CathInfo.com

So, when I first started looking into flat earth, I didn't think it likely that I would come around to accepting it.

But the evidence seems to be stacking up strongly in favor of flat earth.

1 ) cities, mountains, other objects that are clearly visible (and obviously not just refraction or "mirage") from distances at which globe earth math would make it impossible

2 ) strong evidence of NASA (and SpaceX) fakery

3 ) sun spots on the top of clouds when sun is allegedly 93 million miles away

4 ) lots of independent (not NASA controlled) footage from high enough where curvature should be visible ... and yet it's not, and where the horizon remains at eye level

5 ) flight plans that don't make any sense except for against a flat earth map

6 ) prohibition of free Antarctic exploration

7 ) moonlight being cooler than surrounding area

8 ) surveyors and engineers ignoring earth curvature

9) NASA images of globe earth are clearly (and admittedly CGI) ... with differing shapes of continents, cut-and-paste repeated cloud patterns, no satellites visible

10) fake Mars rover pictures, obvious green-screened and otherwise faked "astronaut" footage

11) Piccard's pre-NASA statement that the earth looks like a circular disc with upturned edges

12) sun changing size in the sky when it's allegedly 93 million miles away

[this is just off the top of my head, as I'm sure there's more]

On the globe earth side, I see ...

1) the Antarctica problem ... long periods of sunlight where there should be less sunlight according to a flat earth model

2) alleged flights over Antarctica

So the Antarctica problems remains the final obstacle to my being able to completely embrace flat earth.

So, flat earthers, what do you say about the Antarctica issue?  If the circuмference of the Antarctica is so big, why is there so much sunlight during "Southern Hemisphere" summer?  Is light bouncing off the dome or something?