CathInfo.com

.
That's obviously all part of the Great Conspiracy!
.
Thank you for the video!
.

.

.
For those who don't want to spend the data watching a video, here's a still shot of ONE satellite.
.
Maybe if they kept the camera running for another hour they'd get a shot of another satellite?
.
That would be a group, wouldn't it?
.

.
Calling all flat-earthers!! Calling all flat-earthers!!
.
The little "x" like figure zipping across the bottom of the (spherical) sun is the International Space Station.
.
It goes by very quickly, which the photographers caught with their rapid frame (motor drive ?) camera.
.
We used to call them "motor drive" in the days of emulsion film but these days it's all digital.
.
Their page has the following: By the way, it’s not quite true that there was only one “spot” on Earth where the transit across the sun’s face was visible. But it is true that there was only one area where the eclipse was visible. Derek Kind – who was not far from the other team – also caught the transit:


.
If they'd have checked into sunspots they'd find out that the more magnification you use the more sunspots you can see. Which is a lot like this repeat demand for a "group of satellites" but in the opposite direction, because you can't really say there is only one sunspot or two or three, or if you can't see any then there are none. They're different sizes, so there are always sunspots, just whether your enlargement power is enough to see them is the only variable.
.

If you're going to shoot down the evidence before even reviewing it, why are you asking for evidence in the first place?

Review it first. Look at the photos. Go to the many sites which have the photos. Then write back.

.
Welcome to the world of flat-earthers.
.
They make repeated demands for "proof" but you know the'll say it doesn't count, so you ask them to promise they won't reject it for being CGI (for example) and then when they promise and you give them the evidence they asked for, they say it's fake anyway, because it's CGI.
.
The only thing they'll "write back" is "You Don't Have Any Proof."
.

Quote from: Truth is Eternal on Today at 01:03:27 PM

Quote

If you really believe satellites exist, post a picture showing several satellites in the picture frame. They don't have to be in a close group.

.
I can do as you ask, but I can only do it if you promise not to accuse me of posting CGI.
.
In fact, you already made this offer. Are you a man of your word, or are you a liar and a cheat?
.


Quote from: Truth is Eternal on Yesterday at 04:10:04 PM

Quote

Will you post a picture of a group of satellites in space if I promise not to say it's CGI?

.

.
Did you miss this post, like you miss so many other posts?
.