Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Is that you Judith?  (Read 2915 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is that you Judith?
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2022, 01:51:17 PM »
The problem here is that when you have a vacuum next to a pressurized system (such as our atmosphere), the gas in that pressurized system will move to fill that vacuum unless there is a physical barrier between the two (like a Firmament). Modern science proposes the retarded idea that gravity is strong enough to keep everything, including gases and liquids, affixed to the surface of a ball and prevent it from being instantly pulled into the vacuum; but not strong enough to prevent a helium balloon from defying it. Now, if there's a matter of not gravity, but density and buoyancy, then what we see practically makes more sense as the lighter objects are displaced by the heavier materials.

Therefore, if "space" is an actual thing, then it is most certainly NOT a vacuum, but is filled with an even lighter material, such as ether, which explains how light and heat and other forms of energy are transferred through this supposed vacuum.

Quick video on the problem with the space "vacuum" - 3 mins
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g6yl8mD3RGhG/

Indeed, the problem of the earth's atmosphere being adjacent to the near-infinite vacuum of space (or so we are told) was for me one of the final nails in the coffin of the official narrative about the earth being a ball floating through space (well, rocketing through space at something like 1.3 million miles per hour ... while we feel nothing).

Another incredibly compelling argument for at least a stationary earth is where someone pointed out that if we're revolving around the sun while rotating, depending on whether you're rotating away from or rotating toward the revolution of the earth, there would be an overall change of acceleration ... which would be clearly felt on earth.  Globers claim that we don't feel the motion of the earth because it's at a consistent speed, causing there to be no change of acceleration which would be required to sense the motion.  But that is clearly untrue when you consider that the earth would (in their model) be revolving around the sun, but then depending on the time of day and where you're at, you'd be rotating in the direction of the revolution or else rotating away from it.

Also, for stationary earth, you have Michelson Morley AND Airy's "Failure" ... a term applied to dismiss the results, but Airy proved quite conclusively that the stars move relative to the earth and not the earth relative to the stars.

Offline St Giles

  • Supporter
Re: Is that you Judith?
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2022, 02:00:48 PM »
The problem here is that when you have a vacuum next to a pressurized system (such as our atmosphere), the gas in that pressurized system will move to fill that vacuum unless there is a physical barrier between the two (like a Firmament). Modern science proposes the retarded idea that gravity is strong enough to keep everything, including gases and liquids, affixed to the surface of a ball and prevent it from being instantly pulled into the vacuum; but not strong enough to prevent a helium balloon from defying it. Now, if there's a matter of not gravity, but density and buoyancy, then what we see practically makes more sense as the lighter objects are displaced by the heavier materials.

Therefore, if "space" is an actual thing, then it is most certainly NOT a vacuum, but is filled with an even lighter material, such as ether, which explains how light and heat and other forms of energy are transferred through this supposed vacuum.

Quick video on the problem with the space "vacuum" - 3 mins
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g6yl8mD3RGhG/
This topic has already been covered not long ago. A vacuum can't exert force. It cannot give what it does not have. Air has force in the form of heat, which causes particles to vibrate and collide with each other. We know for a fact, or can easily prove by experiment, that an increase in temperature increases the force in air marked by an increase in pressure in a contained volume. We know gravity exists, it is also a force. Gravity can attract air to the source of the gravity, but a vacuum can't attract air away. Only the pressure of the air caused by its temperature can force the air away from the source of gravity. In doing this, it gives our atmosphere the thickness it has.

Imagine a crowd of tightly packed people. If they all extended their arms to push each other away, the crowd would expand in size by a finite amount governed by the length of people's arms. There is also a limit to how far the air molecules can push each other away. Without gravity and in a vacuum, they would push each other away initially and keep flying apart. With gravity, there is now an imbalance of force such that the air can still push away, but the majority will tend toward occupying the space near the source of gravity. Air pushed away at the edge of space will be drawn back by gravity until it eventually collides with more air to get kicked away again. There will be a decrease of air density farther away from the ground because gravity weakens (as far as I know) the farther something is from the source, and there is no barrier trapping the air from escaping some distance, and with all of the air being pulled by gravity, the air near the ground also feels the weight of the air above it.

As for helium, it is a much lighter weight atom than air molecules and even the individual atoms that form them.

I don't think space needs to be filled with ether for energy to flow through it, but at the same time I am open to such a theory. Perhaps this so called ether is like a place holder on the smallest size of anything that can exist, and maybe it holds a minimal dimensional value to appear nonexistent until matter or energy crosses that point. Like a resolution of the universe as if it was made of pixels, but perhaps not limited to just 3 dimensions, but more including gravity, time, or others.


Offline St Giles

  • Supporter
Re: Is that you Judith?
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2022, 02:10:46 PM »
Indeed, the problem of the earth's atmosphere being adjacent to the near-infinite vacuum of space (or so we are told) was for me one of the final nails in the coffin of the official narrative about the earth being a ball floating through space (well, rocketing through space at something like 1.3 million miles per hour ... while we feel nothing).

Another incredibly compelling argument for at least a stationary earth is where someone pointed out that if we're revolving around the sun while rotating, depending on whether you're rotating away from or rotating toward the revolution of the earth, there would be an overall change of acceleration ... which would be clearly felt on earth.  Globers claim that we don't feel the motion of the earth because it's at a consistent speed, causing there to be no change of acceleration which would be required to sense the motion.  But that is clearly untrue when you consider that the earth would (in their model) be revolving around the sun, but then depending on the time of day and where you're at, you'd be rotating in the direction of the revolution or else rotating away from it.

Also, for stationary earth, you have Michelson Morley AND Airy's "Failure" ... a term applied to dismiss the results, but Airy proved quite conclusively that the stars move relative to the earth and not the earth relative to the stars.
You see the effect of going from atmosphere to vacuum when watching videos of rockets entering space. It can be seen both from the onboard cameras, and at night from the ground. The rocket exhaust changes suddenly from a narrow stream to a very wide spray.

Re: Is that you Judith?
« Reply #13 on: July 20, 2022, 03:52:09 PM »
We know gravity exists, it is also a force
Literally all modern scientists disagree with that and claim the Einsteinian theory that gravity is the warping of "space-time."

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is that you Judith?
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2022, 03:56:00 PM »
You see the effect of going from atmosphere to vacuum when watching videos of rockets entering space. It can be seen both from the onboard cameras, and at night from the ground. The rocket exhaust changes suddenly from a narrow stream to a very wide spray.

That doesn't even come close to addressing the issue.  And, no, that's not vacuum but thinning of the atmosphere.