Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: NASA's obsession with 666  (Read 631 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cera

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6539
  • Reputation: +2995/-1565
  • Gender: Female
  • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
NASA's obsession with 666
« on: July 12, 2025, 04:43:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged
    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline Miseremini

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4531
    • Reputation: +3597/-284
    • Gender: Female
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #1 on: July 12, 2025, 06:08:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Well the devil is the prince of the world.
    Logged
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]

    Offline OABrownson1876

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 705
    • Reputation: +576/-27
    • Gender: Male
      • The Orestes Brownson Society
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 12:01:40 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • And if you add the cross, "T" to "NASA," you have the letters for Satan. The original acronym for NASA was NACA, National Advisory Committe for Aeronautics.  The director of NASA, Janet Petro, has an M.A. in Business.  Why this qualifies her to lead NASA is beyond me.  
    Logged
    Bryan Shepherd, M.A. Phil.
    PO Box 17248
    2312 S. Preston
    Louisville, Ky. 40217; email:letsgobryan@protonmail.com. substack: bryanshepherd.substack.com
    website: www.orestesbrownson.org. Rumble: rumble.com/user/Orestes76

    Online Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2874
    • Reputation: +1615/-899
    • Gender: Female
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 01:08:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • He is rounding to make them 666.

    I looked up the speed and it ranges from 66627 to 67100. (This is the same calculation for both the earth going around the sun or the sun going around the earth.)

    The tilt changes from 22.0425° and 24.5°.

    And 2160=6×6×60 but you could also calculate it as 10×9×24 or 20×9×12 or 2x2x2x2x3x3x3x5.

    It's just math, so I guess the devil created math. :cowboy:
    Logged
    1 Corinthians: Chapter 13 "4 Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; 5 Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;"

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12237
    • Reputation: +7742/-2354
    • Gender: Male
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 02:35:50 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Gray2023 on Yesterday at 01:08:44 PM
    He is rounding to make them 666.

    I looked up the speed and it ranges from 66627 to 67100. (This is the same calculation for both the earth going around the sun or the sun going around the earth.)

    The tilt changes from 22.0425° and 24.5°.

    And 2160=6×6×60 but you could also calculate it as 10×9×24 or 20×9×12 or 2x2x2x2x3x3x3x5.

    It's just math, so I guess the devil created math. :cowboy:
    You’re a brainwashed clown.  
    Logged

    Online Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2874
    • Reputation: +1615/-899
    • Gender: Female
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 02:52:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Pax Vobis on Yesterday at 02:35:50 PM
    You’re a brainwashed clown. 
    No just a fact checker.  I very much dislike it when people use emotion to get buy in, which this guy did.  

    Why do you feel the need to call me a name?

    Why don't you point out how my post erred?

    True science is about proving and disproving theories.  I pointed out that what this guy said does not prove anything about 666 and NASA.   The guy manipulated the data to make a point.  How can you trust someone, who does that?

    Logged
    1 Corinthians: Chapter 13 "4 Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; 5 Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;"

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4818
    • Reputation: +1577/-361
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    numerology
    « Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 03:31:25 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co

    Online WorldsAway

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 632
    • Reputation: +526/-67
    • Gender: Male
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 05:06:15 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Gray2023 on Yesterday at 02:52:19 PM
    No just a fact checker.  I very much dislike it when people use emotion to get buy in, which this guy did. 

    Why do you feel the need to call me a name?

    Why don't you point out how my post erred?

    True science is about proving and disproving theories.  I pointed out that what this guy said does not prove anything about 666 and NASA.  The guy manipulated the data to make a point.  How can you trust someone, who does that?
    Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough". I haven't looked into the accuracy of what was claimed in the video, but granting it is accurate, the numbers are "close enough" to be noticed as significant.

    You, and I'm sure many others on different platforms, have speedily and readily performed the role of "deboonker", absolutely destroying the paranoid and delusional theories because...there are decimals! Some of these formulas don't add up to 666.0 exactly, and you don't get "666" if you add up the numbers this or that way. The "deboonkers" leave satisfied with themselves, another crackpot theory taken down. Some more fools put in their place. Maybe they'll even leave a snarky remark like, "it's just math, I guess the devil created math then..tee hee!"
    The more weak willed of the "debunked" theorists end up humiliated and defeated, thinking themselves fools. The stronger willed may end up holding more animosity towards the "deboonkers" than whoever the theory involved to begin with (in this case, NASA). NASA isn't going around debunking them, people who love to dunk on "conspiracy theorists" will do it for free. 
    Logged
    John 15:19  If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

    Online Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2874
    • Reputation: +1615/-899
    • Gender: Female
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 05:33:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: WorldsAway on Yesterday at 05:06:15 PM
    Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough". I haven't looked into the accuracy of what was claimed in the video, but granting it is accurate, the numbers are "close enough" to be noticed as significant.

    You, and I'm sure many others on different platforms, have speedily and readily performed the role of "deboonker", absolutely destroying the paranoid and delusional theories because...there are decimals! Some of these formulas don't add up to 666.0 exactly, and you don't get "666" if you add up the numbers this or that way. The "deboonkers" leave satisfied with themselves, another crackpot theory taken down. Some more fools put in their place. Maybe they'll even leave a snarky remark like, "it's just math, I guess the devil created math then..tee hee!"
    The more weak willed of the "debunked" theorists end up humiliated and defeated, thinking themselves fools. The stronger willed may end up holding more animosity towards the "deboonkers" than whoever the theory involved to begin with (in this case, NASA). NASA isn't going around debunking them, people who love to dunk on "conspiracy theorists" will do it for free.
    I get your point, but I think the mark of the beast scenario is completely overdone.  The premise is "look these things are 666, so NASA must be fake."  It is not logical.

    First, you should watch the video before making any more comments.

    Second, the math comment was just humor, not some emotional tirade.

    Third, do you agree that it was right for Pax to make a personal attack?
    Logged
    1 Corinthians: Chapter 13 "4 Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; 5 Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;"

    Online WorldsAway

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 632
    • Reputation: +526/-67
    • Gender: Male
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 06:21:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Gray2023 on Yesterday at 05:33:58 PM
    I get your point, but I think the mark of the beast scenario is completely overdone.  The premise is "look these things are 666, so NASA must be fake."  It is not logical.

    No, the premise is "look at what NASA is shoving in your face. What they do and have done involves occultism/satanism, and they don't mind that coming to light because they know nothing will happen to them". Where in the video did it say "NASA is fake"? 

    First, you should watch the video before making any more comments.

    "First", improve your reading comprehension. 

    Second, the math comment was just humor, not some emotional tirade.

    "Second", strawman. Of course it was an attempt at "humor"..just a snarky, condescending humor. You enjoyed your "dunk", it's there for everyone to see. This is a very, very common occurrence among "deboonkers". You've played the part well

    Third, do you agree that it was right for Pax to make a personal attack?

    If you can't take the heat...
    Logged
    John 15:19  If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

    Online Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2874
    • Reputation: +1615/-899
    • Gender: Female
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 09:31:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    • Quote
    No, the premise is "look at what NASA is shoving in your face. What they do and have done involves occultism/satanism, and they don't mind that coming to light because they know nothing will happen to them". Where in the video did it say "NASA is fake"? 
         -WorldsAway
    The math involved is not demonic or angelic.  He was making number statements and rounding them to the closest 666 number just to make it seem that it was all about the occult.  Numbers have meaning if they are true and natural, but manipulating them to make a point is just click bait.
    Logged
    1 Corinthians: Chapter 13 "4 Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; 5 Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;"

    Online Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2874
    • Reputation: +1615/-899
    • Gender: Female
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #11 on: Yesterday at 09:39:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0



    • Quote
    Second, the math comment was just humor, not some emotional tirade.

    "Second", strawman. Of course it was an attempt at "humor"..just a snarky, condescending humor. You enjoyed your "dunk", it's there for everyone to see. This is a very, very common occurrence among "deboonkers". You've played the part well



    Making a comment on my own opinion is a strawman?  How?  

    And I don't understand why you have such an emotional response to a post that was obviously humor.  If I said their was no snark intended, and you say there was, who is right?  Me the one who made the comment or you who already has a bias about who you think I am, and what you think I do.

    Logged
    1 Corinthians: Chapter 13 "4 Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; 5 Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;"

    Online Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2874
    • Reputation: +1615/-899
    • Gender: Female
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #12 on: Yesterday at 09:44:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    • Quote
    Third, do you agree that it was right for Pax to make a personal attack?

    If you can't take the heat...
    I can take the heat.  I have been taking the heat for two years now on CathInfo.


    I just find it silly that when someone can't respond directly to a person's opinion the next option is to just make a personal comment.  The only reason to say negative things about someone is so others will think negatively about that person.  I guess some people just feel better about themself, when they put other people down.
    Logged
    1 Corinthians: Chapter 13 "4 Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; 5 Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;"

    Offline St Giles

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1487
    • Reputation: +767/-182
    • Gender: Male
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #13 on: Yesterday at 10:23:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Gray2023 on Yesterday at 09:44:26 PM
    I can take the heat.  I have been taking the heat for two years now on CathInfo.


    I just find it silly that when someone can't respond directly to a person's opinion the next option is to just make a personal comment.  The only reason to say negative things about someone is so others will think negatively about that person.  I guess some people just feel better about themself, when they put other people down.
    Maybe you need to start a badge of honor list for yourself like Johannes did: Stands accused of being a "brainwashed clown" and a "deboonker", and see how many you can collect. Jesus was called worse, and didn't respond.
    Logged
    "Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
    "Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
    "Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"

    Offline caxap

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 20
    • Reputation: +8/-3
    • Gender: Male
    Re: NASA's obsession with 666
    « Reply #14 on: Today at 05:01:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • NASA is one of the biggest rackets in world history. 
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2
    « previous next »