1. Regarding calling names. In my experience, "Flat Earthers" are more interested in facts, experimentation and logic. Simply put, they don't need to resort to name calling.
FEs don't usually call names, except occasionally when they lose patience; as they are constantly attacked.

Let me put it this way:

If I told you, "I was talking to John this morning, and I called him a brain dead simple moron who should be sterilized for the good of society." You'd be like "OUCH! Did you have to be so brutal?" but then if I had added, "after he tried to convince me the earth was flat". You'd laugh and high-five me. ADMIT IT.

In other words, it's like punching nαzιs. If you said you punched just about ANYONE ELSE, people would be critical, unsupportive of your violent behavior, and wouldn't get behind you for it. But if you said your assault victim was a nαzι, you could punch him all you like and people would high-five you. It's part of the programming everyone receives today.
Seriously, there are few other things that are so "open season" according to the modern world, as being Flat Earth. Why?

As a corollary to this, it means that a FE calling a Globe-believer a name is NOT the same thing as a Globe-believer calling a FE a name. Ever heard of "punching down"? AND YET -- 99 times out of 100, the verbal violence is FROM Globers TOWARDS FEs.
How can this be, when they have the full support of the mainstream scientific establishment, the whole world, the entire media, etc.? They should be more secure psychologically -- they shouldn't feel so defensive and scared, where they have to lash out and tear down FEs personally all the time. BUT THEY DO. In fact, some of them are quite vile (attacking spouses, children, making slanderous accusations, etc. -- being quite degenerate).

If the earth were truly a globe, then people would be mildly amused at best at "those weird few" who believe the earth is flat. Why would they waste their time creating a Youtube channel dedicated to bashing flat earthers?

Does anyone create a channel dedicated to the fact that Elvis is dead, or that politicians ARE NOT space aliens? Of course not. It would be a waste of time.

In conclusion -- I consider this a pretty serious argument for Flat Earth in itself, even though it doesn't even begin to address the myriad physical evidence. Unfortunately for globe lovers, the physical evidence is MUCH more immediately relevant, convincing, and powerful. So my point, addressed in this post, seldom gets brought up.

Someone wise said a long time ago the following: "The Bible tells you how to get to heaven...it DOES NOT tell you how the heavens go. That's why we have science."

That sounds like something a science-worshiper would say. Science is the pursuit of knowledge. It isn't a religion or an identity. When you wear a T-shirt that says, "I f*cking love science!" that is not a love of exploring and gaining knowledge of the natural world -- that is an emotional "team mentality" adherence to Scientism, the religion of science.

I'm excited and proud to be a Catholic as well. Several of my kids have Catholic T-shirts, and I wouldn't hesitate to wear one myself. But Catholicism is an identity and a religion. Is "science" such a religion as well?

So you're putting lots of limitations and boundaries around the Bible, similar to the concepts of geofencing, timeboxing, or "limiting the damage". Putting the Bible in a spiwitual playpen of sorts. As the kids say nowadays, "Oof!"

So you admit that the Bible teaches, or at least leans, Flat Earth? And yet you aren't giving Flat Earth more serious consideration?

And no, it wasn't "all scientists" who taught the Globe for centuries. That's another lie.

There were many Flat Earth books written in the 1800's, and they were the resources that got the current Flat Earth "movement" started around 2015 (the one that had to get smashed with the help of Google/Youtube, various personalities, an extra dollop of propaganda, etc.)

I saw a video of a 100+ year old lady, and she said that she was taught, in school, that the earth was flat. Just 100 years ago!

Unfortunately this debate can bring out the worst in people of both sides, a reason to keep clear of it.

I couldn't disagree more.
Yes the debate gets messy, mostly because of cognitive dissonance and visceral reaction against decades of programming. It is natural to be uncomfortable at first, to the idea that "your whole world is a lie". The powerful emotions that get involved is not a big surprise.

But it's absolutely worth it. Having a grasp of the REALITY or true nature of our realm is about as foundational as truth gets!
One should *definitely* look into it, get to the bottom of it, and resolve the question definitively, insofar as it lies within your power.

1. Regarding calling names. In my experience, "Flat Earthers" are more interested in facts, experimentation and logic. Simply put, they don't need to resort to name calling.
FEs don't usually call names, except occasionally when they lose patience; as they are constantly attacked.

Let me put it this way:

If I told you, "I was talking to John this morning, and I called him a brain dead simple moron who should be sterilized for the good of society." You'd be like "OUCH! Did you have to be so brutal?" but then if I had added, "after he tried to convince me the earth was flat". You'd laugh and high-five me. ADMIT IT.

In other words, it's like punching nαzιs. If you said you punched just about ANYONE ELSE, people would be critical, unsupportive of your violent behavior, and wouldn't get behind you for it. But if you said your assault victim was a nαzι, you could punch him all you like and people would high-five you. It's part of the programming everyone receives today.
Seriously, there are few other things that are so "open season" according to the modern world, as being Flat Earth. Why?

As a corollary to this, it means that a FE calling a Globe-believer a name is NOT the same thing as a Globe-believer calling a FE a name. Ever heard of "punching down"? AND YET -- 99 times out of 100, the verbal violence is FROM Globers TOWARDS FEs.
How can this be, when they have the full support of the mainstream scientific establishment, the whole world, the entire media, etc.? They should be more secure psychologically -- they shouldn't feel so defensive and scared, where they have to lash out and tear down FEs personally all the time. BUT THEY DO. In fact, some of them are quite vile (attacking spouses, children, making slanderous accusations, etc. -- being quite degenerate).

If the earth were truly a globe, then people would be mildly amused at best at "those weird few" who believe the earth is flat. Why would they waste their time creating a Youtube channel dedicated to bashing flat earthers?

Does anyone create a channel dedicated to the fact that Elvis is dead, or that politicians ARE NOT space aliens? Of course not. It would be a waste of time.

In conclusion -- I consider this a pretty serious argument for Flat Earth in itself, even though it doesn't even begin to address the myriad physical evidence. Unfortunately for globe lovers, the physical evidence is MUCH more immediately relevant, convincing, and powerful. So my point, addressed in this post, seldom gets brought up.

I would like proof that the "globe-tards" (which is a derogatory term that the flat earther's use to talk about globe earthers) on CathInfo are calling flat earthers names.  

But it's absolutely worth it. Having a grasp of the REALITY or true nature of our realm is about as foundational as truth gets!

It helps with the truth of God's creation and God being front and center. That's for sure!

Matthew, give us proof Gray isn't a plant.

What kind of plant do you think I might be?