As I understand it, The English form of Masonry wasn't so virulent as the one England deliberately exported to France, in order to destablise The Monarcy and The Church in France, so that they could get a regime in France that they could get more control over, like they had managed to do in their own country, with their "Glorious Revolution" of 1688.  

"The Revolution permanently ended any chance of Catholicism becoming re-established in England. For British Catholics its effects were disastrous both socially and politically: Catholics were denied the right to vote and sit in the Westminster Parliament for over a century; they were also denied commissions in the army, and the monarch was forbidden to be Catholic or to marry a Catholic, this latter prohibition remaining in force until 2015. The Revolution led to limited tolerance for Nonconformist Protestants, although it would be some time before they had full political rights. It has been argued, mainly by Whig historians, that James's overthrow began modern English parliamentary democracy: the Bill of Rights 1689 has become one of the most important docuмents in the political history of Britain and never since has the monarch held absolute power."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution

The Moon's Phases can be explained on a Flat Earth Model too.  Are you claiming they can't be?  

This is perhaps going off-topic, though I think that it is related somehow - maybe.

This is perhaps going off-topic, though I think that it is related somehow - maybe.

I don't know much about the English form of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, or it's role in the French Revolution, but it would make sense that as the revolution against Catholicism in England preceded that of the French Revolution, and the French Revolution was, of course,  primarily an attack on the Church, rather than being about "liberating the downtrodden" in France, as is generally believed by the world today, that the two events may be connected, and facilitated by Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.

According to Hilaire Belloc, the reason that the English Monarchy lost its power was because the landowner elites worked their way into the English parliament, and became so powerful that they began to have more influence than the Monarchy. The power of the landowning elite in England happened after the English Reformation, in which, according to Belloc, the English government took over all of the property that had been owned by the Catholic Church (roughly a third of the land in England).

There were certain landowning families in England who petitioned the government to give them, or to sell for cheap, most of the property formerly owned by the Church, which the English government unfortunately consented to do. Thus, after acquiring large tracts of land, these families (who were not Catholic of course) became very powerful, and they basically took over and became a ruling elite, not only because they were wealthy landowners, but because they were members of parliament also. This is how the Catholic way of life in England came to an end, and with it came an end to private ownership of land for many of the English. And it was the beginning of the influence end for the English Monarchy too, but maybe that's not such a bad thing, since the monarchy has not been Catholic for a very long time.

Belloc describes this scenario in his book, "The Servile State."