CathInfo.com

Of course, it does not prove that the earth is a globe.  That is obvious.  It does, however, make it highly implausible that Church condemnations of Copernicism should be understood to include the proposition that the earth is a globe.  (As a general rule, Church condemnations should be understood to apply only to that which is explicitly stated.)

(As a general rule, Church condemnations should be understood to apply only to that which is explicitly stated.)

This is a stretch. Some Catholics believe abortion is wrong, except in the case where there's danger to the life of the mother, and they believe it is justified. The Ten Commandments don't explicitly say anything about abortion, just murder, yet the Church rightly teaches not just qualified abortion in most cases, but all abortion is wrong.  It's all there in context even before you search docuмents to find specifics.

To suggest that the condemnations of Galileo were only about the movement of the earth while the Galileo summary written at the time shows that Church authorities condemned the Pythagorean/Copernican/heliocentric model entirely, and the movement specifically, we can all see, they weren't trying to retain some of it by only specifying movement.  One would absolutely need to prove they did not include the globe since the globe is necessary to the pagan doctrine so soundly condemned by description in the summary as well as contrary to the beliefs of the Fathers and Scripture.  Just because you don't recognize Scripture describes a flat earth doesn't mean the Fathers didn't think so.  In fact, it's been proven here on CI many times over.