COSMOLOGY
LH: Do you think that re-discovering geocentrism is a part of this Logos Revolution?
EMJ: Yes.
LH: When the geocentrist docuмentary, The Principle, was released in 2014, I couldn’t help but notice a sudden surge in outlandish Flat Earth discussions, especially on the Catholic forums. I’d never heard about Flat Earthers until The Principle was released to the public. And I think I recall you discussing with Owen Benjamin about the possibility that there’s been a psy-op going on against new developments in geocentrist research. What powers could possibly be interested in railroading a discussion about such an obscure and likely-not-welcomed topic as geocentrism?
EMJ: I believe that flat-earthism was created to distract people from geocentrism, but I have no idea who is behind it.
LH: I’ve read your piece, about Sir Isaac Newton: English Ideology, Newton & the Exploitation of Science. The way you describe him, he seems like a troubled, usurious, dabbler of arcane paganism. Can you break down just what this man was for lay folks, and should we truly be extolling him like we do, particularly when it comes to gravitational theory?
EMJ: He was an typical academic schemer, who used physics to smuggle pagan cosmology into European thought. In this regard, he was not unlike Hegel, whom I discuss in the Logos book Read Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict between Labor and Usury for my take on Newton.
LH: Have you ever heard of Electric Universe Theory? Do you have any thoughts about it?
EMJ: No
Topic: Forge and Anvil Interviews E. Michael Jones (Read 1151 times)