So after reading the book "Geocentrism For Dumskies and Smart Kids" by Dr. Robert Sungenis, which presented conclusive evidence of modern science not only having no proof for Heliocentrism, but in fact a lot of things pointing towards a Geocentric universe which they don't want to accept out of arrogance, not having to admit that the Church was right and of course not needing to acknowledge the existence of God.

A few questions remain though.

• Is it correct to assume that the complete universe is not only rotating around Earth every day, but also going in a circle around Earth at a radius of 93 million miles (distance between Sun and Earth)? This would be needed to explain observations like stellar parallax (we can observe stars changing their relative positions over the year, which Heliocentrists try to use as "proof" of a moving Earth).
• The Sun rotates it's ecliptic around Earth by 23.5° for each season (it changes the plane of its orbit). Do the planets follow the Sun, i.e. keep orbiting the Sun? I assume so.

I hope someone knows a thing or two about the subject.

A few questions remain though.

• Is it correct to assume that the complete universe is not only rotating around Earth every day, but also going in a circle around Earth at a radius of 93 million miles (distance between Sun and Earth)? This would be needed to explain observations like stellar parallax (we can observe stars changing their relative positions over the year, which Heliocentrists try to use as "proof" of a moving Earth).
• The Sun rotates it's ecliptic around Earth by 23.5° for each season (it changes the plane of its orbit). Do the planets follow the Sun, i.e. keep orbiting the Sun? I assume so.

I hope someone knows a thing or two about the subject.

 
Ok Dankward. Yes, it is correct that the universe rotates around the Earth every day. The sun and stars are united in this rotation around a fixed Earth every say. Moreover, this combination spins like a giroscope that causes the seasons once a year and recession every 25920 years. The cosmic bodies do not move in circles nor ellipsers but by way of Cassinian ovals.

Yes, the planets are the Sun's moons and move with it as it goes from Equator to Tropic of Cancer and back to the Equator and then down to the Tropic of Capricorn and then back up over the Equator non stop every year.
I will be glad to answer any more questions Dankward.

Many thanks for your answers, cassini. I'd like to clear some things up. It's a bit hard for me to visualize this, especially the gyroscope part.

So which is correct:

- Earth in the center, Sun orbiting Earth, universe (all of the planets, stars, galaxies) orbiting the Sun or
- Earth in the center, Sun orbiting Earth, universe orbiting Earth but it's center is always the Earth

I assume that if the celestial bodies move in Cassinian ovals, that would explain stellar parallax as well, as bodies are changing their relative positions depending on their cosmic r² ?

Regarding the seasons: Is it only the Sun and it's moons, or the complete universe oscillating up and down? As far as I understood it's the former, we'd surely notice if the latter was the case .

The Earth floats without any movement at the centre of the universe. The sun (with its planet moons) rotates every day around the Earth, moving up and down from the Equator to the tropic of Cancer and then down to the tropic of Capricorn once a year to bring day and nights and seasons on Earth.

Kepler, who was a heliocentrist, used Tycho de Brahe's maths of orbits said orbits were ellipses. Newton used Kepler's ellipses maths to work out his theory of gravitation said to be the LAWS of their solar system. But in Newton's time, Domenico Cassini, God's astronomer, studied the movements and found orbits of the sun and planets are not ellipses but Cassinian ovals. But the Freemasons of the Royal Society of London ignored Cassini's findings to keep their Newtonian heliocentrism.

Later it was found Cassinian ovals are related to Phi, the same maths that describe leaves, shells etc. But more thasn that they are also related to positive electromagnetic waves.
Stellar Parallax. If the Earth orbits the sun a parallax should be found. Pick something to look at. Now walk in as circle. an object between you and your chosen something will look like it goes in a circle. When partallax was found they said it was because the Earth orbits the sun. But if the stars circle the sun as geocentrism says, the same parallax will be found.

Wow, Dankward. your last brilliant question is something I never thought of. The seasons are caused by the annual movement of the sun with its planet moons up and down from the Equator. The stars, which are concorded with the sun, as stellar aberration shows, could well move as the sun does. They are so far away this movement is not measurable.

That's an interesting connection to the Freemasons of London, how fitting once again. They are still on just the same mission as back then.

So it looks like the Cassinian ovals fit really well into the grand scheme of things. Like another signature God left in his creation.

Thanks, yes, that's what I initially wanted to know about the movement of the stars and stellar parallax. So if we used the Sun as frame of reference, the Earth, the planets and all the other bodies would appear to circle the Sun in concentric Cassinian ovals.

Ah, so we wouldn't (or don't) notice the stars going up and down. I intuitively thought a parallax effect could be observed, but was probably wrong. I'm just starting my journey into astronomy. Might buy a telescope once I know what to keep an eye on

Astronomy is a very complex subject Dankward. I have looked up at the stars and realised the genius needed to figure out their movements as we understand them.

It began with Ptolemy who saw the sun, moon, planets and stars rotate in circles around the Earth.
Then came Pythagoras who believed the Earth was a planet that circles with all the other bodies around the sun.
Then came Tyco de Brahe who saw the stars and sun with its planets rotating around the Earth. Next came Copernicus with his circular heliocentric system, and finally
Kepler took De Brahe's measurements and reached a compromise ellipse heliocentric order.

Cassini checked the lot and came up with oval movements with the Earth at the centre of all. As you might be aware the heliocentric physicists have for the last 150 years been trying for the 'theory of everything', trying to find a relationship between gravity (what makes things move in space) and electromagnetism. Anyone who would find it would of course win the Nobel Prize.
Having ignored Domenico Cassini's astronomical findings because he was a geocentrist, only through his ovals could the Nobel Prize be won. In the Cassinian order of the universe, all motion is connected with electromagnetism.

Now study your Genesis, in it it says in the beginning God created LIGHT. Now what is LIGHT. It is one of many effects of electromagnetism. And that is how God made light BEFORE He created the sun. St Augustine said there could not be light without the sun, He was wrong.

It also means that the way to move the sun, moon and stars was also created before they were created. Aquinas said the Angels move the stars but maybe they just make sure they keep them from straying from their electromagnetic paths. This explains how year after year the sun, moon and stars do exactly the same thing, serve the Earth.

That telescope you are thinking of buying. All you will see is stars and the few planets a little better. You will soon get tired of that so I would save your money.  

Interesting insights, thanks cassini.

If anything, I would've bought a telescope with a camera and tracking features to create beautiful captures and stack images digitally to visualize more than one can see with the naked eye, like galaxies, nebulae etc.

Yes Dankward, you could try to track the Zodiac.

‘Because God created the material universe as an immense parable fraught with supernatural meaning, there exists an intimate relation between faith and the sky. “The heavens show forth the glory of God, and the firmament declareth the work of his hands.” (Ps 18:2). “Who telleth the number of the stars: and calleth them all by their names.” (Ps 146:4). “Shalt thou be able to join together the shining stars the Pleiades, or canst thou stop the turning about of Arcturus?” (Job 38:31-32). “Lift up your eyes on high and see who hath created these things: who bringeth out their host by number, and calleth them all by their names: by the greatness of his might, and power, not one of them was missing.” (Psa 40:26).’ --- Solange Hertz.