Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7

Author Topic: Mount Everest from 2,000 Miles Away  (Read 10828 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Predestination2

Re: Mount Everest from 2,000 Miles Away
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2025, 07:56:48 PM »
Refraction can only bring seven times the horizon into sight according to ChatGPT. Yet this would have to be 20 times the horizon. Magic refraction can’t help these globes now 
Logged

Offline Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: Mount Everest from 2,000 Miles Away
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2025, 09:38:05 PM »
I guess they could be the mountains or they could be cloud formations.  I don't know the pictures are poor quality. 

I talked to a pilot recently and a nuclear scientist and the pilot said he could see the curve and the nuclear scientist said that engineering tables take the curvature of the earth into consideration when doing structure calculations.  These Catholic men must be horrible Catholics and are in on the deception. :cowboy:

I am just putting thoughts out there.  Same as you.

https://www.mathscinotes.com/2017/12/earths-curvature-and-battleship-gunnery/
Logged

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Re: Mount Everest from 2,000 Miles Away
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2025, 11:02:07 PM »
Quote from: Gray2023 on May 18, 2025, 09:38:05 PM
These Catholic men must be horrible Catholics and are in on the deception.

Nope, just brainwashed.  Not a huge surprise.  Pilots are trained with the specific presumption that the world is flat and stationary.  No one sees a curve because it isn't there.  Nuclear scientist and structural calculations?  Uh, and he deals with such things when and how?  Any specific evidence or examples would be greatly appreciated.

Cloud formations? :laugh1:
Logged

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Mount Everest from 2,000 Miles Away
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2025, 11:13:48 PM »

Quote
Nuclear scientist and structural calculations?  Uh, and he deals with such things when and how?
Exactly, what a load of BS.  Since when does a nuclear scientist 


a) build a nuclear reactor building? (that would be done by an engineer)

b) what does a nuclear reactor have to do with the earth curvature?  

c) what does structural engineering have to do with the earths curvature?  Even if a building were 1/2 mile long, the curvature of the earth would only be 4 inches.  Not something that would even need a special calculation for.  

This makes no sense.  
Logged

Offline Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: Mount Everest from 2,000 Miles Away
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2025, 11:23:19 PM »
Quote from: gladius_veritatis on May 18, 2025, 11:02:07 PM
Nope, just brainwashed.  Not a huge surprise.  Pilots are trained with the specific presumption that the world is flat and stationary.  No one sees a curve because it isn't there.  Nuclear scientist and structural calculations?  Uh, and he deals with such things when and how?  Any specific evidence or examples would be greatly appreciated.

Cloud formations? :laugh1:
Well tell me what is you area of expertise.  Are you in an engineering or science field?  Are you a pilot?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
« previous next »