.
Have you managed to ask yourself why the video shows the moon looking like a sphere then? 
.
Or why the artist likes to misappropriate alternative views of the moon when we're always looking from the earth?
.
Someone with basic thinking skills ought to have a talk with this "artist." 

An eclipse in FE?

Shadows effect how we see things.  

 

I'm so happy you posted this because I'd seen it before, but couldn't find it for later viewing.  What this guy is saying is not only true if you try the experiments yourself, it is both simple to understand, as well as a next level intellectual consideration. Art is such a fascinating and heady mind candy for many reasons, but this video specifically conveys details regarding the way light works on spherical things. Observing the behavior of shadows and their operation is undeniable, and unhindered by indoctrination, one can quickly understand the revealing mechanics of shadows.  It brings art and science together to demonstrate the truth about creation. I've studied the moon for many hours drawing on information from this video and realized how the crisp edges of it's outer perimeter as well as the way the shadow moves across it in its phases prove it cannot be globular.  Fantastic!      

.
You are entirely wrong, as usual.
.
The so-called artist fails to take the same position of viewing that we do from earth.
He shows examples of how shadows on a sphere curve -- but they do not curve when the light source is directly behind the viewer.
When we see lunar eclipses, the sun is always 180 degrees behind us in the direction opposite the moon.
.
Maybe this is too simple for flat-earthdom syndromers to grasp. Figures.
.
Flat-earthdom syndromers will believe anything if they can make it fit their fantasyland false-god golden-calf subjectivism.
.
What used to be the most ridiculous thread now becomes proof positive of the ridiculousness of flat-earthdom syndrome!! HAHAHAHAHA
.

.
BTW you missed another excellent opportunity to measure the angle between the sun and the moon at the first quarter this past week.
.
But then, to do that, you would have to want to know the truth, which you don't want to know.
.
If you really wanted to know, you would be ready to do another experiment during the full moon in a few days from now.
.
But, as usual, you have no interest in the truth.
.
You'll get out a thermometer and measure the air temperature but say it's the temperature of the moonlight. Duuh.
Wrong experiment! 
.
The correct experiment involves a 2" iron pipe and a 2x2 tripod, but you don't know what I'm talking about so what's the use?
.

Also, the artist demonstrates that a spherical object does not cast a curved shadow which is what we see on the moon.

You assume the sun is responsible for the light of the moon when you say the sun is always 180 degrees behind us in the direction opposite the moon.  The sun's light reflected off the moon has not been proven.  The moon is it's own light for the most part, receiving 1/7 of it's light from the sun, at least according to Enoch.  Whether Enoch is proven correct or not really doesn't matter since it isn't proven the moon gets it's light from the sun according to modern science. Especially knowing that the light from the moon is different than the light of the sun, both in effect and in content.  Sunlight is warm and golden.  Moonlight is cool and silvery.  Sunlight nourishes, moonlight corrupts. There are reasons to accept Enoch's version and no reason to accept NASA's or modern science's.      

.
Careful with your tinfoil hat
.

.

Shadows effect how we see things.  

.

.
Implying that shadows are what gives the optic nerve proper function is without basis.
.
But that's nothing new, since practically everything flat-earthdom syndromers have to say is without basis in truth or rational thought.