Thank you very much Emile for including the attachment.  The voice certainly sounds like Fr. Peter Scott, SSPX, ordained to the priesthood by Abp. Lefebvre in 1988 and former District Superior of the U.S.  He was also rector of the SSPX seminary in Australia and over the years he has been in direct charge of at least 3 different schools, one in the U.S., one in Canada and one in Africa.  Both his voice and manner of speaking are very distinctive. (For comparison you can listen to a number of videos of Fr. Scott on YouTube.)

I found it disturbing to say the least when I heard Fr. Scott speak/teach/(pontificate?) in such a matter of fact way when he states the following at:
3:29  "It's scientifically proven that the Earth goes around the sun and that's a scientific fact."
4:44  "And there's no true scientist to deny the fact [of heliocentrism]"
4:57  "But there's no true scientist to deny the Earth is in orbit around the sun."

Sure, I understand people rejecting Flat Earth.  But geocentrism is another matter altogether, to the point that the Pope and the Holy Father considered it to be grave error and proximate to heresy to reject it.  So the derision is completely unacceptable.  He should at least maintain an attitude of respect for the learned men (including St. Robert Bellarmine) who thought otherwise.

Also unacceptable is his slavish submission to modern science, which is clearly animated by an atheistic agenda and cannot be trusted as reliable.

There is only one heresy that has been condemned by the Church that has been reversed and become accepted by churchmen (as distinct from the Church), heliocentrism. As we know, the heresy that came closest to dominate Catholicism in the past was the Arian heresy, but in that case St Athanasius I of Alexandria managed to convince all, including popes, of the truth, and the true divinity of Christ prevailed. In the case of the Galilean heresy, there was no Athanasius, merely a Fr Filippo Anfossi (1748-1825) Master of the Sacred Palace, Rome, 1820, and a few colleagues who fought with him to defend the geocentrism of Scripture. In that case however, intellectual pride won the battle and Pope Pius VII ruled that a heliocentrism without violent effects on Earth was no longer heresy and could be used to change the traditional meaning of Scripture. It was this decision that placed Modernism into the womb of the Church, a ploy by Satan, predicted by God in Scripture when he said that Satan was the Father of Lies and was capable of fooling even the elect.

Intelligence, the extent or ability of one’s reasoning, while a great gift from God comes with a high price tag, especially when engaging in matters challenging traditional Catholic dogma, theology, and metaphysics. Saint Augustine once affirmed: ‘If there were no pride, there would be no heresy.’ In 2015, an exorcist in Barcelona said of all the sins preferred by Satan, pride was the greatest. We all want to be clever, and the cleverer the better; fallen man revels in ‘vainglory in one’s own reasoning’ as Galileo boasted. Such a talent produces an interior, personal and social satisfaction that is irresistible to those that have it. It can bring honour, glory, respect, advantage, reward, and fame to some who excel in any given field of knowledge. Sir Francis Bacon understood this very well with his ‘knowledge itself is power.’ However, conforming and contributing to a consensus can be a path to success among one’s peers, but in regard to origins, the temptations involved here are enormous, for intelligence can also be the source of pride. The great intellectual saints such as Augustine, Aquinas, Bonaventure, and Bellarmine all knew that intellectual pride is an area that Satan has not neglected. These men refused accolades and honours, preferring instead to embrace humility and exalt divine authority and teaching. 

For if you did believe Moses, you would believe Me also;
for he wrote of Me.(John 5:46)

Now there are some priests of the SSPX who accept the Doctrine of Geocentrism, but they are silenced out of it by those like Fr Robinson and Fr Scott who are allowed talk their way around the teachings of the Church.

thankfully, 30 years ago, I, a farmer if you don't mind, who was educated as a heliocentrist and evolutionist, as we all were and still are, was given a book by my (late wife), who was a silent creationist and geocentrist at the time, a book by Thomas Mac Fadden on evolution. I took me fifteen minutes to realise that I was a fool to believe elephants evolved from sponges. I was so angry that I decided to educate myself and write a book to inform Catholics of the truth. Then came Pope John Paul; II remark that evolution was more than a hypothesis. Now who would take my word against a pope's so I gave it up. But then I was told by a Paul Ellwanger (RIP) that evolution was the baby of heliocentrism. He then sent me all the info on the matter he collected at his own expense. That began my 30 year research into the matter so that I could expose this more recent Arian-type heresy that did manage to pollute Catholicism. Alas, it is a story that most Catholics reject for many reasons including most Catholic forums. Thankfully CIF is different and do champion the fight against this long held heresy that has undermined the Fathers, Saints and theologians of Tradition who upheld the truth of Genesis, God creation as revealed by Him.

I will address Fr Scott directly in my next post.

Advocates of the geocentric globe model hold that the earth does not move. This means the earth cannot travel in a circuit around the sun, nor does it rotate on its axis.  Earth doesn't move, the sun does. Fair enough.

However, this creates a little problem. We all know that in the heliocentric model day/night is caused by the earth rotating on its axis. If there is no movement of the globe earth in geocentrism, because earth is stationary and unmoving, then this means that means that the sun is doing all the work. Therefore, in order for the earth to experience one single day and one single night, the sun would have to travel around the globe once every 24 hours. Geocentric globe theory teaches that the distance to the sun is 93 million miles, then one can calculate the distance the sun must travel going around the earth in a single 24 hour day.

If earth is the center, and the radius of this circuit (R) is the distance of 93 million miles, we can calculate the circuмference (C).

The equation is C = 2 x pi x R

C = 2 x 3.14 x 93 million miles

C = 584 million miles

So globe geocentric theory says that the sun makes a journey around the earth 584,000,000 miles each and every day? 584 MILLION miles every 24 hours?  That's a pretty serious speed of 24,300,000 MPH. Not even the sun can go 24 MILLION miles an hour. That would be 213,160,000,000 miles per year.  Not only that, the majority of stars further away than the sun would have to go faster still, and travel almost infinitely farther than the sun in that same 24 hours to maintain the constellations.  One has to wonder, how do the wandering stars operate in such ruckus?  Not even the heliocentric model claims such ridiculous motion since earth only goes 584 million miles per year, around the sun.  Both heliocentric and geocentric globe models are absurd.