I know that flat earthers don't like to stick to common definitions, but this is just ridiculous.
Not at all. You've repeatedly presented some of the shoddiest "evidence" out there, simple pictures without any context (where, when, what, how, who, no measurements or facts) and which could easily entail varous atmospheric phenomena, but you present them as proof, while at the same time you simply and gratuitously declare "refraction" for the images which show things that shouldn't be seen given the distances involved ... without any evidence. You feel as if you merely need to say the word "refraction" and you've won the argument. So "refraction" only applies to FE evidence but never to the ones that appear to support GE? In every case, the FEs give all the facts and measurements while there's never any context given to the GE ones. You've already decided that the earth must be a globe and are begging the question rather than openly considering the subject. That is textbook confirmation bias, where you cling to things that do not prove your position as if they were proof and dismiss any and all evidence to the contrary. I started a lengthy thread where I went through both sides of the argument thoroughly and explained how I arrived at my conclusion. You have never once given any serious consideration to the FE arguments and evidence but simply dismiss them out of hand. Confirmation bias and bad will.
Topic: Space is fake and gαy (Read 98635 times)