CathInfo.com

I see where you are getting these arguments now. I only made it through 2/3 of the video. They make most, but not all of it, sound quite convincing during the introduction. Being open minded, I thought I might have to change my belief by the end, but after the introduction it became a bunch of weak arguments or basically just opinions. Aside from the opinions, the arguments are weak because they neglect known (or at least argued truths presented by the ball earth scientists) truths about the physics involved with a globe earth and technology interacting with nature around it. A submarine does not need to pitch down for the same reason an airplane does not need to. It's because of the variable buoyancy and density of the fluid they operate in, and the fact that gravity is pulling toward a central point which is straight down at any given point. The air as a whole is moving with the ground, but variations in wind speed are possible due to variable climates caused by landscape, altitude, cloud cover, and the energy input from the sun. Things like the earth spinning at 600mph or whatever concerns one guy because he has an erroneous mental image of the physics involved. Not everyone has very good skills for imagining things, and even then, understanding is personal and subjective. The numbers that happen to have three 6's in a row are common because it is a number, relatively small, and inevitably reached when counting. It is also common in calculations involving decimals because it resembles 2/3, which is a common fraction. Any time you have 2/3 of 1 with however many zeros, you get a bunch of 6's. Then there's the guy who said he could see a mast 30 miles out or whatever from his periscope. How tall is a ship? Plenty tall. And radars are not laser beams. They are a wide angle beam for scanning a lot of sky, or they would be useless for finding stuff. Lasers are for pointing stuff out, wide angle search lights are for finding stuff. So, a radar 50ft up on a ship could scan down over the horizon a ways, and definitely quite far at high altitudes. I see it all the time, when watching severe weather on the news weather radar on TV, poor storm cell detail at long distances because the radar beam can't see down low at long distances, only what is up high, which is less defined wind and rain details. Tracking tornadoes is easy and precise until around 40-50 miles out, and I think those radars reach to 100 or maybe 150 miles.

No need to be rude.  People need to sort through things.  That's smart.