Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: NASA's obsession with 666  (Read 8816 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: NASA's obsession with 666
« Reply #15 on: July 14, 2025, 05:34:42 AM »
Quote from: St Giles on July 13, 2025, 10:23:42 PM
Maybe you need to start a badge of honor list for yourself like Johannes did: Stands accused of being a "brainwashed clown" and a "deboonker", and see how many you can collect. Jesus was called worse, and didn't respond.
I honestly don't know how to interpret your message.

All I really got from it is stop responding.  
Logged

Offline WorldsAway

Re: NASA's obsession with 666
« Reply #16 on: July 14, 2025, 05:41:55 AM »
Quote from: Gray2023 on July 13, 2025, 09:31:47 PM
The math involved is not demonic or angelic.

Gray2023 locuta est, causa finita est ::)

  He was making number statements and rounding them to the closest 666 number just to make it seem that it was all about the occult.  Numbers have meaning if they are true and natural, but manipulating them to make a point is just click bait.
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed. 



Quote from: Gray2023 on July 13, 2025, 09:39:30 PM
Making a comment on my own opinion is a strawman?  How? 

And I don't understand why you have such an emotional response to a post that was obviously humor.  If I said their was no snark intended, and you say there was, who is right?  Me the one who made the comment or you who already has a bias about who you think I am, and what you think I do.
"Emotional tirade", the fact I never said or implied that, the fact that I never said or implied it wasn't an attempt at humor. Yes, strawman. And now gaslighting as well. I'm having an "emotional response" :laugh1: what you say now doesn't change the fact that your deboonker dunk is still visible for all to see

Quote from: Gray2023 on July 13, 2025, 09:44:26 PM
I can take the heat.  I have been taking the heat for two years now on CathInfo.


I just find it silly that when someone can't respond directly to a person's opinion the next option is to just make a personal comment.  The only reason to say negative things about someone is so others will think negatively about that person.  I guess some people just feel better about themself, when they put other people down.
You have indeed :smirk: I know this discussion (about someone being rude) may be "therapeutic" for you but it doesn't concern me at all, and I'm not going to be further dragged into you using the forum to "release your frustrations"..an exercise which you "like" using CI as a medium to accomplish
Logged

Offline Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: NASA's obsession with 666
« Reply #17 on: July 14, 2025, 06:15:25 AM »
Quote from: WorldsAway on July 14, 2025, 05:41:55 AM
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.


"Emotional tirade", the fact I never said or implied that, the fact that I never said or implied it wasn't an attempt at humor. Yes, strawman. And now gaslighting as well. I'm having an "emotional response" :laugh1: what you say now doesn't change the fact that your deboonker dunk is still visible for all to see
You have indeed :smirk: I know this discussion (about someone being rude) may be "therapeutic" for you but it doesn't concern me at all, and I'm not going to be further dragged into you using the forum to "release your frustrations"..an exercise which you "like" using CI as a medium to accomplish
We all use CathInfo to express our own opinions.  Most of the prolific posters are probably getting some sort of dopamine rush.

This is getting very tiresome.  I know that sometimes I do not express myself to the liking of the people who post frequently. What I don't understand is you (WorldsAway) thinking you have the authority to put me in my place.  The thing I find the most funny is the energy you waste in trying to do so.  The bigger question is why have you decided this is your duty to do so?  Why do my words affect you so?  

And as for the topic at hand.  I don't care if NASA is occultish or not.  I just think the video was not being honest to make the point they were trying to make.  These days too many people try to make everything some sort of secret complicated thing.  Simplicity is best.
Logged

Offline WorldsAway

Re: NASA's obsession with 666
« Reply #18 on: July 14, 2025, 07:28:23 AM »
Quote from: Gray2023 on July 14, 2025, 06:15:25 AM
This is getting very tiresome.
And yet you keep going, because you enjoy it.

Remember, this discussion (unrelated to the topic of the thread) began because you strawmanned my original post and then tried to drag me into giving you my opinion about the "rude" thing someone else said to you. I had nothing to do with that, yet you desired my opinion on it because this sort of discussion is "therapeutic" for you, and there was no one else in the thread to talk about it with

Again (I need to follow my own advice!):
Quote
I know this discussion...may be "therapeutic" for you but...I'm not going to be further dragged into you using the forum to "release your frustrations"..an exercise which you "like" using CI as a medium to accomplish


Quote from: Gray2023 on July 14, 2025, 06:15:25 AM
And as for the topic at hand.  I don't care if NASA is occultish or not.  I just think the video was not being honest to make the point they were trying to make.  These days too many people try to make everything some sort of secret complicated thing.  Simplicity is best.
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.

Under further scrutiny what was proposed in the video may not hold up, I've never claimed otherwise, but your attempted debunk was not sufficient.
Logged

Offline Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: NASA's obsession with 666
« Reply #19 on: July 14, 2025, 08:22:06 AM »
Quote from: WorldsAway on July 14, 2025, 07:28:23 AM
And yet you keep going, because you enjoy it.

Remember, this discussion (unrelated to the topic of the thread) began because you strawmanned my original post and then tried to drag me into giving you my opinion about the "rude" thing someone else said to you. I had nothing to do with that, yet you desired my opinion on it because this sort of discussion is "therapeutic" for you, and there was no one else in the thread to talk about it with

Again (I need to follow my own advice!):
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.

Under further scrutiny what was proposed in the video may not hold up, I've never claimed otherwise, but your attempted debunk was not sufficient.
:facepalm:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
« previous next »