i

The above got accidentally posted.

What I wanted to post was the following: I just received this message from Admin at flatearthtrads@gmail.com which I have forwarded to Dr. Sungenis:

Here is a translation provided by Dr. R.B.
In Christ,
The Admin

Dear Dr. SUNGENIS,
 
If I correctly understood your question, you ask for more precisions about sunrise and sunsets orientations according to longitude or 'time-zones' instead of latitude, i.e. eastward or westward of Greenwich, is that what you mean ?
Well, it seems to me that it does not change anything, except a delate in time, and I don't mind searching  from your point of view in America where you live. Anyone can verify anyway on timeanddate.com.
 
What I want to demonstrate is very simple and well known from everyone living north from the cancer tropic :
 
The sun goes approximatively from east to west during spring and automn;
                                            from south-east to south-west in the winter (shortest trail);
                                            from north-east to north-west in the summer (longest path).
Does everybody aggree ?
 
The problem is with a globe, should it be either geocentric or heliocentric. If you modelize the 66,6° of the terrestrial axis with the ecliptic plane, you obtain an accurate zenith height of the sun, corresponding to the seasons. And this is why this demonstration operated and convinced, in order to become taught in our choldhoodclasses, inducing everybodu to believe the copernician theory was correct.
However, as soon as you check (turning slowly the globe to mimic morings and evenings at each season position - or the sun on geocentrism - and verifying geometrically the sun's directions ) the exact directions of sunrises and sunsets on the model, you get very strange results not concording with reality :
 
Asymetric orientations during spring and automn where the inclination axis lies in a perpendicular plane towards rhe earth-sun line( either east and south-west or southeast and west)
        this is very odd ; how can one invoque diffraction, reffraction, Einstein theory or even non-euclidian space ? None of these allegations could be responsible for an asymetry between mornings and evenings or why and how ?
 
During summer, the sun would rise in the south-east direction and set in the south-north : as if it was the smallest trajesctry !
Whereas in winter, the sun would go just from east to west ?
 
How can this be ? The model does not fit the observation. Hence, a new model has to replace it unless ther can be even extravagant explanations ?
 
On the other, let us see the FE model:
It can be recognised as perfectly consistent as soon as you admit perspective ( that is limitation of the depth of our eye-view according to the operation of the image going on both sides through the lenses of the corneas and the 'eyelenses' (crystallins ?) ) without ommiting the magnifying reffraction of the humid atmosphere:
Here sunrises and sunsets are always symetrical with the south as in reality;
During summer where the circuit is nearer the north pole, they seem closer to the north (north-east and north-west);
whereas in the winter where the sun's trajectory is further towards the south, the lack of loss of sun's visibility moves towards the south (south-east and south-west).
 
I remain available if you need more information on any detail.
 
I wanted also to tell you you do a very courageous job questionning heliocentrism, because it is much harder than just fighting against evolutionism.
Nonetheless I would like to point out that as soon as we reject some of the official theories and 'results' of NASA or mainscience, then automatically any part of their assertions can be considered as non-reliable and need to be avoided or duly checked. Or this attitude would be 'juridically' irrelevant.
And I agree with you an authentic search of truth has animmense impact on philosophical, metaphysical and theological issues.
 
Best regards, God bless you !
 
Dr. R.B.