It is a long story forlorn so I will try to shorten it for you and readers.

‘In 1978 Penzias and Wilson received the Nobel Prize in physics for their discovery of the CMR in 1965. Study of the CMB continued with the United States government’s agency the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In June, 2001 a satellite WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) was launched from Cape Canaveral aboard a Delta rocket. Then there was the European Space Agency’s PLANCK mission launched in 2009 to map the CMB in greater detail. By 2013 the cosmologists reckoned the temperature variations of the cosmos were now known and from these had conjured up a history of the universe since the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago. Throughout the world, in scientific institutions and universities, massive crowds turned out to hear of and see the ‘proofs’ the CMB had established for their Big Bang theory. One of these, they claim, was the first evolution of the stars from particles 200,000,000 years old. Hundreds of websites were created to show the world what their science had discovered. But the truth will out if you seek it that is:

‘Irrespective of how it originated, the most important fact about the CMR is that it represents unequivocal evidence of an absolute reference frame in the universe… I suggest [this] evidence which has received worldwide acclaim as confirmation of the Big Bang is really its death knell for, ironically, it is now clear that the existence of the CMR essentially falsifies the fundamental postulates of the theory of relativity [that there is no reference frame in the universe]… In simple terms, the theory of relativity has been falsified because a major prediction of the theory is now known to be contradicted by [another] unambiguous experimental result.’ (R. Gentry: Creation’s Tiny Mystery, Earth Science Associates, 2004, pp.284-5)

Good, someone did notice George Smoot's claim to have witnessed the variation in the CMB that showed the Earth’s movement in its supposed orbit. But now let us address Robert Gentry’s 2004 quote above: ‘Irrespective of how it originated, the most important fact about the CMR is that it represents unequivocal evidence of an absolute reference frame in the universe.’ One of these reference frames has become known as the ‘Axis of Evil,’

‘The light is the CMB, and it provides some of the best knowledge we have about the structure, content, and history of the Universe. But it also contains a few mysteries: on very large scales, the cosmos seems to have a certain lopsidedness. That slight asymmetry is reflected in temperature fluctuations much larger than any galaxy, aligned on the sky in a pattern facetiously dubbed “the axis of evil.” The lopsidedness is real, but cosmologists are divided over whether it reveals anything meaningful about the fundamental laws of physics.’ --- Arstecnica website.

During this time of discovery two scholars, Robert Sungenis and Richard Delano also took an interest in the CMB’s findings. To them, interpretation of the data shows the Earth sits at the centre of the universe.

‘All in all, there are three basic [CMB] alignments of the Earth with the universe:

(1) The cosmic microwave radiation’s dipole is aligned with the Earth’s equator.

(2) The cosmic microwave radiation’s quadrupole and octupole are aligned with the Earth‐Sun ecliptic.

(3) The distant quasars and radio galaxies are aligned with the Earth’s equator and the North Celestial Pole. Essentially, these three alignments provide the X, Y and Z coordinates to place Earth in the very center of the known universe.’ (Robert Sungenis: website, Debunking David Palm, 2014.)

apologies, posted twice instead of modify.

I have a small gripe about the wording "Heliocentrism of science".

I'd say Heliocentrism of modernism. Or Heliocentrism of modern scientists.

Otherwise we give up a very important vocabulary word to the modernists and perpetuate the myth that the Faith and science are opposed.

... most today don't know anything about what Modernism is. If anything they think it's a movement in modern art, or architecture, or furniture styles.
.

Maybe not Copernicus' Heliocentrism, but yes they do believe the Earth orbits the Sun.

.
It seems to me that "they" are very cautious to give the impression that they "believe" the earth orbits the sun, however, upon closer examination it would seem they have an abiding concern that perhaps the sun orbits the earth -- but they can't dare admit as much because far too many consequences hang in the balance.
.
For example, go to JPL and find out how they compute the landing and takeoff trajectory of rockets given that the earth is rotating on its axis and revolving around the sun with the whole solar system chugging along towards some common destination far, far away. You actually don't need to mention the second two movements. Just say, while the earth turns on its axis, or, "while the earth is spinning at 1,000 miles an hour at the equator."
.
"How can you calculate where a rocket is going to or coming from, when the earth is spinning at 1,000 miles an hour at the equator?"
.
If you get a knowledgeable and honest person to answer your question, he'll assure you that for the purposes of making computations simple, they presume the earth to be stationary. They just can't say that openly because the only thing fit for public consumption is that the earth revolves around the sun and spins on its own axis of rotation. That's the pat answer to simpletons. You know, like roscoe.
.