Also note the, nigh-immediate, derail instigated by them, like a magic trick.

"No no, don't look at or think about the actual topic, or what it could portend. Look here, I'm insulting you in between irrelevancies, like Myrna's Catholicity...."

You're very dishonest.
.
.
Happenby has given you many, many flat earth quotes from the REAL Church Fathers.

What keeps this "sequitur" from being a "non" exactly?

You're very dishonest.
.
.
Happenby has given you many, many flat earth quotes from the REAL Church Fathers.

I should add thanks however that you tip the scales of certitude towards the conclusion that FE is another religion and/or of the credo of same.

"Thank you."

Please all, do carry on; you're being very helpful. Yes Nutmeg?

Do you believe all Infallibly Defined Dogmas’ of the Catholic Church without innovation(s)?

The majority of people on Cathinfo.com who refuse to believe that the earth is flat also do not believe all Infallibly Defined Dogmas’ of the Catholic Church without innovation(s).

With all honesty, every real Catholic on this website has to answer this question with a resounding "no", because The Catholic Church doesn't have any "Dogmas' ". This is a weird question to ask over and over again, as it is not even proper English. Others have pointed this out, so you realy need to drop the apostrophe. If you drop the apostraphe and make the word "Dogmas" instead of "Dogmas' " people would actually start saying "yes"!

Dogmas' do not exist...

The Guardian was kinda asking the same question...

Flat-Earthers are back: 'It’s almost like the beginning of a new religion'

Link here for article...

BTW, an earlier video I posted on another thread was taken from this article.

Thanks. Those "odd timings" are, well, odd.

With all honesty, every real Catholic on this website has to answer this question with a resounding "no", because The Catholic Church doesn't have any "Dogmas' ". This is a weird question to ask over and over again, as it is not even proper English. Others have pointed this out, so you realy need to drop the apostrophe. If you drop the apostraphe and make the word "Dogmas" instead of "Dogmas' " people would actually start saying "yes"!

Dogmas' do not exist...

.
I keep waiting for what it is that belongs to the unnamed "Dogmas' " but they haven't said what they are.
.
Dogmas' what?
.

The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other government "space agencies" show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos.

.
This is what, the 10th time you've posted this idol worship bilge scuм of yours?
.
The horizon does not appear "perfectly flat" 360 degrees around the observer. It appears as a giant circle in the distance, which is a continuous curve and therefore not flat.
.

The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it. 

.
Wrong, again. The horizon does not rise to the eye level of the observer, especially when altitude is gained.
.

The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.

.
Wrong, again. As usual. Water and other fluids conform to the contours of their container. 
.
You are at least consistent in your insanity. Congratulations!  :applause:
.