I said I have researched it (flat earth) from a Scientific and Religious point of view. I did not say either way. I lean toward it is not flat. That does not mean I'm correct, but WHO CARES, it does not have any real significance in this life. We can still go to heaven if we believe it's a globe and no one can prove it's flat from Scripture.

Myrna and even steven,

I can understand that with the amount of threads on the subject and fluff in them, it can be hard to find proof that the earth is flat.

Here are some videos to start you off.

Most of your posts on this thread argue against a flat earth. St. Basil didn't do that.

The ancient Hebrews believed in a flat earth, based on scripture. Maybe you think that they were wrong to do so?

.
And you so much enjoy practicing it by laughing at yourself.  
.

.
AnEvenSeven is attempting to bring the inconsistencies and self-contradictions of flat-earthers to their attention, in hopes they will stop making themselves look so foolish.
.
But that presumes they would have the humility to consider they've been wrong all along.
.
You will never find anything in Sacred Scripture that describes the earth as being "flat" nor will you ever find the Church teaching flat-earthism.
.
There are writings of the saints and fathers of the Church that can be misinterpreted to appear as though they were trying to teach flat-earthism, but let's be realistic. If they really had thought that the physical shape of the earth is a matter of faith or morals, don't you suppose they might have said so at some point? They had centuries to say it, yet, NOT A WORD.
.
The real disservice flat-earthers are committing here is they are (perhaps unwittingly) dragging traditional Catholicism down with their inane and patently false statements and lousy argumentation. They don't answer questions, even when asked repeatedly. They abandon entire segments of this and other forums when they find competent resistance to their transparently ludicrous nonsense.
.
They do not address the substance of the issues and instead attack the person who presents the message.
.
They jump topic, ostensibly answering a question when in fact providing what might qualify as a response to a DIFFERENT question, which was NOT asked.
.
They resort to garbage propositions such as the sun is an electric light bulb, there are no such things as sunspots, the moon is translucent because you can see stars shining through it, the sun shining on the moon is not what makes the moon's phases appear to us on earth, the moon did not move in front of the sun during the Great American Eclipse of August 21st, 2017, "globe-earthers" have no explanation for solar eclipses, and last but by far not the least "the horizon always rises to the level of the observer."
.
The horizon rather stays exactly where it is, and the eye of the observer being unaware of what level line of sight is, casts its direction downward toward the horizon where it sees in the receding distance where the earth's curvature quietly drops down out of sight.
.

You are putting FE in the same or similar category with those other Dogmas you listed.