Neil,
They have not been debunked at all. Please provide references of this so called debunking. Everybody is still waiting for you to explain where the missing 500 feet went to in the first video. You just didn't respond, so it stands to reason you won't even look at the other two.
These provide proof that there is no curvature on the flat earth.
Being paid, most likely, for your contributions here on Cathinfo, you have a vested interest in saying silly, unsubstantiated things like this. Throw enough mud and some of it will stick.
.
Yes, they most certainly HAVE been debunked from start to finish, kiwiboy-with-alzheimer's.
If you can't remember my earlier responses where I went to the trouble of repeating my annotations of those silly videos, why then would you be able to recognize them if I were to do it yet again?
.
You don't hear my answer the first time, or the second time so why would you hear it the third time?
.
There is no "missing 500 feet" as you say, the elevation above sea level at the top of the hill is not included in the calculation for the view at a distance, and the proximity of the water to the shoreline videos is not recognized in regards to how it obscures the view of the distant hills. This is why a sailor climbed into the crow's nest to see afar off, because from up there he got a view that those down on the deck were incapable of getting. Ships with crow's nests were able to win naval battles, so that's why they had them and used them. On a "flat" earth a crow's nest wouldn't make enough difference to make it an advantage.
.
These videos provide no proof whatsoever because they're cheap, amateurish nonsense.
.
Who is paying you for your posts here? Why do you bother? If you were not being paid you would have to be an idiot.
.
Okay, then maybe that's the answer. I rest my case.
.
You're just flailing in the wind, accomplishing nothing, and being rude in the process.
.