1. The FE model isn't as bad or non-existent as you make out.
2. It's better than the current Globe model!
3. I reject your whole premise. So until I figure out exactly what happened (who/when/what) on the morning of 9/11, we just have to go along and assume the Official Story is correct? BULLCRAP! I can call BS without having the truth in my back pocket. I am allowed to call out lies without knowing the full and complete truth of the matter.
So if a child lies to his father about what happened to the living room, the father can't attack or condemn the lies until he knows exactly what DID happen? Until he has "an accurate, working model" or version of what happened? Again, NO.
Yes it's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness. But if you don't have a match or other light source handy, you ARE allowed to just curse the darkness. It's better than nothing -- better than embracing the darkness.
You seem to be stuck on the original adage -- "It's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness." And furthermore, you're expecting WAY TOO MUCH about what an adequate candle consists of.
THIS^^^. I've made the same point with him and he just ignored it and keeps reposting his "model" contention. Globe Model has many problems with, but Quo just applies his confirmation bias to pretend that it's 100% accurate, but in reality he doesn't know enough about either model to be able to actually give details. He just keep reiterating this "model" claim like a mindless parrot. It was like on another thread where he just kept pasting in his "450 years" nonsense.
Even if the FE Model is not complete and has lots of gaps, this doesn't mean that the Globe Model has not been falsified. Globe is falsified by all the evidence presented by FEs, so there's a false dilemma dichotomy here too, assuming that unless the FE model can be 100% complete, the GE model is true.
Fallacy:
petitio principii Begging the Question that the GE model is accurate or true.
Fallacy:
falsum dilemma +
argumentum ad ignorantiam False Dilemma or False Dichotomy combined with argument to ignorance, where if the FE Model isn't 100% accurate, then the GE model is 100% accurate.
Bottom Line: Globe Model is falsified, whether or not the FE model is 100% adequate.
After all, isn't that the "scientific method"? Once something has been falsified, you come up with another hypothesis, and then the hypothesis can be revised as new measurements, finding, and evidence is brought to light ... until it too is completely falsified and another hypothesis has to be proposed.