineer some protection against something that would be almost inevitable, to encounter some small debris?  If it were real (rather than some money-laundering operation), people should get fired over this.

But the interesting part is that they claimed now that, due to the damage, they would have to submit the images to digital "processing" to clean them up.  That sounds like a smokescreen in case someone detects the signs of digital manipulation of the images ("oh, yeah, that's because of the damage").

Re: Space is fake and gαy
« Reply #99 on: July 30, 2022, 01:28:34 PM »
I find it interesting that they say it was damaged by small debris.  So they spent $10 billion on this and couldn't engineer some protection against something that would be almost inevitable, to encounter some small debris?  If it were real (rather than some money-laundering operation), people should get fired over this.

But the interesting part is that they claimed now that, due to the damage, they would have to submit the images to digital "processing" to clean them up.  That sounds like a smokescreen in case someone detects the signs of digital manipulation of the images ("oh, yeah, that's because of the damage").
We sent things through the supposedly crowded asteroid belt but all of a sudden a spaceship built with lots of gold is damaged in a way most previous supposedly interstellar craft aren't. I thought space was supposed to be super empty ;)