Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Fighting Errors in the Modern World => The Earth God Made - Flat Earth, Geocentrism => Topic started by: Cera on July 12, 2025, 04:43:58 PM
-
https://x.com/i/status/1944090959693680685
-
Well the devil is the prince of the world.
-
And if you add the cross, "T" to "NASA," you have the letters for Satan. The original acronym for NASA was NACA, National Advisory Committe for Aeronautics. The director of NASA, Janet Petro, has an M.A. in Business. Why this qualifies her to lead NASA is beyond me.
-
He is rounding to make them 666.
I looked up the speed and it ranges from 66627 to 67100. (This is the same calculation for both the earth going around the sun or the sun going around the earth.)
The tilt changes from 22.0425° and 24.5°.
And 2160=6×6×60 but you could also calculate it as 10×9×24 or 20×9×12 or 2x2x2x2x3x3x3x5.
It's just math, so I guess the devil created math. :cowboy:
-
He is rounding to make them 666.
I looked up the speed and it ranges from 66627 to 67100. (This is the same calculation for both the earth going around the sun or the sun going around the earth.)
The tilt changes from 22.0425° and 24.5°.
And 2160=6×6×60 but you could also calculate it as 10×9×24 or 20×9×12 or 2x2x2x2x3x3x3x5.
It's just math, so I guess the devil created math. :cowboy:
You’re a brainwashed clown.
-
You’re a brainwashed clown.
No just a fact checker. I very much dislike it when people use emotion to get buy in, which this guy did.
Why do you feel the need to call me a name?
Why don't you point out how my post erred?
True science is about proving and disproving theories. I pointed out that what this guy said does not prove anything about 666 and NASA. The guy manipulated the data to make a point. How can you trust someone, who does that?
-
https://x.com/i/status/1944090959693680685
A lot of numerology there.
-
No just a fact checker. I very much dislike it when people use emotion to get buy in, which this guy did.
Why do you feel the need to call me a name?
Why don't you point out how my post erred?
True science is about proving and disproving theories. I pointed out that what this guy said does not prove anything about 666 and NASA. The guy manipulated the data to make a point. How can you trust someone, who does that?
Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough". I haven't looked into the accuracy of what was claimed in the video, but granting it is accurate, the numbers are "close enough" to be noticed as significant.
You, and I'm sure many others on different platforms, have speedily and readily performed the role of "deboonker", absolutely destroying the paranoid and delusional theories because...there are decimals! Some of these formulas don't add up to 666.0 exactly, and you don't get "666" if you add up the numbers this or that way. The "deboonkers" leave satisfied with themselves, another crackpot theory taken down. Some more fools put in their place. Maybe they'll even leave a snarky remark like, "it's just math, I guess the devil created math then..tee hee!"
The more weak willed of the "debunked" theorists end up humiliated and defeated, thinking themselves fools. The stronger willed may end up holding more animosity towards the "deboonkers" than whoever the theory involved to begin with (in this case, NASA). NASA isn't going around debunking them, people who love to dunk on "conspiracy theorists" will do it for free.
-
Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough". I haven't looked into the accuracy of what was claimed in the video, but granting it is accurate, the numbers are "close enough" to be noticed as significant.
You, and I'm sure many others on different platforms, have speedily and readily performed the role of "deboonker", absolutely destroying the paranoid and delusional theories because...there are decimals! Some of these formulas don't add up to 666.0 exactly, and you don't get "666" if you add up the numbers this or that way. The "deboonkers" leave satisfied with themselves, another crackpot theory taken down. Some more fools put in their place. Maybe they'll even leave a snarky remark like, "it's just math, I guess the devil created math then..tee hee!"
The more weak willed of the "debunked" theorists end up humiliated and defeated, thinking themselves fools. The stronger willed may end up holding more animosity towards the "deboonkers" than whoever the theory involved to begin with (in this case, NASA). NASA isn't going around debunking them, people who love to dunk on "conspiracy theorists" will do it for free.
I get your point, but I think the mark of the beast scenario is completely overdone. The premise is "look these things are 666, so NASA must be fake." It is not logical.
First, you should watch the video before making any more comments.
Second, the math comment was just humor, not some emotional tirade.
Third, do you agree that it was right for Pax to make a personal attack?
-
I get your point, but I think the mark of the beast scenario is completely overdone. The premise is "look these things are 666, so NASA must be fake." It is not logical.
No, the premise is "look at what NASA is shoving in your face. What they do and have done involves occultism/satanism, and they don't mind that coming to light because they know nothing will happen to them". Where in the video did it say "NASA is fake"?
First, you should watch the video before making any more comments.
"First", improve your reading comprehension.
Second, the math comment was just humor, not some emotional tirade.
"Second", strawman. Of course it was an attempt at "humor"..just a snarky, condescending humor. You enjoyed your "dunk", it's there for everyone to see. This is a very, very common occurrence among "deboonkers". You've played the part well
Third, do you agree that it was right for Pax to make a personal attack?
If you can't take the heat...
-
No, the premise is "look at what NASA is shoving in your face. What they do and have done involves occultism/satanism, and they don't mind that coming to light because they know nothing will happen to them". Where in the video did it say "NASA is fake"?
-WorldsAway
The math involved is not demonic or angelic. He was making number statements and rounding them to the closest 666 number just to make it seem that it was all about the occult. Numbers have meaning if they are true and natural, but manipulating them to make a point is just click bait.
-
Second, the math comment was just humor, not some emotional tirade.
"Second", strawman. Of course it was an attempt at "humor"..just a snarky, condescending humor. You enjoyed your "dunk", it's there for everyone to see. This is a very, very common occurrence among "deboonkers". You've played the part well
Making a comment on my own opinion is a strawman? How?
And I don't understand why you have such an emotional response to a post that was obviously humor. If I said their was no snark intended, and you say there was, who is right? Me the one who made the comment or you who already has a bias about who you think I am, and what you think I do.
-
Third, do you agree that it was right for Pax to make a personal attack?
If you can't take the heat...
I can take the heat. I have been taking the heat for two years now on CathInfo.
I just find it silly that when someone can't respond directly to a person's opinion the next option is to just make a personal comment. The only reason to say negative things about someone is so others will think negatively about that person. I guess some people just feel better about themself, when they put other people down.
-
I can take the heat. I have been taking the heat for two years now on CathInfo.
I just find it silly that when someone can't respond directly to a person's opinion the next option is to just make a personal comment. The only reason to say negative things about someone is so others will think negatively about that person. I guess some people just feel better about themself, when they put other people down.
Maybe you need to start a badge of honor list for yourself like Johannes did: Stands accused of being a "brainwashed clown" and a "deboonker", and see how many you can collect. Jesus was called worse, and didn't respond.
-
NASA is one of the biggest rackets in world history.
-
Maybe you need to start a badge of honor list for yourself like Johannes did: Stands accused of being a "brainwashed clown" and a "deboonker", and see how many you can collect. Jesus was called worse, and didn't respond.
I honestly don't know how to interpret your message.
All I really got from it is stop responding.
-
The math involved is not demonic or angelic.
Gray2023 locuta est, causa finita est ::)
He was making number statements and rounding them to the closest 666 number just to make it seem that it was all about the occult. Numbers have meaning if they are true and natural, but manipulating them to make a point is just click bait.
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.
Making a comment on my own opinion is a strawman? How?
And I don't understand why you have such an emotional response to a post that was obviously humor. If I said their was no snark intended, and you say there was, who is right? Me the one who made the comment or you who already has a bias about who you think I am, and what you think I do.
"Emotional tirade", the fact I never said or implied that, the fact that I never said or implied it wasn't an attempt at humor. Yes, strawman. And now gaslighting as well. I'm having an "emotional response" :laugh1: what you say now doesn't change the fact that your deboonker dunk is still visible for all to see
I can take the heat. I have been taking the heat for two years now on CathInfo.
I just find it silly that when someone can't respond directly to a person's opinion the next option is to just make a personal comment. The only reason to say negative things about someone is so others will think negatively about that person. I guess some people just feel better about themself, when they put other people down.
You have indeed :smirk: I know this discussion (about someone being rude) may be "therapeutic" for you but it doesn't concern me at all, and I'm not going to be further dragged into you using the forum to "release your frustrations"..an exercise which you "like" using CI as a medium to accomplish
-
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.
"Emotional tirade", the fact I never said or implied that, the fact that I never said or implied it wasn't an attempt at humor. Yes, strawman. And now gaslighting as well. I'm having an "emotional response" :laugh1: what you say now doesn't change the fact that your deboonker dunk is still visible for all to see
You have indeed :smirk: I know this discussion (about someone being rude) may be "therapeutic" for you but it doesn't concern me at all, and I'm not going to be further dragged into you using the forum to "release your frustrations"..an exercise which you "like" using CI as a medium to accomplish
We all use CathInfo to express our own opinions. Most of the prolific posters are probably getting some sort of dopamine rush.
This is getting very tiresome. I know that sometimes I do not express myself to the liking of the people who post frequently. What I don't understand is you (WorldsAway) thinking you have the authority to put me in my place. The thing I find the most funny is the energy you waste in trying to do so. The bigger question is why have you decided this is your duty to do so? Why do my words affect you so?
And as for the topic at hand. I don't care if NASA is occultish or not. I just think the video was not being honest to make the point they were trying to make. These days too many people try to make everything some sort of secret complicated thing. Simplicity is best.
-
This is getting very tiresome.
And yet you keep going, because you enjoy it.
Remember, this discussion (unrelated to the topic of the thread) began because you strawmanned my original post and then tried to drag me into giving you my opinion about the "rude" thing someone else said to you. I had nothing to do with that, yet you desired my opinion on it because this sort of discussion is "therapeutic" for you, and there was no one else in the thread to talk about it with
Again (I need to follow my own advice!):
I know this discussion...may be "therapeutic" for you but...I'm not going to be further dragged into you using the forum to "release your frustrations"..an exercise which you "like" using CI as a medium to accomplish
And as for the topic at hand. I don't care if NASA is occultish or not. I just think the video was not being honest to make the point they were trying to make. These days too many people try to make everything some sort of secret complicated thing. Simplicity is best.
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.
Under further scrutiny what was proposed in the video may not hold up, I've never claimed otherwise, but your attempted debunk was not sufficient.
-
And yet you keep going, because you enjoy it.
Remember, this discussion (unrelated to the topic of the thread) began because you strawmanned my original post and then tried to drag me into giving you my opinion about the "rude" thing someone else said to you. I had nothing to do with that, yet you desired my opinion on it because this sort of discussion is "therapeutic" for you, and there was no one else in the thread to talk about it with
Again (I need to follow my own advice!):
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.
Under further scrutiny what was proposed in the video may not hold up, I've never claimed otherwise, but your attempted debunk was not sufficient.
:facepalm:
-
I honestly don't know how to interpret your message.
All I really got from it is stop responding.
It was 2 separate thoughts: one being to make light of it, the other was to imitate Jesus in whatever way is most appropriate.
-
It was 2 separate thoughts: one being to make light of it, the other was to imitate Jesus in whatever way is most appropriate.
Thank you for the clarification I appreciate it. I think I might just be a bit oversensitive right now.
We should all try to imitate Jesus.
-
I wrongly assumed that people here are already well-aware of the satanic foundations of NASA. The numerology angle is minor compared to what is already known. Here's background info to provide context.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJJfuPFlA_A
-
The Occult Roots of NASA and the Ongoing Fraud
1. NASA as a Fraudulent Institution
The article asserts that NASA (dubbed “Never A Straight Answer”) is a massive hoax, alleging that the Apollo moon landings were staged. It claims NASA operates as a financial embezzlement scheme, wasting taxpayer money ($30 billion for the Apollo program) on pseudoscience and Hollywood-style productions. The author argues that NASA’s credibility is irreparably damaged by systemic fraud, with no tangible benefits to the public.
2. Occult Origins of NASA
The piece highlights the occult and satanic influences behind NASA’s founding, focusing on key figures:
- Jack Parsons: A rocket scientist and occultist who co-founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Parsons was a disciple of Aleister Crowley, practiced black magic, and allegedly took an “Oath of the Antichrist.” The article suggests his contributions to rocketry are overshadowed by his occult activities.
- Aleister Crowley: A notorious satanist and leader of the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.), who influenced Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard. Crowley is described as the “Great Beast 666” and a central figure in NASA’s occult roots.
- L. Ron Hubbard: Founder of Scientology, Hubbard is portrayed as a manipulative figure who practiced “sex magic” with Parsons and later distanced himself from his occult past. The article links Scientology to mind control and financial exploitation.
- Werner von Braun: A former nαzι recruited under Operation Paperclip, portrayed as the “most normal” of the group despite his nαzι ties.
- Walt Disney: Accused of being an occultist, freemason, and pedophile, Disney is tied to NASA through propaganda and mass mind control.
3. NASA’s Ties to Secret Societies and the Military-Industrial Complex
The article claims NASA is a “Military-Masonic Controlled Entity” serving the interests of the “Khazarian Mafia” (a term used to describe a supposed global elite). It alleges that:
- NASA funnels taxpayer money into defense contractors (e.g., Raytheon, Boeing) owned by institutions like Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street Corp.
- The space program is a front for black ops projects and advanced military technology hidden from the public.
- Hollywood (controlled by the same elites) perpetuates NASA’s mythology through sci-fi propaganda.
4. Pseudoscience and the Cold War Hoax
The author compares NASA’s methods to Soviet pseudoscience under Trofim Lysenko, arguing that both the U.S. and USSR faked the Cold War to justify massive spending. NASA is accused of using “Lysenkoism” (false dogma enforced by repetition) to deceive the public about space exploration.
5. Conclusion: NASA as a Satanic Financial Scam
The article concludes that NASA is a satanic, Masonic, and financial fraud, designed to embezzle taxpayer funds while spreading disinformation. It calls NASA the “biggest black hole” for money, with its origins and operations rooted in occultism, mind control, and elite corruption.
Key Themes
- Conspiracy: NASA’s achievements are fabricated, and its true purpose is financial exploitation.
- Occultism: Founders like Parsons and Crowley embedded satanic rituals into NASA’s foundation.
- Elite Control: The “Khazarian Mafia” and Freemasons allegedly pull NASA’s strings for profit and power.
- Pseudoscience: NASA’s space missions are compared to Soviet-era fake science.
https://nonorthodoxy.com/the-occult-roots-of-nasa-and-the-ongoing-fraud/
-
Old video very difficult to find.
https://archive.org/details/texe-marrs-the-eagle-has-landed
-
NASA is a danger to “climate change”. They destroyed the earth because they work for their god Satan.
-
I can take the heat. I have been taking the heat for two years now on CathInfo.
I just find it silly that when someone can't respond directly to a person's opinion the next option is to just make a personal comment. The only reason to say negative things about someone is so others will think negatively about that person. I guess some people just feel better about themself, when they put other people down.
Lol. I always get beat up and in real life too.