Natural science is inferential. No one piece of info is going to prove something. Proofs are for ideal subjects like mathematics.

Since earthquakes were brought up,  after an earthquake, the stars are in a slightly different position.
I would like to see the evidence for this.  What size earthquake.  What proof.  Scientists have told us for years that we went to the moon, but it turns out they lied. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proofs.
This suggests that earthquake is slightly affecting the earth's rotation. And this cause is local and reasonable according to our personal experiences with angular momentum.

It is impossible for earth to have rotation since Scripture predates and trumps anything science says.  Scripture insists earth is fixed.  And the Church officially condemned the proposition that the earth moves from its foundation.

How does a geocentrist view this? Do they say the earthquake causes the locations of the stars to change slightly? An earthquake on earth affects the distant stars in the universe? That just seems like causally backwards.

It seems even more curious to me when we're not talking about the stars, but about man-made spacecraft in the solar system. Consider the Pioneer anomaly. The Pioneer spacecraft was decelerating slightly differently than expected. (The best explanation is a small force from heat radiating from the spacecraft.) But the effect was very small, so careful measurements had to account for earthquakes, tide variations, and other earth-based events in determining the location of Pioneer. And there was a several hour delay in communications with Pioneer. So does a geocentrist say that Pioneer spacecraft changed in ways that predicted, by the delay time, events on earth? Isn't it more natural to say the these events affected earth's rotation, and so the earth-based observation of Pioneer?

My answer is the same.  Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof.  NASA tried to claim they sent a car into space.  That has been proven to be a giant hoax and Elon Musk a fraud. Why should we believe them when they tell us things about "The Pioneer" spacecraft?

As one scientist interviewed in The Principle stated, it would be ridiculously easy to send a Michelson-Morley apparatus to the moon.  Why haven't they done it?

>Answering this person is a waste of typing. 
>He does not accept the Bible says earth does NOT move.

Apparently.  But you always hope.

What? I don't understand what you mean here.

What? I don't understand what you mean here.
Good luck. But don't hold your breath.
I guess not.