Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?  (Read 4865 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JoeZ

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 348
  • Reputation: +224/-27
  • Gender: Male
Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
« Reply #30 on: January 14, 2024, 09:51:37 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I got to step 3.5, considering thats as far as I could go based on contradictions and insufficiently strong evidence on both sides, but later went back to a very high level of confidence that the earth is a globe based on evidence I can see in person and reason out myself.

    Evidence like 1) observing the evening sunlight shining up from below cloud level, illuminating the underside of clouds and, casting shadows of the clouds and land features upward.

    2) observing the morning sunlight do the same as far as watching it transition from below to above cloud level (of which I have a video, unfortunately it is likely poor quality, but I haven't checked it yet).

    3) yesterday I saw light rays or rather the shadows blocking the rays that lit up the perfectly clear sky in the evening, when the sun was BELOW the horizon. Must have been from mountains or sky scrapers.

    4) I have long ago watched a thin sliver of the moon grow and shrink over a few minutes( I'm guesstimating a half hour or less)  as the shadow of the earth changed based on the changing altitude of the horizon.

    5) if the sun just got farther away at night and was otherwise only a few hundred miles above the ground, it would look biggest at mid day, and tiny at morning and evening, but it always looks the same, occasionally even bigger at sunrise and set.

    6) in addition to number 5, the sunlight should not appear and disappear so quickly if the sun is just moving far away over flat ground, but night and day transitions are very fast as if the sun is going to the other side of a globe.

    7) I have noticed a pattern that I see most satellites in the late evening, or very early morning. Otherwise they disappear in the shadow of the earth somewhere overhead most other times of the night.
    Add to this list the North Star. What do we know about the it and what can be extrapolated from that?

    When and wherever Polaris can be seen from Earth it is always due north being within 1 degree of true north.
    It's inclination always matches the viewers latitude.
    The Big Dipper points to it and goes around it in a circle.

    If the Earth is flat we can calculate Polaris' height in the sky using a right angle. Line A is height, Line B is distance North Pole to latitude X, line C is hypotenuse. At 80°N line B is 690mi (69ish mi per latitude). Angle BC is 80°. Polaris is 3,913mi in height.

    Now move south and problems begin. At 3,913mi up Polaris will be about 20° inclination at 80°S latitude (690 mi north of the South Pole) but the reality is it can't be seen from there by a long shot. Polaris is actually 20° inclination at 20°N latitude which is approx Hawaii. But at that inclination in Hawaii, Polaris triangulates to 1,758mi altitude. The reason for the discrepancy is the viewers horizon is tangentially skewed up as he "slides" down the side of the sphere, bringing the North Star lower in inclination than just plain distance can account for.

    Also, if the Earth was flat, constellations (and all stars in general for that matter) should orbit celestial north in an apparent ellipse. Consider the Big Dipper pointing to the North Star as a plane or disk. That plane would have to be parallel to the flat earth and relatively low as shown above. Its height to radial travel distance ratio would be so low it would appear non circular.
    Pray the Holy Rosary.


    Offline JoeZ

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 348
    • Reputation: +224/-27
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #31 on: January 14, 2024, 10:04:04 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • We (globe truthers) also have the added difficulty of flat earth not having a working map to scrutinize. The constellations and distances between continents becomes very problematic in the southern hemisphere. Like for instance, show me a flat earth model where the Southern Cross can be seen from South Africa, South America, and Australia at the same time? I have tried to see how it could work and have asked for a working model but that hasn't happened.

    For the record, I am not all that married to the globe earth as to be bias. I once believed we went to the moon, but now don't. I once believed the earth moved and rotated but now don't. Flat earths gotta stop judging. You don't know me and it shows.

    I pray this helps,
    JoeZ
    Pray the Holy Rosary.


    Offline Marulus Fidelis

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 638
    • Reputation: +295/-83
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #32 on: January 15, 2024, 04:52:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I got to step 3.5, considering thats as far as I could go based on contradictions and insufficiently strong evidence on both sides, but later went back to a very high level of confidence that the earth is a globe based on evidence I can see in person and reason out myself.

    Evidence like 1) observing the evening sunlight shining up from below cloud level, illuminating the underside of clouds and, casting shadows of the clouds and land features upward.
    No, you didn't, thoroughly debunked by computer simulations.

    If the Earth was a ball the Sun would always cast a shadow of the Earth bulge on the under side of clouds forming a straight line. We don't observe that in reality but only when you simulate the Earth being a ball. It's on taboo conspiracy's channel.

    Offline St Giles

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 858
    • Reputation: +386/-65
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #33 on: January 15, 2024, 05:57:16 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • No, you didn't, thoroughly debunked by computer simulations.

    If the Earth was a ball the Sun would always cast a shadow of the Earth bulge on the under side of clouds forming a straight line. We don't observe that in reality but only when you simulate the Earth being a ball. It's on taboo conspiracy's channel.
    That was a pretty bad video. That's what really turned me sour on FE. TC has very often put out videos trying to prove FE while showing evidence that doesn't match up very well with whatever explanation they give, as if the channel is designed to deceive, or the analysts are just stubborn bad willed die hard FEs.

    If I remember correctly, they never discussed in that video any evidence provided by the simulation that proves GE, but instead said: aha, we've got them now, GE is once and for all proven false because of this shadow of the horizon on the clouds. Simultaneously I was thinking that they just proved GE and my personal real life observations in a simulation. They completely disregarded the fact that the simulation both showed the mountain casting a shadow up onto the clouds and the illumination of the underside of the clouds just like in real life.

    The explanation why the clear line from the shadow of the earth bulge is not clear in real life is for a few reasons.

    1) the distances in real life are much larger giving the boundary between light and shadow more time to mix, because light tends to scatter.

    2) air exists in real life, which causes much light to scatter and mix with the shadow.

    3) the bulge of the horizon is not perfectly smooth, but has hills, trees, buildings, mountains, plains, and rough (as far as light reflection is concerned) surfaces of water. These would break up that smooth shadow line, making it a more gradual and uneven transition.

    4) cloud patterns interfering with the sunlight before it reaches the horizon to cast a shadow back onto clouds further breaks up and scatters the light.

    I have seen this shadow when I've seen satellites in a clear night sky disappear overhead as they moved east away from the recently set sun and into the shadow of the earth.

    I might post some pictures of a demonstration of blending between the light and dark around a shadow boundary later today. The slightest mixing makes a huge difference when several miles of distance are involved in combination with the above causes for interference with a smooth line.
    "Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
    "Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
    "Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 42026
    • Reputation: +24049/-4346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #34 on: January 15, 2024, 07:55:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That was a pretty bad video.

    Right, because you say so.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 42026
    • Reputation: +24049/-4346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #35 on: January 15, 2024, 07:56:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's what really turned me sour on FE. TC has very often put out videos trying to prove FE while showing evidence that doesn't match up very well with whatever explanation they give, as if the channel is designed to deceive, or the analysts are just stubborn bad willed die hard FEs.

    Nonsense.  You set out hostile to FE and refusing to look at it with an open mind.  At least be honest with yourself.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 42026
    • Reputation: +24049/-4346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #36 on: January 15, 2024, 07:58:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Like for instance, show me a flat earth model where the Southern Cross can be seen from South Africa, South America, and Australia at the same time? I have tried to see how it could work and have asked for a working model but that hasn't happened.

    That's been dealt with very simply.  You just don't want to see it.  There's a certain window of a few minutes where the very West of Australia, the East of South America, and of course South Africa are all in darkness, and where they could see the Southern Cross at the same time.  This isn't even particularly difficult.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31243
    • Reputation: +27164/-495
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #37 on: January 15, 2024, 08:09:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • For the record, I am not all that married to the globe earth as to be bias. I once believed we went to the moon, but now don't. I once believed the earth moved and rotated but now don't.
    That was me from 2-7 years ago.

    I stopped believing in the Moon landings as soon as I looked into it at all. Let's just say that as a Trad, I've had an open mind to "unpopular opinions" (such as Trad Catholicism itself) since I was a child.

    I stopped believing in the rotating Earth when "The Princple" and "Galileo Was Wrong" movies came out several years ago. I never knew, before those movies, that scientists have tried to prove the earth moved for centuries and kept failing, and even proving the opposite without wanting to!
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 42026
    • Reputation: +24049/-4346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #38 on: January 15, 2024, 08:29:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That was me from 2-7 years ago.

    I stopped believing in the Moon landings as soon as I looked into it at all. Let's just say that as a Trad, I've had an open mind to "unpopular opinions" (such as Trad Catholicism itself) since I was a child.

    I stopped believing in the rotating Earth when "The Princple" and "Galileo Was Wrong" movies came out several years ago. I never knew, before those movies, that scientists have tried to prove the earth moved for centuries and kept failing, and even proving the opposite without wanting to!

    Yes, there are steps involved, but each step requires keeping an open mind and not simply "trusting" what we've been told by the "authorities".  Once you toss the credibility of NASA (moon landings, etc.) and move to geocentrism, both contrary to the claims of the established scientific orthodoxy, it should be much simpler to evaluate FE claims on their own merits.

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 581
    • Reputation: +227/-133
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #39 on: January 15, 2024, 10:47:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I never knew, before those movies, that scientists have tried to prove the earth moved for centuries and kept failing, and even proving the opposite without wanting to!

    That was my experience.  I just assumed the earth was spinning and flying through space because I'd been told that it was since I was born.  No one ever mentioned that large body of tests which tried to determine the speed and rotation but all came back as Nil.  As Michelson said (paraphrase), 'the data contradicted our presupposed idea that the earth moved.'  I guess he would know. lol

    Offline St Giles

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 858
    • Reputation: +386/-65
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #40 on: January 15, 2024, 11:42:21 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Right, because you say so.
    Oops, my bad. It's a great video because flat feathers say so, and they know best. ::)

    Nonsense.  You set out hostile to FE and refusing to look at it with an open mind.  At least be honest with yourself.
    Be honest with yourself and admit you are judging my intentions. "Judge not..."
    There's no way I could have come to the edge of falling into your step 4 of thinking FE is probably true if I hadn't honestly given it a fair and thorough chance. FE raises come good questions, but it's very insufficient. The best you have is line of sight arguments.

    Its stupid with regards to the original post. A guy sets out to see how far he can see, to then film himself at that long distance from locations he knows he can be seen from, in a valley of all places. He didn't just choose some random location and try to see if his camera could see something that should be hidden behind the curve. You may be onto something with the laser over water videos, but that was not a smart post.
    "Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
    "Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
    "Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"


    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #41 on: January 15, 2024, 11:43:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'd bet the moon landings happened and that the Earth is round. But what do I know? Not much on these two issues.

    I do notice that Jєωs aren't at all bothered by flat earthers and moon landing hoaxers. Bart Sibrel is a Jєω who thinks the h0Ɩ0cαųst happened. It would be interesting to investigate people who believe the earth is flat and that the moon landings were fake and see how easily they are manipulated by Jєωs.

    I once asked Ladislaus to refer me to an expert on the earth being flat. He mentioned some anonymous dude who claims to have a PhD. Surely there are better people than this.
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 42026
    • Reputation: +24049/-4346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #42 on: January 15, 2024, 11:57:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'd bet the moon landings happened and that the Earth is round. But what do I know? Not much on these two issues.

    I do notice that Jєωs aren't at all bothered by flat earthers and moon landing hoaxers. Bart Sibrel is a Jєω who thinks the h0Ɩ0cαųst happened. It would be interesting to investigate people who believe the earth is flat and that the moon landings were fake and see how easily they are manipulated by Jєωs.

    I once asked Ladislaus to refer me to an expert on the earth being flat. He mentioned some anonymous dude who claims to have a PhD. Surely there are better people than this.

    There are many experts out there in various fields, from former F-16 pilots, those who worked on targeting systems on submarines and aircraft carriers.  Dr. John D does have a Ph. D. in spectrometry, and JTolan used to work on satellite systems.  They're out there, but you just actually have to look.

    But you're hung up on "experts" when most of the so-called experts tells us that we evolved from monkeys, which in turn ultimately came from a primordial slime, after a Big Bang, and that we're hurtling through space on a ball at many thousands of miles per second.  They also told everyone that the jab was "safe and effective".

    As for Jєωs not being bothered by FE, which appears to be your only litmus test for anything, you present a single anecdotal sample of Sibrel, but neglect to consider that Jєωgle and Jєωtube are ruthlessly censoring FE and returning almost exclusively links to debunking efforts in their search engines.  Not all Jєωs are "in on" everything, as we have many Jєωs even in Israel opposing the Jєωιѕн action in Gaza, and there are even a handful that have studied and rejected the h0Ɩ0cαųst.  I recently saw a video of a Jєωιѕн guy who went to Auschwitz (wearing yarmulke and all) who ended up completely debunking the notion that any Jєωs were deliberately exterminated there.

    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #43 on: January 15, 2024, 12:09:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There are many experts out there in various fields, from former F-16 pilots, those who worked on targeting systems on submarines and aircraft carriers.  Dr. John D does have a Ph. D. in spectrometry, and JTolan used to work on satellite systems.  They're out there, but you just actually have to look.

    But you're hung up on "experts" when most of the so-called experts tells us that we evolved from monkeys, which in turn ultimately came from a primordial slime, after a Big Bang, and that we're hurtling through space on a ball at many thousands of miles per second.  They also told everyone that the jab was "safe and effective".

    As for Jєωs not being bothered by FE, which appears to be your only litmus test for anything, you present a single anecdotal sample of Sibrel, but neglect to consider that Jєωgle and Jєωtube are ruthlessly censoring FE and returning almost exclusively links to debunking efforts in their search engines.  Not all Jєωs are "in on" everything, as we have many Jєωs even in Israel opposing the Jєωιѕн action in Gaza, and there are even a handful that have studied and rejected the h0Ɩ0cαųst.  I recently saw a video of a Jєωιѕн guy who went to Auschwitz (wearing yarmulke and all) who ended up completely debunking the notion that any Jєωs were deliberately exterminated there.

    It's old news that there are Jєωs on opposite sides of issues. They're all trash. It doesn't matter if they're zionist or anti-zionist and it doesn't matter if they say the h0Ɩ0cαųst happened or not. Roger Guy-Dommergue is often trotted out as an example of a "good Jєω" who debunks the h0Ɩ0cαųst. There are no good Jєωs. They're all trash. They like to control both sides of any issue. Ron Unz is a fraud. So is David Stein/Cole. According to Leuchter he and Zundel agreed, in the late-80s, that Cole was an infiltrator, but Zundel decided Cole was useful for getting h0Ɩ0cαųst revisionism publicity. Dumb move on Zundel's part. He shouldn't have been so desperate.

    Please give me a top 10 list of the most impressive experts on the earth being flat.
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 581
    • Reputation: +227/-133
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Guy Accidentally Proves Flat Earth?
    « Reply #44 on: January 15, 2024, 12:29:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You may be onto something with the laser over water videos...

    Several of those exist and are recorded at minimal height.  What would that suggest or does that suggest anything?  Could you call that a demonstrable proof?