I agree that God spoke for real, that it's not a metaphor, but the difference is in understanding the formal aspect of speaking from the material ... as per my post above.
Right, and that was St Augustine's point. God did speak, but not in the same way as us and He used language we couldn't comprehend.
Jaynek is twisting St Augustine's words (and her lack of understanding what 'ineffable' means) to say that this part of Genesis is a metaphor.
Then she misuses the phrase "silent on the matter" to brush away parts of Scripture she doesn't like, ignoring the many, many indirect implications.
Very, very dishonest or very, very dumb.