Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Nasa Expose The James Webb Space Telescope  (Read 3105 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Nasa Expose The James Webb Space Telescope
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2022, 04:33:10 AM »
I'm not saying the telescope is real, but radio signals can be transmitted at high power through a highly focused emitter, and received by similar high gain radio telescopes. What's harder to believe is them still receiving signals from voyager who's signal is like a billionth of a billionth of a watt (or whatever they say it is) by the time it reaches earth. I guess in theory they could have sent a command to reprogram voyager to send a signal very slowly, so they can better amplify the signal similar to long exposure night sky imaging.

Sure, you can send a "radio" signal, but you absolutely cannot send a concentrated signal capable of decent bandwidth that would permit the transmission of a high definition photos over those distances.  I defy anyone to send a MB of data across a radio signal.

If you could transmit high bandwidth across radio signals, they would have done it already on earth, allowing internet access around the world through radio signals.

Closest they have come is a microwave beam across the Mediterranean, but type of beam that would allow high bandwidth would be a very narrow and targeted beam that has to be line of sight and precisely aimed.  You'd have to hit the target spot on, and the amount of power required to generate such a beam is extremely high.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/02/08/965626/0/en/Exalt-Sets-New-World-Record-for-Microwave-Link-Distance.html

This explains how microwave broadband needs to be line of sight ...
https://waveinternet.co.uk/line-of-sight-broadband/

Yet Exalt Wireless was able to send a signal across the Mediterranean over 235 kilometer, which is simply not possible if the earth were a globe.  This is actually an extremely compelling argument for Flat Earth, by the way.

But to send a narrow band beam like a microwave, it would have to be targeted and precisely aimed, and the though of a satellite beaming such a signal a million miles and then hitting precisely a receiver somewhere on the earth, when the earth is rotating at up to 1000MPH and Webb is allegedly moving at 720MPH ... it's laughable.  At best you might be able to hit the earth somehow, but to have a scattered signal that could be picked up anywhere on earth and yet be concentrated enough to transmit high-definition images ... that's absolutely impossible.

Oh, and another compelling argument for flat earth is the Knickebein system invented and used by the nαzιs during WW2 --




Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Nasa Expose The James Webb Space Telescope
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2022, 04:49:14 AM »
Back to Exalt Wireless, transmitting a line-of-sight microwave beam 235 kilometers over the Mediterranean.

https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/earth-curvature

Put in 235 kilometers.  Even if they had their transmission tower at 1,000 feet tall (roughly the height of the World Trade Center) [I believe someone found info that it was 150 feet tall, but we know it wasn't 1,000.], the target would be hidden by 7,600+ feet due to the curvature of the earth.

So how did they transmit a line of sight microwave beam to a target on the other side of the Mediterranean that should have been hidden by 7,600 feet of globe curvature?

Now, let's play the refraction game here, pretending that refraction can bend the microwaves around the curvature.  Well, good luck with that.  You'd have to have the perfect humidity / density to properly direct the signal to the other end, and this signal would fail if you didn't have the precise necessary atmospheric conditions ... making it useless for establishing internet connectivity.


Re: Nasa Expose The James Webb Space Telescope
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2022, 10:02:27 AM »
NASA is the biggest racket in world history. It's even bigger than the h0Ɩ0h0αx-reparations racket. 

Re: Nasa Expose The James Webb Space Telescope
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2022, 02:33:07 PM »
So, is the general vibe here that the James Webb isn't a real telescope, or that it might just be a piece of space junk utterly incapable of doing what NASA claims?

Re: Nasa Expose The James Webb Space Telescope
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2022, 02:46:51 PM »
So, is the general vibe here that the James Webb isn't a real telescope, or that it might just be a piece of space junk utterly incapable of doing what NASA claims?
Considering that it produces a black and white image with a couple of dots I think it can be safely dismissed as something useless at the very least.

https://odysee.com/@Awaken:10/james-webb-exposed-%E2%80%9Ctrust-the:2
https://odysee.com/@WhatIsTruth_WasIstWahrheit_2:f/JAMES-WEBB-PHOTOSHOP-IMAGES:9