You said:
1. My advice for you is to stop leading souls into error by your inaccurate interpretations. Remember, you are accountable for every word! "NONE BY PRETEXT or REASON of"......NOT solely NONE!
Actually, it is "none". And the Pope adds, to be certain it is understood that NONE dare even DREAM of interfering with a conclave, he includes "by pretext, or reason of..." stating every possible eventuality with these possibilities.
Your interpretation suggests that the statement that actually says "none of the cardinals" thus possibly means, "some" or perhaps even just one, exclusion. That is illogical. None is none. There is no barring of voters, nor candidates, from assuming office of Pope once the cardinals begin the process. They call it pretext because any politicking is not tolerated. God handles it at that point, protects the Church if a bad guy gets in, He allows for a council to remove whoever sneaked in to do his own will as some have done. Otherwise, the process can be stalled ad infinitum as usurping cardinals could point fingers and yell "heretic!" every time they don't get what they want.
Popes have done plenty of damage in the past, of that there is no doubt. To suggest (as sedes assert) that you know personally, or that history somehow proves, that none of the bad popes were heretics, is so ridiculous as to suggest malice. A person after his own will to the detriment of the Church is by definition, in some kind of heresy, for heresy means "to choose". Manifest, material, formal, whatever the brand of heresy, it remains for the Church to make the final proclamation on such a man accused, because the verdict affects the entire world of people. Without that verdict, you only have varying opposing opinions. Without the Church's final say, the laity cannot possibly be sure what to think or who to follow. See today's Church.