Ok, I have to stop you here and address just how badly this video destroyed so-called geodesy. Geodesic science admits, readily, that they form their model after creating a model for them to measure their model from. Seriously? That means it isn't a measurement of the real world, but a measurement from a model they created, after they assume it is a globe. Yep, that's pretty down and dirty. It's called begging the question. Even if you say they measure "the length of an arc corresponding to a geodetic latitude difference at two places along the meridian"...What? A meridian they created but never actually measured? They admit they don't measure anything real but all of it is assumed before they measure. Why? Because they can't measure an arc that doesn't exist. It's a scam. Earth isn't a ball. All the formulas are based on presumption. Talk about cheating. Later, the flat earthers literally destroy every other fake narrative in relation to this crazy scheme with all sorts of great arguments. Sorry Cassini, this is truly embarrassing for anyone who takes stock in this chimera.
Ladislaus:
That reminds me of the circular logic between the geological column and fossil records. They date fossils based on the geological column, and they date the geological column from the fossils in it.
O.K., I see what you mean, the assumption being that the Earth is a globe at the time. But isn't that similar to all the flat-earth 'sciences,' the assumption that the Earth is flat.
So then, let us go back to catholic flatearthers' assumption that the Bible reveals the Earth is flat, a far more important aspect of the debate than comparing astronomical assumptions. First a little history:
Although there were a few flat-earthers, by the time of Eratosthenes (300BC), followed by Strabo (300BC), Crates (200BC), and Ptolemy (1AD), the sphericity of the earth was accepted among the Greeks and Romans. Nor did this understanding change with the advent of Christianity. A few, at least two, and at most five early Christian fathers denied the spherically of earth by mistaking passages such as Ps.104:2-3 as geographical rather than metaphorical statements. On the other side tens of thousands of Christian theologians, poets, artists, and scientists took the spherical view throughout the early, medieval, and modern church. The point is that no educated person believed otherwise.’ -Jeffrey Russell: summary of Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians (1997)
“All persons of Columbus’ day, very much including the Roman Catholic prelates, knew the Earth was round. The Venerable Bede (673-735AD) taught that the world was round, as did Bishop Virgilius of Salzburg (700-784AD), Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179), and Thomas Aquinas (1224-74). All four ended up saints. Sphere was the title of the most popular medieval textbook on astronomy, written by the English scholastic John of Sacrobosco (1195-1256). It informed that not only the Earth but all heavenly bodies are spherical.’ --- Rodney Stark: Catholicism and Science, Stark, 9/2004.
Note the statue of the Child of Prague holding a global Earth with the Cross on top of it. Globus Crucriger has long represented the Christian God’s reign over the Earth. Further devotion to the image began in 1556 when Maria Manriquez de Lara took the statue of infant Jesus to Czechoslovakia from Spain. It is now in the church of Our Lady of Victory in Prague, an object of veneration.’
Then there is the Miraculous Medal. Its design was given to St Catherine Labouré by the Blessed Virgin Mary in Rue du Bac Paris in 1830. In her medal the Virgin stands upon Satan the snake atop a section of a globe, representing the entire world. Now our world is centred on the Earth, a globe from which Our Lady ascended into heaven and on which Mary will crush the head of the snake. Then there is the global moon, which is also associated with the Virgin Mary, reflecting as it does the light of the sun, just as Mary reflects the light of her Son on those Christians with faith.