-
Here is footage recorded 3 hours ago in high definition from the ISS.
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/107709163
At the 9:00 minute mark, you can see an EXTREME curvature of the horizon line. We know this rate of curvature is NOT the edge of the earth nor its curvature, because we know the size of the hurricane in the righthand side of the frame is only several hundred miles wide.
Also, you will see the curvature of this same horizon line flatten out significantly at the 23:00 minute mark.
And, you can even watch the sun "set" at the 43:00 minute mark, taking its light with it: showing the sun to be close and "hot" on the water and clouds.
-
Here is footage recorded 3 hours ago in high definition from the ISS.
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/107709163
At the 9:00 minute mark, you can see an EXTREME curvature of the horizon line. We know this rate of curvature is NOT the edge of the earth nor its curvature, because we know the size of the hurricane in the righthand side of the frame is only several hundred miles wide.
Also, you will see the curvature of this same horizon line flatten out significantly at the 23:00 minute mark.
And, you can even watch the sun "set" at the 43:00 minute mark, taking its light with it: showing the sun to be close and "hot" on the water and clouds.
So, how do we know that this isn't CGI?
-
For even more fun, you can click on this recording from a few hours ago:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/107698665
It will show you (at the 59:00 minute mark) a rate of curvature of horizon and a shore line that are impossible on a ball earth.
Why is the link invisible??
Cut & paste and remove the spaces:
http://www.
ustream.tv/recorded/107698665
-
Here's the original recording for the hurricane:
http://www.
ustream.tv/recorded/107709163
-
So, how do we know that this isn't CGI?
All the globe images are CGIS'; if you study the globe images long enough, you will begin to recognize a CGI from a photograph. ;) The space station doesn't exist.
-
All the globe images are CGIS'; if you study the globe images long enough, you will begin to recognize a CGI from a photograph. ;) The space station doesn't exist.
If I study the wall long enough, I will begin to recognize Elvis, no offense. An alternative I've not yet seen is perfectly licit, non-nefarious enhancement/cleanup.
I'm not sure if you're having us on but, if the station doesn't exist, they why does this thread?
" ;)"
On an unrelated note, well mostly, why does "Winky" look more like "Gassy"?
-
If I study the wall long enough, I will begin to recognize Elvis, no offense. An alternative I've not yet seen is perfectly licit, non-nefarious enhancement/cleanup.
I'm not sure if you're having us on but, if the station doesn't exist, they why does this thread?
" ;)"
On an unrelated note, well mostly, why does "Winky" look more like "Gassy"?
The reason why you can't recognize a CGI from a photograph, you are easily fooled by freemasons.
-
The reason why you can't recognize a CGI from a photograph, you are easily fooled by freemasons.
"The reason..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHsPMxe7bOk
-
Just curious, Three questions here:
1. If there is no ISS, how come it is observable from a telescope from Walmart?
2. If are rooting your beliefs in Catholic doctrine and scripture, what are the names of the traditional priests/bishops are teaching this today? Are they SSPX, former SSPX, SSPV, independent, or an entire order? What are your thoughts on the priest that disagree with your conclusions?
3. Were any of you in or the ones filming the video debating this subject with Father Pfeiffer that was floating on this site?
-
Just curious, Three questions here:
1. If there is no ISS, how come it is observable from a telescope from Walmart?
2. If are rooting your beliefs in Catholic doctrine and scripture, what are the names of the traditional priests/bishops are teaching this today? Are they SSPX, former SSPX, SSPV, independent, or an entire order? What are your thoughts on the priest that disagree with your conclusions?
3. Were any of you in or the ones filming the video debating this subject with Father Pfeiffer that was floating on this site?
I'm the OP and I'm a flat earther, and I never said there was no ISS.
Obviously, I believe there is an ISS because you can watch it live around the clock, and watch the recordings which I posted links to.
What I have said is that NASA did NOT go to the moon, and that there are NO photos that show the earth to be a ball because one cannot attain sufficient altitude to do so. You cannot get there.
The ISS and Space Shuttle are essentially aircraft, high-altitude aircraft, and not space craft. Mechanically speaking, the Shuttle is an airplane, and flies like an airplane. Their altitude is indeed higher than a passenger aircraft, but not really a very great distance from the earth as is evidenced by the footage you can watch.
When the ISS passes over known coastlines and landmarks on a clear day, (or hurricanes, as in yesterday's footage) you can see the scale of what they are capable of seeing. It is quite small: only about 500 miles.
Think of that!! The earth has a claimed diameter of 8,000 miles, and they can only see about 500 miles!
-
3. Were any of you in or the ones filming the video debating this subject with Father Pfeiffer that was floating on this site?
I'm not in the video, but I've seen it.
Fr. Pfeiffer commits a grave error in the discussion of flat earth because he keeps using the terms globe/ball/circle/round interchangably as if they all mean the same thing.
They don't and most 4 year olds can distinguish between a circle (two dimensional) and a ball (three dimensional).
The original Bible from 1610 nowhere refers to the earth as being a globe. The version of the Douay Rheims we use is from 1899. It is the ONLY Bible that uses the word "globe." The earlier 1610 version of the Douay Rheims only uses the word "compass" which means circle. The various Protestant versions of the Bible use the word "circle" and not globe.
-
Alright, thank you Tradplorable, I appreciate the replies. I brought up the ISS because I have heard numerous statements on the forum about how it may be a projection, planets don't exist because people used the zoom feature on their cameras...things like that.
Also, going back to question 2. If you are rooting your beliefs in Catholic doctrine and scripture, what are the names of the traditional priests/bishops are teaching this today? Are they SSPX, former SSPX, SSPV, independent, or an entire order? What are your thoughts on the priest that disagree with your conclusions?
-
Here's a nice piece of footage recorded today only a few hours ago.
If you set the marker to the 2:58:00 mark, you will see a clear, cloudless view of a mountain range. You can see much detail in the mountains and see what a relatively small area they are looking at, and it doesn't look a whole lot different from what you'd see from your windowseat in a passenger airliner.
http://www.
ustream.tv/recorded/107734109
Also, if you go to the 50:36 mark, you can watch the sunrise over the flat plane and see precisely how the throw of the sun's light is small and see it pass overhead of the camera, bringing its path of light with it.
-
Alright, thank you Tradplorable, I appreciate the replies. I brought up the ISS because I have heard numerous statements on the forum about how it may be a projection, planets don't exist because people used the zoom feature on their cameras...things like that.
Also, going back to question 2. If you are rooting your beliefs in Catholic doctrine and scripture, what are the names of the traditional priests/bishops are teaching this today? Are they SSPX, former SSPX, SSPV, independent, or an entire order? What are your thoughts on the priest that disagree with your conclusions?
.
Have you noticed flat-earthers don't have any intelligible answer to your question?
.
That's because there are no priests who agree with them.
.
But priests are meticulously trained in how to deal with sensitive cases, people close to "the edge" who could "go over" upon hearing something they can't handle.
.
So they're inclined to deal with such persons, let's say, with kid gloves.
.
In extreme cases, they might even resort to a psychological technique to effect a feeling of sympathetic compassion.
.
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tsogpss.co.uk.gridhosted.co.uk%2Fgrmpyff.gif&sp=886b2c46971551d9e4708036a36755e1)
-
My question is open to anyone really. I'm not doing it to bicker, fight, or trade insults. By now I've seen the videos, pictures and read most of the explanations. I'm not interested in any of the diatribes. I am just trying to follow the line of logic or how if this is a matter of faith, how the contradiction is resolved personal in the faith versus the faith of the priest.
I was interested if there were any traditional priests, regardless of affiliation of SSPX, SSPV...etc, that support these conclusion from the folks posting in this forum on this subject. If your parish priest or overall an order comes out in against what you believe to be true, are they heretics, pagans, and masons as well. Does this change your view of them in tradition? By that I mean, If a priest does reject all the fact that you present to them (scripture and quotes from the faith), do you view this as a sin? The round earth is being taught in the traditional Catholic schools, are the priest and teachers who don't believe the same as you, guilty for corrupting the minds of the youth?
I ask to understand the next step in your logic beyond the dialogue posted in this forum.
-
By that I mean, If a priest does reject all the fact that you present to them (scripture and quotes from the faith), do you view this as a sin? The round earth is being taught in the traditional Catholic schools, are the priest and teachers who don't believe the same as you, guilty for corrupting the minds of the youth?
I ask to understand the next step in your logic beyond the dialogue posted in this forum.
Personally, I view it as a rejection of grace.
Fr. Pfeiffer has been given a great grace in being presented with so much information by such wonderfully knowledgeable flat earth folks.
So, I see it as similar to not cooperating with God's grace when He is calling someone to conversion.
Yes, it is sad that Trad schools do not teach the Book of Genesis, but teach Copernicanism and globalism. I view that as a kind of reduced culpability on their part due to ignorance (they are brainwashed from birth like all of us were), as I myself never gave much thought to the shape until presented with the facts and a re-read of Genesis.
-
Thank you for your answer Tradp.
-
Personally, I view it as a rejection of grace.
Fr. Pfeiffer has been given a great grace in being presented with so much information by such wonderfully knowledgeable flat earth folks.
So, I see it as similar to not cooperating with God's grace when He is calling someone to conversion.
Yes, it is sad that Trad schools do not teach the Book of Genesis, but teach Copernicanism and globalism. I view that as a kind of reduced culpability on their part due to ignorance (they are brainwashed from birth like all of us were), as I myself never gave much thought to the shape until presented with the facts and a re-read of Genesis.
.
How do you know of any flat-earthers who have approached Fr. Pfeiffer on that topic?
.
Do you know Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer? Did you speak to him about your silly flat-earthism?
.
How "brainwashed" do you need to be to look at a full moon and see it for what it is?
.
-
.
How do you know of any flat-earthers who have approached Fr. Pfeiffer on that topic?
.
Do you know Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer? Did you speak to him about your silly flat-earthism?
.
How "brainwashed" do you need to be to look at a full moon and see it for what it is?
.
God created the flat earth.
-
God created the flat earth.
.
I wasn't asking you. But since you replied, my response is, if God created the earth "FLAT," then what happened to it since then?
.
All you have to do is look at the full moon each month and see the earth is a globe.
.
Because (for example) if it were "flat" the moon would never appear to be FULL over the length of each meridian (north to south) all night long from pole to pole (or if you prefer, from sea to shining sea).
.
And it does so once each month, not in one place or another, but all over the earth at the same time, every time, 24/7.
.
So the earth can't be "flat" otherwise the moon would appear to be in different phases viewed from different parts of the earth every day and every night, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (and 366 in leap year).
.
-
.
How do you know of any flat-earthers who have approached Fr. Pfeiffer on that topic?
.
Do you know Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer? Did you speak to him about your silly flat-earthism?
.
How "brainwashed" do you need to be to look at a full moon and see it for what it is?
.
He says in the video that he was approached. But as usual, you didn't watch it. So how would you know?
Are you not doing enough for the globe earth cause by working for NASA? Why do you need to bother coming onto this forum? We're clearly not worthy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGtB-TapXDc
-
He says in the video that he was approached. But as usual, you didn't watch it. So how would you know?
Are you not doing enough for the globe earth cause by working for NASA? Why do you need to bother coming onto this forum? We're clearly not worthy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGtB-TapXDc
.
I watched that video, and Fr. Pfeiffer is not in it nor is he mentioned. You must have the wrong video, again.
.
And furthermore, my offer is still open, which you either didn't read or didn't understand, that if you supply a transcript of this video you mistakenly posted here, I will give a line-by-line reply to it. But I'm not going to do the transcription. I'd have to charge you, and you couldn't afford it.
.
So if you're not worthy why do you bother posting? Isn't it a waste of your precious time? You could be on flat-earth-tards where you could have the whole site to your self. HAHAHAHA
-
.
I wasn't asking you. But since you replied, my response is, if God created the earth "FLAT," then what happened to it since then?
.
All you have to do is look at the full moon each month and see the earth is a globe.
.
Because (for example) if it were "flat" the moon would never appear to be FULL over the length of each meridian (north to south) all night long from pole to pole (or if you prefer, from sea to shining sea).
.
And it does so once each month, not in one place or another, but all over the earth at the same time, every time, 24/7.
.
So the earth can't be "flat" otherwise the moon would appear to be in different phases viewed from different parts of the earth every day and every night, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (and 366 in leap year).
.
The earth is and has always been flat.
-
The earth is and has always been flat.
.
All you have to do is look at the moon and see the earth is a globe.
.
On second thought, don't bother because you can't see what you're looking at.
.
-
My question is open to anyone really. I'm not doing it to bicker, fight, or trade insults. By now I've seen the videos, pictures and read most of the explanations. I'm not interested in any of the diatribes. I am just trying to follow the line of logic or how if this is a matter of faith, how the contradiction is resolved personal in the faith versus the faith of the priest.
I was interested if there were any traditional priests, regardless of affiliation of SSPX, SSPV...etc, that support these conclusion from the folks posting in this forum on this subject. If your parish priest or overall an order comes out in against what you believe to be true, are they heretics, pagans, and masons as well. Does this change your view of them in tradition? By that I mean, If a priest does reject all the fact that you present to them (scripture and quotes from the faith), do you view this as a sin? The round earth is being taught in the traditional Catholic schools, are the priest and teachers who don't believe the same as you, guilty for corrupting the minds of the youth?
I ask to understand the next step in your logic beyond the dialogue posted in this forum.
1. Please clarify "... resolved personal in the faith versus the faith... "
-
.
All you have to do is look at the moon and see the earth is a globe.
.
On second thought, don't bother because you can't see what you're looking at.
.
The moon is not a mirror of the earth. Nice try Neil; the earth is still flat.
-
Personally, I view it as a rejection of grace.
Fr. Pfeiffer has been given a great grace in being presented with so much information by such wonderfully knowledgeable flat earth folks.
So, I see it as similar to not cooperating with God's grace when He is calling someone to conversion.
Yes, it is sad that Trad schools do not teach the Book of Genesis, but teach Copernicanism and globalism. I view that as a kind of reduced culpability on their part due to ignorance (they are brainwashed from birth like all of us were), as I myself never gave much thought to the shape until presented with the facts and a re-read of Genesis.
The thickness of pride and arrogance. You can't name one traditional priest or bishop who insists the earth is flat. But you know better than all of them, and recognize that they're rejecting grace, based largely on your protestant private interpretation.
-
The thickness of pride and arrogance. You can't name one traditional priest or bishop who insists the earth is flat. But you know better than all of them, and recognize that they're rejecting grace, based largely on your protestant private interpretation.
If a Priest, who has continually been shown the Flat Earth Horizon by someone who knows the earth is flat, still persists in the rejection of THE FLAT EARTH HORIZON HE CLEARLY SEES, HE IS CLEARLY REJECTING GOD'S GRACE ON THIS ISSUE.
ACCEPTING THE GRACE GOD HAS GIVEN ME TO SEE THE EARTH IS FLAT, IS NOT PRIDE AND ARROGANCE, BUT, WISDOM.
-
The thickness of pride and arrogance. You can't name one traditional priest or bishop who insists the earth is flat. But you know better than all of them, and recognize that they're rejecting grace, based largely on your protestant private interpretation.
Absent or insufficient motives of credibility = "rejection of grace"
Uh huh...
-
1. Please clarify "... resolved personal in the faith versus the faith... "
DZ P,
I'm sorry, I should have reread my words before posting.
"how if this is a matter of faith, how the contradiction is resolved personal in the faith versus the faith of the priest."
Attempt to clarify:
From all the threads on this forum, this seems to boil down to a matter of faith and Catholic truth. Believing in the modern globe makes you at the very least, someone who has willfully and selectively rejected certain teachings of the Catholic Church.. and at the worst, a pagan, jew, freemason. Do you question the faith and morals of the traditional priests? Do you call them the same names the members of this forum have been called, when they reject flat earth after being presented this information? There seems to be a moral conflict there. If the priest utterly reject flat earth would that make him a bad Catholic heretic believing in a freemasonic globe? Do you still receive sacraments from such a man. I wanted to be able to follow their logic and know how they personally resolved this contradiction.
-
... faith versus the faith...
No need for sorry sir. See any problems with the above?
-
All you have to do is look at the full moon each month and see the earth is a globe.
God, Neil, your total rejection of 1 Cor. is tiresome.
DO you think God was wrong? God explained it all to you in the Bible, but you think you know better than Him about the Creation He made? Really, your arrogance is astounding.
-
.
Because (for example) if it were "flat" the moon would never appear to be FULL over the length of each meridian (north to south) all night long from pole to pole (or if you prefer, from sea to shining sea).
.
And it does so once each month, not in one place or another, but all over the earth at the same time, every time, 24/7.
.
So the earth can't be "flat" otherwise the moon would appear to be in different phases viewed from different parts of the earth every day and every night, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (and 366 in leap year).
.
I meant to add, also, that you fundamentally do not understand the flat earth model and how the sun and moon work in their circuit above the plane of earth, nor do you understand perspective.
I find this odd, especially since you work at NASA, because that would possibly indicate that you are smart, and the FE model is very simple to understand. However, maybe your job at NASA is janitor?
-
.
How do you know of any flat-earthers who have approached Fr. Pfeiffer on that topic?
Because I watched the video! And you posted it yourself, so I assume YOU watched it. He was approached about the topic and he decided to make a presentation on why he thought it was wrong and that the earth is a ball.
-
Back to the subject of my original post in this thread:
how the ISS proves the earth is NOT a ball, but is a flat plane.
Here is some more footage from yesterday morning:
http://
www.ustream.tv/recorded/107741615
(Cut & paste and remove the spaces to watch)
The camera is facing due east.
In this footage you will see the setting of the sun in the west, taking its light with it. Then, three minutes later, you will see the moon rise and ascend upward as it passes overhead, showing the altitude of the moon to be higher than the ISS.
Set the time marker at 19:00 to see the set of the sun.
At 22:20 you will see the rise of the moon in the upper right corner.
At 1:01:15 you will see the rise of the sun.
-
Hurricane Irma is over 500 miles wide. Flat as the land it traverses. Like the form it follows.
-
God, Neil,...
Fruit three...
-
Why doesn't the link to the ISS feed show up?
ustream.tv/recorded/107741615
ETA: just put www in front of it.
-
What is with you and blaspheming. I'm inclined to reject the message because of the messenger.
You have rejected the message from ALL the messengers here. I'm late to the party, and my lack of refinement is NOT the reason you reject the message you have previously been given. Grow up.
-
You have rejected the message from ALL the messengers here. I'm late to the party, and my lack of refinement is NOT the reason you reject the message you have previously been given. Grow up.
"My lack of refinement is not the reason you're executing me."
Ted Bundy
-
Once one is grown up are they allowed to take the Lord's name in vain?
Once one is a grown up, are they allowed to pick and choose which parts of the Bible do not conform to their long-held globe-earth belief?
-
Once one is a grown up, are they allowed to pick and choose which parts of the Bible do not conform to their long-held globe-earth belief?
The Gospel according to Benny Hinn's "love" children.
-
Back on topic:
Here's a beautiful sunrise:
ustream.tv/recorded/107737597
Put 3 w's in front,
then go to the 59:00 mark, sun breaks at 59:39.
-
.
Are you schizophrenic? Maybe you should see a doctor and get treatment.
.
post (https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/proof-earth-is-not-a-ball-from-the-iss/msg564955/#msg564955)
Here's a beautiful sunrise:
ustream.tv/recorded/107737597
Put 3 w's in front, then go to the 59:00 mark, sun breaks at 59:39.
.
Sun actually breaks at 56:40, then again at 2:29:00
.
And this proves to you the earth is flat?
.
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F6e%2F46%2Fdd%2F6e46dd083dce48abd7318d8bfa990807--cartoon-jokes-funny-cartoons.jpg&sp=4db13f144b3754479da04868017f5a9b)
-
Sun actually breaks at 56:40, then again at 2:29:00
.
And this proves to you the earth is flat?
Sorry, that was a typo, my bad. I hit 9's where I meant to type 6's.
You can begin to see the thin blue line at 56:00, and the sun breaks at 56:39.
But, yes, it is magnificent proof of flat earth if you took any time to understand the model and perspective.
-
Sorry, that was a typo, my bad. I hit 9's where I meant to type 6's.
You can begin to see the thin blue line at 56:00, and the sun breaks at 56:39.
But, yes, it is magnificent proof of flat earth if you took any time to understand the model and perspective.
.
A real time movie of a sunrise over the curvature of the earth proves what, again?
.
Are you schizophrenic? You should see a doctor and perhaps you can get treatment.
.
But then again, maybe not. You might be incurable.
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.jrn.com%2Fimages%2Fb99698905z.1_20160406183434_000_gt4f5ko3.1-1.jpg&sp=e5a6ead92bf8a9b97875242d37bebdac)
.
Your alter-ego's fave video:
.
www. ustream.tv/recorded/107737597
.
(Remove the space after "www.")
.
-
.
A real time movie of a sunrise over the curvature of the earth proves what, again?
.
Are you schizophrenic? You should see a doctor and perhaps you can get treatment.
.
But then again, maybe not. You might be incurable.
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.jrn.com%2Fimages%2Fb99698905z.1_20160406183434_000_gt4f5ko3.1-1.jpg&sp=e5a6ead92bf8a9b97875242d37bebdac)
.
Your alter-ego's fave video:
.
www. ustream.tv/recorded/107737597
.
(Remove the space after "www.")
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S1bUcWOVsA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S1bUcWOVsA)
-
.
Are you schizophrenic? Maybe you should see a doctor and get treatment.
.
post (https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/proof-earth-is-not-a-ball-from-the-iss/msg564955/#msg564955).
Sun actually breaks at 56:40, then again at 2:29:00
.
And this proves to you the earth is flat?
.
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F6e%2F46%2Fdd%2F6e46dd083dce48abd7318d8bfa990807--cartoon-jokes-funny-cartoons.jpg&sp=4db13f144b3754479da04868017f5a9b)
Neil, since you have a bit of an obsession with Gary Larson cartoons, I thought you might like to know that he also authored some witty quotes. Which makes sense. And since you direct Larson's art toward flat-earthers, I'll dedicate this Larson quote to you:
"You know those little snow globes you shake up? I always thought my brain was sort of like that. You know, you just give it a shake and watch what comes out and shake it again. It's like that."
More Gary Larson quotes:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0488989/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm
Btw, Gary Larson is a Washington State native, which may account for his warped but funny sense of humor. He actually lived in the same part of town that I do, for a long time, though I never met him. I've been told that he moved out of the city. Smart guy.
-
Neil, since you have a bit of an obsession with Gary Larson cartoons, I thought you might like to know that he also authored some witty quotes. Which makes sense. And since you direct Larson's art toward flat-earthers, I'll dedicate this Larson quote to you:
"You know those little snow globes you shake up? I always thought my brain was sort of like that. You know, you just give it a shake and watch what comes out and shake it again. It's like that."
More Gary Larson quotes:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0488989/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm
Btw, Gary Larson is a Washington State native, which may account for his warped but funny sense of humor. He actually lived in the same part of town that I do, for a long time, though I never met him. I've been told that he moved out of the city. Smart guy.
.
I have yet to meet him but I know a crowd of fans who would love to.
.
There are 3 topics he does not take up: Immorality (avoiding the world of sex jokes), Politics, and Taking Pleasure in the Pain of Others.
.
The rest is pretty much up for grabs.
.
They say he got started really young, around age 7 ..........................
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F236x%2Fa1%2Fbf%2F2a%2Fa1bf2a98e2ddebf969ea73e004324b95--gary-larson-the-far-side.jpg&sp=e0fdcb32df80e7591bed845d6d5edd80)
.
But he wasn't always so good at spelling ("age sevun").
.
For artists or would-be cartoonists - notice the simple linework but precision where it matters, like the net's grid pattern is interrupted where the HEAD of the other player's standing in front of it, and the pole precisely interrupts the right leg and arm of another player on the opposite side, but the elbow of the figure holding the severed head intersects the left arm of the same player. Follow the line of the horizon (good exercise for flat-earthers!!) and see that where essential, the line stops just before running into some figures but doesn't stop for others so as to lend a hint of childlike immaturity to the scene. He was a very good imitator of what viewers would expect for a child, even at "age sevun."
.
By the way, the ball shape in the foreground is not "the ball," it's a globe. See the longitude lines drawn on it? A very subtle globe earth cartoon!!
.
-
.
I have yet to meet him but I know a crowd of fans who would love to.
.
There are 3 topics he does not take up: Immorality (avoiding the world of sex jokes), Politics, and Taking Pleasure in the Pain of Others.
.
The rest is pretty much up for grabs.
.
They say he got started really young, around age 7 ..........................
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F236x%2Fa1%2Fbf%2F2a%2Fa1bf2a98e2ddebf969ea73e004324b95--gary-larson-the-far-side.jpg&sp=e0fdcb32df80e7591bed845d6d5edd80)
.
But he wasn't always so good at spelling ("age sevun").
.
For artists or would-be cartoonists - notice the simple linework but precision where it matters, like the net's grid pattern is interrupted where the HEAD of the other player's standing in front of it, and the pole precisely interrupts the right leg and arm of another player on the opposite side, but the elbow of the figure holding the severed head intersects the left arm of the same player. Follow the line of the horizon (good exercise for flat-earthers!!) and see that where essential, the line stops just before running into some figures but doesn't stop for others so as to lend a hint of childlike immaturity to the scene. He was a very good imitator of what viewers would expect for a child, even at "age sevun."
.
By the way, the ball shape in the foreground is not "the ball," it's a globe. See the longitude lines drawn on it? A very subtle globe earth cartoon!!
.
A circle is not a sphere.
-
.
I have yet to meet him but I know a crowd of fans who would love to.
.
There are 3 topics he does not take up: Immorality (avoiding the world of sex jokes), Politics, and Taking Pleasure in the Pain of Others.
.
The rest is pretty much up for grabs.
.
They say he got started really young, around age 7 ..........................
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F236x%2Fa1%2Fbf%2F2a%2Fa1bf2a98e2ddebf969ea73e004324b95--gary-larson-the-far-side.jpg&sp=e0fdcb32df80e7591bed845d6d5edd80)
.
But he wasn't always so good at spelling ("age sevun").
.
For artists or would-be cartoonists - notice the simple linework but precision where it matters, like the net's grid pattern is interrupted where the HEAD of the other player's standing in front of it, and the pole precisely interrupts the right leg and arm of another player on the opposite side, but the elbow of the figure holding the severed head intersects the left arm of the same player. Follow the line of the horizon (good exercise for flat-earthers!!) and see that where essential, the line stops just before running into some figures but doesn't stop for others so as to lend a hint of childlike immaturity to the scene. He was a very good imitator of what viewers would expect for a child, even at "age sevun."
.
By the way, the ball shape in the foreground is not "the ball," it's a globe. See the longitude lines drawn on it? A very subtle globe earth cartoon!!
.
Yes, it's good that Larson has avoided any immoral cartoons. That's a rare thing. He loves animals but thinks that cows in particular are a very strange breed of creature. But you probably know that. Yes, he was a very good imitator of what viewers would expect of a child. And yet his drawings are clear and make sense. (unlike the globe-earthers). I think that his parents must have encouraged him to draw when he was a youngster.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S1bUcWOVsA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S1bUcWOVsA)
.
I've already provided commentary on this video but it was before your time, Truth is Transitory.
.
The video does not provide any relevant data, and that's consistent with a tacit intention to hide the truth. You see, all they'd have to say is it was recorded in the plains of Norway or the rolling hills of northern Canada. But if they did that, we would know that the camera was north of the arctic circle, where for at least one day the sun does not set on the Summer Solstice. The further north you go, the more days you get of 24-hour sunshine. Since the sun gets close to the horizon here in this video but not too close, the latitude was likely about 5 degrees north of the arctic circle.
.
BTW that is how it works on a globe earth, which BTW is the real earth. The flat-earth is mere fantasy.
.
Also notice the fact that the picture you see before the video begins is not an image from the video content. The moving picture found within is taken on dry land with no water surface to be seen anywhere. More deception!
.
They have disabled comments on the video, and therefore after 9 months, it only has a measly 389 views. If comments had been enabled there would have been a lot more views since word of mouth would encourage others to come and see then post their words, which would have been mostly words like, "Did you have a nice time north of the arctic circle when you went there just to fake a video?" After a few days of such replies, if the author doesn't delete them, everyone viewing would realize the deception that had been intended. If he did delete them there would be even more comments complaining that comments were deleted. In fact, some videos like this look just like this one does after the author got tired of deleting whistle-blower comments and then disabled comments altogether.
.
Since the comments are disabled, the exposure of the fraud is left to forums like this one, and the author has no control over those.
.
Published on Dec 5, 2016
Proof The Sun Never Sets! The Earth is Flat like a bowl of water. The sun travels too far to see, but never curves around the globe.
.
-
.
I have yet to meet him but I know a crowd of fans who would love to.
.
There are 3 topics he does not take up: Immorality (avoiding the world of sex jokes), Politics, and Taking Pleasure in the Pain of Others.
.
The rest is pretty much up for grabs.
.
They say he got started really young, around age 7 ..........................
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F236x%2Fa1%2Fbf%2F2a%2Fa1bf2a98e2ddebf969ea73e004324b95--gary-larson-the-far-side.jpg&sp=e0fdcb32df80e7591bed845d6d5edd80)
.
But he wasn't always so good at spelling ("age sevun").
.
For artists or would-be cartoonists - notice the simple linework but precision where it matters, like the net's grid pattern is interrupted where the HEAD of the other player's standing in front of it, and the pole precisely interrupts the right leg and arm of another player on the opposite side, but the elbow of the figure holding the severed head intersects the left arm of the same player. Follow the line of the horizon (good exercise for flat-earthers!!) and see that where essential, the line stops just before running into some figures but doesn't stop for others so as to lend a hint of childlike immaturity to the scene. He was a very good imitator of what viewers would expect for a child, even at "age sevun."
.
By the way, the ball shape in the foreground is not "the ball," it's a globe. See the longitude lines drawn on it? A very subtle globe earth cartoon!!
.
Gotta love Gary Larson, even if it's in spite of his nutty ball notions.
-
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fs-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com%2Foriginals%2F15%2F7e%2F2f%2F157e2fb09e85d7adaa490276638c0ef6.jpg&sp=01466b4e154f87cb0d9a17cf074a7e4b)
.
-
:)
-
.
Same guy with the intercom button?
.
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2Fba%2Fdb%2Ff7%2Fbadbf7db8383cffd96a9f4b19a53740d--pilot-humor-aviation-humor.jpg&sp=ce8a8c2399530a943cc719fe011cee54)
-
Good will and a cease fire? That would be nice.
-
I was always partial to Bloom County.
.
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/ab/6f/1d/ab6f1dd732d784d53de77b93bbe4b888--berkeley-cartoon-characters.jpg)
-
A circle is not a sphere.
Thank you for this breath of sanity and common sense.
-
A circle is not a sphere.
It is in rotation, relative or otherwise.
No? Spin a coin on a table.
-
It is in rotation, relative or otherwise.
No? Spin a coin on a table.
A spinning coin is a circle and is not a sphere.
-
A spinning coin is a circle and is not a sphere.
I still maintain some hope for the future, in that some still have children that live.
-
It is in rotation, relative or otherwise.
No? Spin a coin on a table.
Point.
No height, width or depth. (H, W, D=3D)
Point = point
Point under simplest Thomistic change/"motion", namely single vector time/space (4D) =
Line
Length, no width, nor depth. Under second vector (5D) =
Plane...
Wiggle a pencil to get an idea of "line".
None of the above are "real", but that doesn't mean that they do not exist.
No abstraction exists of itself. No one can show anyone "blue" or a numeric quantity for example.
Geometric solids likewise do not exist sans certain abstract qualities such as lines.
A coin pre-spun is not a "circle", but is "circular".
It can't be a circle, geometrically speaking, because it has at least one quality that precludes it being so, namely thickness.
No? Please inform we globey yokels, is the earth flat or is it a plane?
Eternal things? Curious.
-
.
(https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/477240891738340411/)(https://i.pinimg.com/564x/4b/95/11/4b9511365b17335fa3223544a51712a8.jpg)
.
.
-
A spinning coin is a circle and is not a sphere.
.
A spinning coin is a sphere and not a circle.
.
(https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fc1.staticflickr.com%2F3%2F2814%2F9075357907_6aa6eba493_b.jpg&sp=c783dd079c60f2be48f63a8fc4a26768)
.
-
.
I have yet to meet him but I know a crowd of fans who would love to.
.
There are 3 topics he does not take up: Immorality (avoiding the world of sex jokes), Politics, and Taking Pleasure in the Pain of Others.
.
The rest is pretty much up for grabs.
.
They say he got started really young, around age 7 ..........................
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F236x%2Fa1%2Fbf%2F2a%2Fa1bf2a98e2ddebf969ea73e004324b95--gary-larson-the-far-side.jpg&sp=e0fdcb32df80e7591bed845d6d5edd80)
.
But he wasn't always so good at spelling ("age sevun").
.
For artists or would-be cartoonists - notice the simple linework but precision where it matters, like the net's grid pattern is interrupted where the HEAD of the other player's standing in front of it, and the pole precisely interrupts the right leg and arm of another player on the opposite side, but the elbow of the figure holding the severed head intersects the left arm of the same player. Follow the line of the horizon (good exercise for flat-earthers!!) and see that where essential, the line stops just before running into some figures but doesn't stop for others so as to lend a hint of childlike immaturity to the scene. He was a very good imitator of what viewers would expect for a child, even at "age sevun."
.
By the way, the ball shape in the foreground is not "the ball," it's a globe. See the longitude lines drawn on it? A very subtle globe earth cartoon!!
.
.
I had expected that someone would challenge my suggestion that the ball in the foreground is rather a globe.
.
The point is, the figure drawn there does not look like any volleyball design. They make volleyballs to appear obviously different from basketballs to make it harder to grab the wrong ball for a game. Volleyballs have a different texture, different color, different size and different seam pattern.
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcliparts.co%2Fcliparts%2FpTo%2FAEr%2FpToAErayc.gif&sp=f5ffebd7f6df7cd5bf45f5b94e8230ef)
.
They usually have the same general pattern in the seams, but newer versions sometimes have different colors:
.
(https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.active.com%2FAssets%2Factive-family%2FDrills%2Fvolleyball-fundamentals-620.jpg&sp=be3a28d8b0eeb94bf9b529877d66de66)
.
When the ball's in motion you see the opposing directions of the panels, this one has two regions separated by a squiggle center band:
.
(https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.cdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F160807004251-beach-volleyball-super-169.jpg&sp=953c268def5c793b14a5e92fee34c16e)
.
Another concept ball:
.
(https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages-na.ssl-images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F91gsGMVcDnL._SX355_.jpg&sp=0036762ff4e9edc0d262caddda66a74a)
.
But none of them look like a basketball.
.
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi5.walmartimages.com%2Fasr%2Fb2e2bd26-ee78-4969-ba70-7657c976b07a_1.335ecae85f27839d251407061d2d4574.jpeg%3FodnHeight%3D450%26amp%3BodnWidth%3D450%26amp%3BodnBg%3DFFFFFF&sp=1ce1739de3af2f24d4edcd64bc1284d9)
.
And Larson's ball doesn't look like a basketball, either:
.
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcityofgoodlettsville.org%2FImageRepository%2FDocuмent%3FdocuмentID%3D1628&sp=810203286999b8e5bc4874821455d26b)
.
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdemandware.edgesuite.net%2Fabah_prd%2Fon%2Fdemandware.static%2F-%2FSites-spalding_us-Library%2Fdefault%2Fdwb4dd9a6b%2Fimages%2FbasketballPicker%2Foutdoor.jpg&sp=34320a5da73ee6305a3623965e3964d7)(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdemandware.edgesuite.net%2Fabah_prd%2Fon%2Fdemandware.static%2F-%2FSites-spalding_us-Library%2Fdefault%2Fdwb4dd9a6b%2Fimages%2FbasketballPicker%2Foutdoor.jpg&sp=34320a5da73ee6305a3623965e3964d7)