CathInfo.com

Fraud is obvious to anyone who knows anything about IT.

So they somehow "beamed" high definition photo data from one MILLION miles away, as the earth is "rotating" and this telescope is "revolving" at breakneck speeds.  Where's the receiver?  In order to have such high bandwidth, you need a narrow band and higher gigahertz beam.  It's well known that the higher gigahertz you have, the worse the range is.  In your home WiF, the newer ones allow you to choose between 2.4 and 5 gigahertz.  You get much better data throughput at 5, but the 5 has a much shorter range, where you almost have to be sitting in the same room to get the signal.

We see that now with the 5G.  Yes, you can get much greater bandwidth with 5G, but the tradeoff is that you have to put 5G antennas every hundred yards.  You can't just put up a cell tower and go for a mile or two as you could with 4G.

You could send a wider beam of course, like a radio signal, but the high definition throughput is not possible with a wider signal.  With a wider beam signal, you'd be lucky to get the old 2400 baud speeds of the old dialup modems.

If we had this technology, you could set up one very large cell tower and have it be sufficient to cover the entire US.  But the power required for such a thing would be tremendous ... and I'm sure they have that kind of power supply on a satellite with a few solar panels on it.

This thing is a joke from beginning to end, but the general population thinks that NASA has some "magic" technology not available to the rest of the world, something that the private sector would LOVE to take advantage of -- and would certainly have developed long ago if it were possible.  I worked at NASA, and I can assure you that their technology is always at least 10 years out of date.  That's because their projects go on for a decade at least, and if the tech has improved by the end of the project, it's way too late to change it out.

This is to say nothing of all the interference that you'd get from cosmic rays and cosmic radiation against the signal.  This is utterly laughable.

Here's what NASA says on their website about it:

How will Webb communicate with scientists at Earth?

The Webb will send science and engineering data to Earth using a high frequency radio transmitter. Large radio antennas that are part of the NASA Deep Space Network will receive the signals and forward them to the Webb Science and Operation Center at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

"radio" transmitter and an antenna in Baltimore that will "forward" the signals to NASA.  LOL.  I'll bet any money that these are "forwarded" using broadband ethernet ... and we know darn well that the pictures are originating from on earth.  That signal would never have a chance to get through the Van Allen Belt.