Maybe you need to start a badge of honor list for yourself like Johannes did: Stands accused of being a "brainwashed clown" and a "deboonker", and see how many you can collect. Jesus was called worse, and didn't respond.

Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.


"Emotional tirade", the fact I never said or implied that, the fact that I never said or implied it wasn't an attempt at humor. Yes, strawman. And now gaslighting as well. I'm having an "emotional response" what you say now doesn't change the fact that your deboonker dunk is still visible for all to see
You have indeed I know this discussion (about someone being rude) may be "therapeutic" for you but it doesn't concern me at all, and I'm not going to be further dragged into you using the forum to "release your frustrations"..an exercise which you "like" using CI as a medium to accomplish

And yet you keep going, because you enjoy it.

Remember, this discussion (unrelated to the topic of the thread) began because you strawmanned my original post and then tried to drag me into giving you my opinion about the "rude" thing someone else said to you. I had nothing to do with that, yet you desired my opinion on it because this sort of discussion is "therapeutic" for you, and there was no one else in the thread to talk about it with

Again (I need to follow my own advice!):
Again: Numbers do not have to be exact to a decimal to be significant or convey a meaning, consciously or subconsciously. Think, "close enough".
Saying, "erm, he's actually rounding 66.56 to 66.6..deboonked!" simply isn't going to cut it when it is an occult organization like NASA being discussed.

Under further scrutiny what was proposed in the video may not hold up, I've never claimed otherwise, but your attempted debunk was not sufficient.

It was 2 separate thoughts: one being to make light of it, the other was to imitate Jesus in whatever way is most appropriate.

• Jack Parsons: A rocket scientist and occultist who co-founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Parsons was a disciple of Aleister Crowley, practiced black magic, and allegedly took an “Oath of the Antichrist.” The article suggests his contributions to rocketry are overshadowed by his occult activities.
• Aleister Crowley: A notorious satanist and leader of the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.), who influenced Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard. Crowley is described as the “Great Beast 666” and a central figure in NASA’s occult roots.
• L. Ron Hubbard: Founder of Scientology, Hubbard is portrayed as a manipulative figure who practiced “sex magic” with Parsons and later distanced himself from his occult past. The article links Scientology to mind control and financial exploitation.
• Werner von Braun: A former nαzι recruited under Operation Paperclip, portrayed as the “most normal” of the group despite his nαzι ties.
• Walt Disney: Accused of being an occultist, freemason, and pedophile, Disney is tied to NASA through propaganda and mass mind control.

• NASA funnels taxpayer money into defense contractors (e.g., Raytheon, Boeing) owned by institutions like Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street Corp.
• The space program is a front for black ops projects and advanced military technology hidden from the public.
• Hollywood (controlled by the same elites) perpetuates NASA’s mythology through sci-fi propaganda.

• Conspiracy: NASA’s achievements are fabricated, and its true purpose is financial exploitation.
• Occultism: Founders like Parsons and Crowley embedded satanic rituals into NASA’s foundation.
• Elite Control: The “Khazarian Mafia” and Freemasons allegedly pull NASA’s strings for profit and power.
• Pseudoscience: NASA’s space missions are compared to Soviet-era fake science.